创伤损失的幸存者:幸存者内疚管理的辩证方法。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Shani Pitcho
{"title":"创伤损失的幸存者:幸存者内疚管理的辩证方法。","authors":"Shani Pitcho","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2025.2513985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the discursive strategies trauma survivors who endured a traumatic event in which their loved one died employ to navigate survivor guilt. Fourteen Israeli adults participated in in-depth semi-structured interviews, analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic approach. Two core discourses of guilt management emerged: acceptance and rejection, both situated along a continuum and often coexisting in participants' narratives. Applying Relational Dialectics Theory, this study frames the interplay of these discourses as a discursive struggle, embodying the dual role of \"surviving grievers,\" balancing their own survival with the death of their loved one. This effort reflects a complex endeavor to reconcile the reality of loss with the arbitrary nature of life. The findings underscore the influence of cultural and relational contexts in shaping survivor guilt, providing valuable insights for therapeutic interventions and support systems, and highlighting the need to develop targeted interventions for those agonizing with trauma-related guilt.</p>","PeriodicalId":11041,"journal":{"name":"Death Studies","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surviving grievers of traumatic loss: A dialectical approach to survivor guilt management.\",\"authors\":\"Shani Pitcho\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07481187.2025.2513985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examines the discursive strategies trauma survivors who endured a traumatic event in which their loved one died employ to navigate survivor guilt. Fourteen Israeli adults participated in in-depth semi-structured interviews, analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic approach. Two core discourses of guilt management emerged: acceptance and rejection, both situated along a continuum and often coexisting in participants' narratives. Applying Relational Dialectics Theory, this study frames the interplay of these discourses as a discursive struggle, embodying the dual role of \\\"surviving grievers,\\\" balancing their own survival with the death of their loved one. This effort reflects a complex endeavor to reconcile the reality of loss with the arbitrary nature of life. The findings underscore the influence of cultural and relational contexts in shaping survivor guilt, providing valuable insights for therapeutic interventions and support systems, and highlighting the need to develop targeted interventions for those agonizing with trauma-related guilt.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Death Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Death Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2025.2513985\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Death Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2025.2513985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了经历过亲人死亡的创伤事件的创伤幸存者使用话语策略来引导幸存者内疚。14名以色列成年人参加了深入的半结构化访谈,使用布劳恩和克拉克的主题方法进行分析。内疚管理的两个核心话语出现了:接受和拒绝,两者都处于一个连续体中,并且经常共存于参与者的叙述中。运用关系辩证法理论,本研究将这些话语的相互作用构建为话语斗争,体现了“幸存的悲伤者”的双重角色,平衡了他们自己的生存与他们所爱的人的死亡。这种努力反映了一种复杂的努力,即调和失去的现实与生活的随意性。研究结果强调了文化和关系背景对幸存者内疚感形成的影响,为治疗干预和支持系统提供了有价值的见解,并强调了为那些遭受创伤相关内疚感折磨的人制定有针对性的干预措施的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surviving grievers of traumatic loss: A dialectical approach to survivor guilt management.

This study examines the discursive strategies trauma survivors who endured a traumatic event in which their loved one died employ to navigate survivor guilt. Fourteen Israeli adults participated in in-depth semi-structured interviews, analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic approach. Two core discourses of guilt management emerged: acceptance and rejection, both situated along a continuum and often coexisting in participants' narratives. Applying Relational Dialectics Theory, this study frames the interplay of these discourses as a discursive struggle, embodying the dual role of "surviving grievers," balancing their own survival with the death of their loved one. This effort reflects a complex endeavor to reconcile the reality of loss with the arbitrary nature of life. The findings underscore the influence of cultural and relational contexts in shaping survivor guilt, providing valuable insights for therapeutic interventions and support systems, and highlighting the need to develop targeted interventions for those agonizing with trauma-related guilt.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Death Studies
Death Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.90%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Now published ten times each year, this acclaimed journal provides refereed papers on significant research, scholarship, and practical approaches in the fast growing areas of bereavement and loss, grief therapy, death attitudes, suicide, and death education. It provides an international interdisciplinary forum in which a variety of professionals share results of research and practice, with the aim of better understanding the human encounter with death and assisting those who work with the dying and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信