心理健康实施研究与实践中CBT咨询的伦理思考与实践建议

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Samantha J Rushworth, Siena K Tugendrajch, Torrey A Creed, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Michael Steinberg, Emily Becker-Haimes
{"title":"心理健康实施研究与实践中CBT咨询的伦理思考与实践建议","authors":"Samantha J Rushworth, Siena K Tugendrajch, Torrey A Creed, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Michael Steinberg, Emily Becker-Haimes","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2511088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implementation efforts to increase delivery of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) require ongoing consultation to support the necessary skill development, intervention delivery, and sustainability of its practice in the face of common barriers. However, many ethical challenges can arise within consultation across implementation research and practice at both an individual and organizational level that are not easily resolved within current ethical guidelines. In this paper, we highlight the role of consultation in implementation science and practice and illustrate major ethical challenges that can arise in CBT consultation (i.e. role clarity, influence and power dynamics, professional differences, legal requirements), providing relevant case examples. We then offer practical suggestions for consultants to effectively and proactively address ethically challenging situations, guided by a structured problem-solving framework with reflective questions. We present an extended case example to demonstrate the utility of the proposed framework to support clinicians-particularly practitioners engaged in training and consultation-to support delivery of high-quality, evidence-based care. We conclude by discussing important future directions as they relate to ethical consultation practices to advance CBT implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical considerations and practical suggestions for CBT consultation in mental health implementation research and practice.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha J Rushworth, Siena K Tugendrajch, Torrey A Creed, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Michael Steinberg, Emily Becker-Haimes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16506073.2025.2511088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Implementation efforts to increase delivery of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) require ongoing consultation to support the necessary skill development, intervention delivery, and sustainability of its practice in the face of common barriers. However, many ethical challenges can arise within consultation across implementation research and practice at both an individual and organizational level that are not easily resolved within current ethical guidelines. In this paper, we highlight the role of consultation in implementation science and practice and illustrate major ethical challenges that can arise in CBT consultation (i.e. role clarity, influence and power dynamics, professional differences, legal requirements), providing relevant case examples. We then offer practical suggestions for consultants to effectively and proactively address ethically challenging situations, guided by a structured problem-solving framework with reflective questions. We present an extended case example to demonstrate the utility of the proposed framework to support clinicians-particularly practitioners engaged in training and consultation-to support delivery of high-quality, evidence-based care. We conclude by discussing important future directions as they relate to ethical consultation practices to advance CBT implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2511088\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2511088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知行为疗法(CBT)的实施需要持续的咨询,以支持必要的技能发展,干预交付,以及面对常见障碍时其实践的可持续性。然而,在个人和组织层面的实施研究和实践磋商中,可能会出现许多道德挑战,这些挑战在当前的道德准则中不容易解决。在本文中,我们强调了咨询在实施科学和实践中的作用,并举例说明了CBT咨询中可能出现的主要伦理挑战(即角色清晰度、影响力和权力动态、专业差异、法律要求),并提供了相关案例。然后,我们为顾问提供切实可行的建议,以有效和主动地解决道德挑战的情况,并以具有反思性问题的结构化问题解决框架为指导。我们提出了一个扩展的案例来证明所提出的框架在支持临床医生——特别是从事培训和咨询的从业者——支持提供高质量、循证护理方面的效用。最后,我们讨论了重要的未来方向,因为它们与伦理咨询实践有关,以促进CBT的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical considerations and practical suggestions for CBT consultation in mental health implementation research and practice.

Implementation efforts to increase delivery of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) require ongoing consultation to support the necessary skill development, intervention delivery, and sustainability of its practice in the face of common barriers. However, many ethical challenges can arise within consultation across implementation research and practice at both an individual and organizational level that are not easily resolved within current ethical guidelines. In this paper, we highlight the role of consultation in implementation science and practice and illustrate major ethical challenges that can arise in CBT consultation (i.e. role clarity, influence and power dynamics, professional differences, legal requirements), providing relevant case examples. We then offer practical suggestions for consultants to effectively and proactively address ethically challenging situations, guided by a structured problem-solving framework with reflective questions. We present an extended case example to demonstrate the utility of the proposed framework to support clinicians-particularly practitioners engaged in training and consultation-to support delivery of high-quality, evidence-based care. We conclude by discussing important future directions as they relate to ethical consultation practices to advance CBT implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the application of behavioural and cognitive sciences to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The journal publishes state-of-the-art scientific articles within: - clinical and health psychology - psychopathology - behavioural medicine - assessment - treatment - theoretical issues pertinent to behavioural, cognitive and combined cognitive behavioural therapies With the number of high quality contributions increasing, the journal has been able to maintain a rapid publication schedule, providing readers with the latest research in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信