脊髓损伤分类的神经学检查中运动和感觉成分的访谈和在线自我报告版本的开发。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Thomas N Bryce, Laiba Afzal, Stephen P Burns, Marcel P Dijkers, Steven Kirshblum, Ralph J Marino, Jayme O'Connor, Arianny Ramirez, Brittany Snider, Lisa Spielman, Chung-Ying Tsai
{"title":"脊髓损伤分类的神经学检查中运动和感觉成分的访谈和在线自我报告版本的开发。","authors":"Thomas N Bryce, Laiba Afzal, Stephen P Burns, Marcel P Dijkers, Steven Kirshblum, Ralph J Marino, Jayme O'Connor, Arianny Ramirez, Brittany Snider, Lisa Spielman, Chung-Ying Tsai","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a patient-reported outcome (PRO) survey measure of the motor, sensory, and anorectal components needed for classifying spinal cord injury (SCI) according to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) DESIGN: Questionnaire development through an iterative process of review, feedback provision, and consensus revision incorporating two rounds of cognitive interviewing (CI) SETTING: Community PARTICIPANTS: 34 individuals with SCI who were English-speaking and aged 18 and older were recruited nationally through social media and advertisements to complete CI. Purposive sampling was used to ensure participants with complete and incomplete injuries in six cohorts based upon neurological level of injury (C1-4, C5-6, C7-T1, T2-T6, T7-T12, and L1-S5) were enrolled.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Online Neurological Exam for Spinal Cord Injury (One-SCI) RESULTS: A group of SCI clinicians, a graphic artist, ISNCSCI experts, researchers with expertise in questionnaire development, cognitive interviewing, and statistics; and a person with SCI who has lived experience with SCI developed the initial One-SCI questionnaire. A CI script with pre-determined verbal probing questions was developed, designed to assess language appropriateness, vocabulary, concept simplicity, grammar, question structure, visual aids, emotional and mental burden both in the instructions and in the questions and available responses. Participants completed an online or interview version of the survey during two rounds of CI. After each round, changes were made to the instructions, questions, responses, and graphics. The final survey has a minimum of 154 and a maximum of 210 items, depending on branching logic driven by previous answers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One-SCI allows online or interviewer-administered self-report documentation of the motor and sensory components of a neurological examination for classifying SCI. Developed using an in-depth CI process, it may allow remote assessments of the elements required by an individual trained to interpret ISNCSCI examination findings to determine neurological status and classify SCI when an in-person ISNCSCI examination is not obtainable.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Interview and Online Self-Report Versions of Motor and Sensory Components of a Neurological Exam for Classifying Spinal Cord Injury (One-SCI).\",\"authors\":\"Thomas N Bryce, Laiba Afzal, Stephen P Burns, Marcel P Dijkers, Steven Kirshblum, Ralph J Marino, Jayme O'Connor, Arianny Ramirez, Brittany Snider, Lisa Spielman, Chung-Ying Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a patient-reported outcome (PRO) survey measure of the motor, sensory, and anorectal components needed for classifying spinal cord injury (SCI) according to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) DESIGN: Questionnaire development through an iterative process of review, feedback provision, and consensus revision incorporating two rounds of cognitive interviewing (CI) SETTING: Community PARTICIPANTS: 34 individuals with SCI who were English-speaking and aged 18 and older were recruited nationally through social media and advertisements to complete CI. Purposive sampling was used to ensure participants with complete and incomplete injuries in six cohorts based upon neurological level of injury (C1-4, C5-6, C7-T1, T2-T6, T7-T12, and L1-S5) were enrolled.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Online Neurological Exam for Spinal Cord Injury (One-SCI) RESULTS: A group of SCI clinicians, a graphic artist, ISNCSCI experts, researchers with expertise in questionnaire development, cognitive interviewing, and statistics; and a person with SCI who has lived experience with SCI developed the initial One-SCI questionnaire. A CI script with pre-determined verbal probing questions was developed, designed to assess language appropriateness, vocabulary, concept simplicity, grammar, question structure, visual aids, emotional and mental burden both in the instructions and in the questions and available responses. Participants completed an online or interview version of the survey during two rounds of CI. After each round, changes were made to the instructions, questions, responses, and graphics. The final survey has a minimum of 154 and a maximum of 210 items, depending on branching logic driven by previous answers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One-SCI allows online or interviewer-administered self-report documentation of the motor and sensory components of a neurological examination for classifying SCI. Developed using an in-depth CI process, it may allow remote assessments of the elements required by an individual trained to interpret ISNCSCI examination findings to determine neurological status and classify SCI when an in-person ISNCSCI examination is not obtainable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根据国际脊髓损伤神经学分类标准(ISNCSCI),开发一种患者报告的结果(PRO)调查方法,测量脊髓损伤(SCI)分类所需的运动、感觉和肛肠成分。设计:通过回顾、反馈提供和共识修订的迭代过程开发问卷,包括两轮认知访谈(CI)。通过社交媒体和广告在全国范围内招募了34名说英语且年龄在18岁及以上的SCI患者来完成CI。采用有目的的抽样方法,根据神经损伤程度(C1-4、C5-6、C7-T1、T2-T6、T7-T12和L1-S5),将完整和不完整损伤的参与者纳入6个队列。干预措施:不适用主要结果测量:脊髓损伤在线神经学检查(One-SCI)结果:一组脊髓损伤临床医生,一名图形艺术家,ISNCSCI专家,具有问卷开发,认知访谈和统计学专业知识的研究人员;一位有SCI经历的SCI患者开发了最初的One-SCI问卷。开发了一个带有预先确定的口头探究问题的CI脚本,旨在评估语言的适当性、词汇量、概念的简单性、语法、问题结构、视觉辅助、指导、问题和可用回答中的情感和精神负担。参与者在两轮CI中完成了在线或访谈版本的调查。每一轮后,对说明、问题、回答和图形进行更改。最后的调查至少有154项,最多有210项,这取决于之前的答案所驱动的分支逻辑。结论:One-SCI允许在线或访谈者自我报告记录神经学检查的运动和感觉成分,用于分类SCI。使用深度CI流程开发,当无法进行现场ISNCSCI检查时,它可以允许接受培训的个人对ISNCSCI检查结果进行远程评估,以确定神经系统状态并对SCI进行分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of Interview and Online Self-Report Versions of Motor and Sensory Components of a Neurological Exam for Classifying Spinal Cord Injury (One-SCI).

