{"title":"不可逆性牙髓炎上颌前磨牙牙髓麻醉中无针注射的麻醉疗效、注射疼痛及脉搏率影响:随机临床研究。","authors":"Hatice Sağlam, Ertuğrul Karataş","doi":"10.14744/eej.2025.26566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the pain perception associated with the needle-free system (Comfort-In™) and the standard needle injection method during root canal treatments in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-four maxillary premolar teeth of the patients that applied to university for treatment and needed endodontic treatment were included in the study. Patients were anesthetized with two different injection methods; needle-free injection and conventional dental injection. In both groups, oxygen saturation and pulse measurements of the patients were recorded at 30-second intervals for 2 minutes before anesthesia and 4 minutes after anesthesia. Pain during the injection and opening of the access cavity preparation was recorded according to Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The data were analyzed according to a statistical program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, a significant difference was found between the groups in terms of pain during anesthesia administration and the access cavity preparation (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in terms of gender and age (p>0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of oxygen saturation and pulse values before and after treatment (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Needle-free injection makes the treatment more comfortable for patients with injection fear and anxiety, making the procedure easier for the physician and the patient. (EEJ-2024-12-197).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"10 3","pages":"181-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anesthetic Efficacy, Injection Pain and Pulse-rate Effect of Needle-free Injection in Pulpal Anesthesia of Maxillary Premolars with Irreversible Pulpitis: Randomised Clinical Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hatice Sağlam, Ertuğrul Karataş\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/eej.2025.26566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the pain perception associated with the needle-free system (Comfort-In™) and the standard needle injection method during root canal treatments in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-four maxillary premolar teeth of the patients that applied to university for treatment and needed endodontic treatment were included in the study. Patients were anesthetized with two different injection methods; needle-free injection and conventional dental injection. In both groups, oxygen saturation and pulse measurements of the patients were recorded at 30-second intervals for 2 minutes before anesthesia and 4 minutes after anesthesia. Pain during the injection and opening of the access cavity preparation was recorded according to Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The data were analyzed according to a statistical program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, a significant difference was found between the groups in terms of pain during anesthesia administration and the access cavity preparation (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in terms of gender and age (p>0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of oxygen saturation and pulse values before and after treatment (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Needle-free injection makes the treatment more comfortable for patients with injection fear and anxiety, making the procedure easier for the physician and the patient. (EEJ-2024-12-197).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"181-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102772/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2025.26566\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2025.26566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anesthetic Efficacy, Injection Pain and Pulse-rate Effect of Needle-free Injection in Pulpal Anesthesia of Maxillary Premolars with Irreversible Pulpitis: Randomised Clinical Study.
Objective: This study aims to compare the pain perception associated with the needle-free system (Comfort-In™) and the standard needle injection method during root canal treatments in adults.
Methods: Forty-four maxillary premolar teeth of the patients that applied to university for treatment and needed endodontic treatment were included in the study. Patients were anesthetized with two different injection methods; needle-free injection and conventional dental injection. In both groups, oxygen saturation and pulse measurements of the patients were recorded at 30-second intervals for 2 minutes before anesthesia and 4 minutes after anesthesia. Pain during the injection and opening of the access cavity preparation was recorded according to Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The data were analyzed according to a statistical program.
Results: In this study, a significant difference was found between the groups in terms of pain during anesthesia administration and the access cavity preparation (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in terms of gender and age (p>0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of oxygen saturation and pulse values before and after treatment (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Needle-free injection makes the treatment more comfortable for patients with injection fear and anxiety, making the procedure easier for the physician and the patient. (EEJ-2024-12-197).