Ahmed O Sabry, Mohamed K A Genedy, Yara Kassem, Marwa El-Difrawy, Reem Shalata, Maziad Hennidi, Farah A R Salama, Badr Ali Mohammed Badr, Mohamed Abdel-Wahed
{"title":"单双肌腱移植改善臂丛出生性麻痹肩关节功能:比较研究的荟萃分析。","authors":"Ahmed O Sabry, Mohamed K A Genedy, Yara Kassem, Marwa El-Difrawy, Reem Shalata, Maziad Hennidi, Farah A R Salama, Badr Ali Mohammed Badr, Mohamed Abdel-Wahed","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08803-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) may result in lifelong shoulder dysfunction despite nerve repair surgery. Tendon transfer has emerged as a surgical option to restore external rotation and abduction in OBPP sequelae. Single and double tendon transfer techniques have been developed, but the optimal approach remains debated. This meta-analysis is the first to compare the range of motion outcomes and complications, particularly loss of midline function (LOM), between the two techniques in managing OBPP sequelae.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On January 2025, systematic literature search was performed in five databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science), to identify studies comparing single and double tendon transfer in children with OBPP. Eligible studies underwent quality assessment via MINORS criteria and a meta-analysis using RevMan was conducted to compare the functional outcomes and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five retrospective studies encompassing 189 patients were analyzed. The pooled mean difference (MD) in the total modified Mallet score between groups was statistically insignificant (MD = 0.09; 95% CI= -0.68 to 0.85;p > 0.05). Analyses for the sub-scores revealed no differences across all sub-scores. However, for Latissimus Dorsi (LD) single transfers, Abdel-Ghani et al. reported 7.7-fold greater odds of LOM (OR = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.04-0.42;p < 0.05), whereas the pooled LOM of Teres Major (TM) single transfers were not significantly different (OR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.11-1.47;p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that both single and double tendon transfers achieve comparable functional outcomes. However, the data suggests that LD single tendon transfer potentially lowers rate of LOM, though further research is needed to confirm this finding.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single versus double tendon transfer for improving shoulder function in brachial plexus birth palsy: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed O Sabry, Mohamed K A Genedy, Yara Kassem, Marwa El-Difrawy, Reem Shalata, Maziad Hennidi, Farah A R Salama, Badr Ali Mohammed Badr, Mohamed Abdel-Wahed\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12891-025-08803-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) may result in lifelong shoulder dysfunction despite nerve repair surgery. Tendon transfer has emerged as a surgical option to restore external rotation and abduction in OBPP sequelae. Single and double tendon transfer techniques have been developed, but the optimal approach remains debated. This meta-analysis is the first to compare the range of motion outcomes and complications, particularly loss of midline function (LOM), between the two techniques in managing OBPP sequelae.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On January 2025, systematic literature search was performed in five databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science), to identify studies comparing single and double tendon transfer in children with OBPP. Eligible studies underwent quality assessment via MINORS criteria and a meta-analysis using RevMan was conducted to compare the functional outcomes and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five retrospective studies encompassing 189 patients were analyzed. The pooled mean difference (MD) in the total modified Mallet score between groups was statistically insignificant (MD = 0.09; 95% CI= -0.68 to 0.85;p > 0.05). Analyses for the sub-scores revealed no differences across all sub-scores. However, for Latissimus Dorsi (LD) single transfers, Abdel-Ghani et al. reported 7.7-fold greater odds of LOM (OR = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.04-0.42;p < 0.05), whereas the pooled LOM of Teres Major (TM) single transfers were not significantly different (OR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.11-1.47;p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that both single and double tendon transfers achieve comparable functional outcomes. However, the data suggests that LD single tendon transfer potentially lowers rate of LOM, though further research is needed to confirm this finding.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135586/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08803-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08803-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:尽管进行了神经修复手术,产科臂丛神经麻痹(OBPP)仍可能导致终身肩关节功能障碍。肌腱转移已成为恢复OBPP后遗症的外旋和外展的手术选择。单肌腱和双肌腱转移技术已经发展起来,但最佳方法仍然存在争议。这项荟萃分析首次比较了两种治疗OBPP后遗症的技术之间的活动范围结果和并发症,特别是中线功能丧失(LOM)。方法:于2025年1月,系统检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science 5个数据库进行文献检索,找出比较OBPP患儿单肌腱和双肌腱转移的研究。通过未成年人标准对符合条件的研究进行质量评估,并使用RevMan进行荟萃分析,比较功能结局和并发症。结果:我们分析了包括189例患者在内的5项回顾性研究。两组间改良Mallet总分的合并平均差异(MD)无统计学意义(MD = 0.09;95% CI= -0.68 ~ 0.85;p < 0.05)。对分值的分析显示所有分值之间没有差异。然而,对于背阔肌(LD)单次转移,Abdel-Ghani等人报道了7.7倍的LOM几率(OR = 0.13;95% CI = 0.04-0.42;p 0.05)。结论:总之,我们的荟萃分析表明,单肌腱和双肌腱移植的功能效果相当。然而,数据表明LD单肌腱转移可能降低LOM的发生率,尽管需要进一步的研究来证实这一发现。临床试验号:不适用。
Single versus double tendon transfer for improving shoulder function in brachial plexus birth palsy: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Background: Obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) may result in lifelong shoulder dysfunction despite nerve repair surgery. Tendon transfer has emerged as a surgical option to restore external rotation and abduction in OBPP sequelae. Single and double tendon transfer techniques have been developed, but the optimal approach remains debated. This meta-analysis is the first to compare the range of motion outcomes and complications, particularly loss of midline function (LOM), between the two techniques in managing OBPP sequelae.
Methods: On January 2025, systematic literature search was performed in five databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science), to identify studies comparing single and double tendon transfer in children with OBPP. Eligible studies underwent quality assessment via MINORS criteria and a meta-analysis using RevMan was conducted to compare the functional outcomes and complications.
Results: Five retrospective studies encompassing 189 patients were analyzed. The pooled mean difference (MD) in the total modified Mallet score between groups was statistically insignificant (MD = 0.09; 95% CI= -0.68 to 0.85;p > 0.05). Analyses for the sub-scores revealed no differences across all sub-scores. However, for Latissimus Dorsi (LD) single transfers, Abdel-Ghani et al. reported 7.7-fold greater odds of LOM (OR = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.04-0.42;p < 0.05), whereas the pooled LOM of Teres Major (TM) single transfers were not significantly different (OR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.11-1.47;p > 0.05).
Conclusion: In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that both single and double tendon transfers achieve comparable functional outcomes. However, the data suggests that LD single tendon transfer potentially lowers rate of LOM, though further research is needed to confirm this finding.
期刊介绍:
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.