Objective: To develop a patient-reported outcome (PRO) survey measure of the motor, sensory, and anorectal components needed for classifying spinal cord injury (SCI) according to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) DESIGN: Questionnaire development through an iterative process of review, feedback provision, and consensus revision incorporating two rounds of cognitive interviewing (CI) SETTING: Community PARTICIPANTS: 34 individuals with SCI who were English-speaking and aged 18 and older were recruited nationally through social media and advertisements to complete CI. Purposive sampling was used to ensure participants with complete and incomplete injuries in six cohorts based upon neurological level of injury (C1-4, C5-6, C7-T1, T2-T6, T7-T12, and L1-S5) were enrolled.

Interventions: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Online Neurological Exam for Spinal Cord Injury (One-SCI) RESULTS: A group of SCI clinicians, a graphic artist, ISNCSCI experts, researchers with expertise in questionnaire development, cognitive interviewing, and statistics; and a person with SCI who has lived experience with SCI developed the initial One-SCI questionnaire. A CI script with pre-determined verbal probing questions was developed, designed to assess language appropriateness, vocabulary, concept simplicity, grammar, question structure, visual aids, emotional and mental burden both in the instructions and in the questions and available responses. Participants completed an online or interview version of the survey during two rounds of CI. After each round, changes were made to the instructions, questions, responses, and graphics. The final survey has a minimum of 154 and a maximum of 210 items, depending on branching logic driven by previous answers.

Conclusions: One-SCI allows online or interviewer-administered self-report documentation of the motor and sensory components of a neurological examination for classifying SCI. Developed using an in-depth CI process, it may allow remote assessments of the elements required by an individual trained to interpret ISNCSCI examination findings to determine neurological status and classify SCI when an in-person ISNCSCI examination is not obtainable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信