重新评估单支架技术治疗孤立性左前降口疾病:一项为期两年的血管内超声引导下的精确、漂浮和交叉支架置入策略的回顾性比较。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Xi Wu, Mingxing Wu, Haobo Huang, Zhe Liu, He Huang, Lei Wang
{"title":"重新评估单支架技术治疗孤立性左前降口疾病:一项为期两年的血管内超声引导下的精确、漂浮和交叉支架置入策略的回顾性比较。","authors":"Xi Wu, Mingxing Wu, Haobo Huang, Zhe Liu, He Huang, Lei Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12872-025-04894-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for isolated left anterior descending (LAD) ostial lesions remains challenging, with limited comparative data on stenting strategies. We aimed to evaluate the procedural and long-term outcomes of three single-stent techniques: precise ostial stenting (POS), floating stenting (FS), and crossover stenting (CS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 116 patients with isolated LAD ostial disease underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI using one of the three strategies. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, IVUS findings, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) over two years were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to POS and FS, CS resulted in larger minimal stent area at the ostium, and a higher rate of complete stent coverage (100% vs. 39.5% and 23.1%, p < 0.001). At 2-year follow-up, MACCE rates were significantly lower in the CS group (2.6%) compared to FS (13.5%) and POS (15.8%, p = 0.039), mainly due to reduced target lesion revascularization. FS showed improved coverage compared to POS, but inferior angiographic outcomes and higher event rates than CS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In IVUS-guided PCI for isolated LAD ostial lesions, CS offers superior ostial coverage and clinical outcomes. FS may serve as a compromise when anatomical constraints limit crossover. These findings support a tailored strategy based on lesion characteristics and IVUS assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reassessing single-stent techniques for isolated left anterior descending ostial disease: a two-year intravascular ultrasound-guided retrospective comparison of precise ostial, floating, and crossover stenting strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Xi Wu, Mingxing Wu, Haobo Huang, Zhe Liu, He Huang, Lei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12872-025-04894-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for isolated left anterior descending (LAD) ostial lesions remains challenging, with limited comparative data on stenting strategies. We aimed to evaluate the procedural and long-term outcomes of three single-stent techniques: precise ostial stenting (POS), floating stenting (FS), and crossover stenting (CS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 116 patients with isolated LAD ostial disease underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI using one of the three strategies. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, IVUS findings, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) over two years were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to POS and FS, CS resulted in larger minimal stent area at the ostium, and a higher rate of complete stent coverage (100% vs. 39.5% and 23.1%, p < 0.001). At 2-year follow-up, MACCE rates were significantly lower in the CS group (2.6%) compared to FS (13.5%) and POS (15.8%, p = 0.039), mainly due to reduced target lesion revascularization. FS showed improved coverage compared to POS, but inferior angiographic outcomes and higher event rates than CS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In IVUS-guided PCI for isolated LAD ostial lesions, CS offers superior ostial coverage and clinical outcomes. FS may serve as a compromise when anatomical constraints limit crossover. These findings support a tailored strategy based on lesion characteristics and IVUS assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135292/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-025-04894-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-025-04894-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗孤立性左前降(LAD)口病变仍然具有挑战性,关于支架置入策略的比较数据有限。我们的目的是评估三种单支架技术的手术和长期结果:精确口支架(POS),浮动支架(FS)和交叉支架(CS)。方法:在本回顾性研究中,116例孤立性LAD口疾病患者采用血管内超声(IVUS)引导下的三种策略之一行PCI。基线特征、程序细节、IVUS结果和两年内主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCEs)进行比较。结果:与POS和FS相比,CS在开口处的最小支架面积更大,支架完全覆盖率更高(100% vs. 39.5%和23.1%)。结论:在ivus引导下的孤立LAD口病变PCI治疗中,CS提供了更好的口覆盖和临床结果。当解剖约束限制交叉时,FS可作为一种折衷方案。这些发现支持基于病变特征和IVUS评估的量身定制策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reassessing single-stent techniques for isolated left anterior descending ostial disease: a two-year intravascular ultrasound-guided retrospective comparison of precise ostial, floating, and crossover stenting strategies.

Background/objectives: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for isolated left anterior descending (LAD) ostial lesions remains challenging, with limited comparative data on stenting strategies. We aimed to evaluate the procedural and long-term outcomes of three single-stent techniques: precise ostial stenting (POS), floating stenting (FS), and crossover stenting (CS).

Methods: In this retrospective study, 116 patients with isolated LAD ostial disease underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI using one of the three strategies. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, IVUS findings, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) over two years were compared.

Results: Compared to POS and FS, CS resulted in larger minimal stent area at the ostium, and a higher rate of complete stent coverage (100% vs. 39.5% and 23.1%, p < 0.001). At 2-year follow-up, MACCE rates were significantly lower in the CS group (2.6%) compared to FS (13.5%) and POS (15.8%, p = 0.039), mainly due to reduced target lesion revascularization. FS showed improved coverage compared to POS, but inferior angiographic outcomes and higher event rates than CS.

Conclusions: In IVUS-guided PCI for isolated LAD ostial lesions, CS offers superior ostial coverage and clinical outcomes. FS may serve as a compromise when anatomical constraints limit crossover. These findings support a tailored strategy based on lesion characteristics and IVUS assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信