Andrew J Cutler, Hemangi R Panchmatia, Alejandro G Hughes, Noah S Webb, Michael J Doane, Rakesh Jain
{"title":"奥氮平/萨米多芬开始治疗前后6个月的医疗资源利用:精神分裂症或双相I型障碍患者的真实世界评估","authors":"Andrew J Cutler, Hemangi R Panchmatia, Alejandro G Hughes, Noah S Webb, Michael J Doane, Rakesh Jain","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03211-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A combination of olanzapine and samidorphan (OLZ/SAM), approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (2021) for the treatment of adults with schizophrenia (SZ) or bipolar I disorder (BD-I), mitigates weight gain associated with olanzapine treatment. This study examined changes in healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with SZ or BD-I after initiating OLZ/SAM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis utilized USA-based administrative claims data from April 19, 2021 to December 31, 2022. Adults aged ≥ 18 years with SZ or BD-I who had continuous enrollment ≥ 6 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) OLZ/SAM initiation (index) were eligible. HCRU comparisons included inpatient admissions, average number of inpatient days, emergency department (ED) visits, and outpatient visits between 6-month baseline and follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1546 patients initiated OLZ/SAM (SZ: n = 855, mean age 39.4 years, 52.6% male; BD-I: n = 691, 38.4 years, 31.0% male). Overall, 446 (52.2%) patients with SZ and 302 (43.7%) patients with BD-I remained on OLZ/SAM during the full 6-month follow-up (median days persistent 182 and 106, respectively). In the SZ and BD-I cohorts, proportions of patients with all-cause and mental health (MH)-related inpatient admissions and ED visits significantly decreased between baseline and follow-up (all-cause: all P ≤ 0.026; MH-related: all P < 0.001). Findings were similar for disease-specific outcomes with the exception that reductions in BD-I-related ED visits were not significant. Average number of inpatient days decreased after OLZ/SAM initiation in both cohorts; in patients with BD-I, those reductions were statistically significant (all P ≤ 0.022). The proportions of patients with outpatient visits were similar between baseline and follow-up for both cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results from this first real-world study assessing HCRU after OLZ/SAM initiation suggest that OLZ/SAM results in reductions in burden for patients, providers, and the healthcare system, as evidenced by reductions in acute all-cause, MH-related, and disease-specific HCRU among SZ and BD-I cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare Resource Utilization 6 Months Before and After Olanzapine/Samidorphan Initiation: Real-World Assessment of Patients with Schizophrenia or Bipolar I Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J Cutler, Hemangi R Panchmatia, Alejandro G Hughes, Noah S Webb, Michael J Doane, Rakesh Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-025-03211-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A combination of olanzapine and samidorphan (OLZ/SAM), approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (2021) for the treatment of adults with schizophrenia (SZ) or bipolar I disorder (BD-I), mitigates weight gain associated with olanzapine treatment. This study examined changes in healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with SZ or BD-I after initiating OLZ/SAM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis utilized USA-based administrative claims data from April 19, 2021 to December 31, 2022. Adults aged ≥ 18 years with SZ or BD-I who had continuous enrollment ≥ 6 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) OLZ/SAM initiation (index) were eligible. HCRU comparisons included inpatient admissions, average number of inpatient days, emergency department (ED) visits, and outpatient visits between 6-month baseline and follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1546 patients initiated OLZ/SAM (SZ: n = 855, mean age 39.4 years, 52.6% male; BD-I: n = 691, 38.4 years, 31.0% male). Overall, 446 (52.2%) patients with SZ and 302 (43.7%) patients with BD-I remained on OLZ/SAM during the full 6-month follow-up (median days persistent 182 and 106, respectively). In the SZ and BD-I cohorts, proportions of patients with all-cause and mental health (MH)-related inpatient admissions and ED visits significantly decreased between baseline and follow-up (all-cause: all P ≤ 0.026; MH-related: all P < 0.001). Findings were similar for disease-specific outcomes with the exception that reductions in BD-I-related ED visits were not significant. Average number of inpatient days decreased after OLZ/SAM initiation in both cohorts; in patients with BD-I, those reductions were statistically significant (all P ≤ 0.022). The proportions of patients with outpatient visits were similar between baseline and follow-up for both cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results from this first real-world study assessing HCRU after OLZ/SAM initiation suggest that OLZ/SAM results in reductions in burden for patients, providers, and the healthcare system, as evidenced by reductions in acute all-cause, MH-related, and disease-specific HCRU among SZ and BD-I cohorts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03211-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03211-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
美国食品和药物管理局(fda)于2021年批准奥氮平和萨米多芬(OLZ/SAM)联合用于治疗成人精神分裂症(SZ)或双相I型障碍(BD-I),可减轻与奥氮平治疗相关的体重增加。本研究考察了SZ或BD-I患者在开始OLZ/SAM后医疗资源利用(HCRU)的变化。方法:回顾性分析利用2021年4月19日至2022年12月31日在美国的行政索赔数据。年龄≥18岁的SZ或BD-I患者,在OLZ/SAM开始(指数)之前(基线)和之后(随访)连续入组≥6个月。HCRU比较包括6个月基线和随访期间的住院人数、平均住院天数、急诊科(ED)访问量和门诊访问量。结果:共有1546例患者启动了OLZ/SAM (SZ: n = 855),平均年龄39.4岁,男性占52.6%;BD-I: n = 691, 38.4岁,31.0%男性)。总体而言,446例(52.2%)SZ患者和302例(43.7%)BD-I患者在整个6个月的随访期间(中位持续时间分别为182天和106天)仍在使用OLZ/SAM。在SZ和BD-I队列中,与心理健康(MH)相关的全因住院和急诊科就诊的患者比例在基线和随访期间显著下降(全因:均P≤0.026;结论:这项首次评估OLZ/SAM启动后HCRU的真实世界研究的结果表明,OLZ/SAM导致患者、提供者和医疗保健系统的负担减轻,SZ和BD-I队列中急性全因、mh相关和疾病特异性HCRU的减少证明了这一点。
Healthcare Resource Utilization 6 Months Before and After Olanzapine/Samidorphan Initiation: Real-World Assessment of Patients with Schizophrenia or Bipolar I Disorder.
Introduction: A combination of olanzapine and samidorphan (OLZ/SAM), approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (2021) for the treatment of adults with schizophrenia (SZ) or bipolar I disorder (BD-I), mitigates weight gain associated with olanzapine treatment. This study examined changes in healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with SZ or BD-I after initiating OLZ/SAM.
Methods: This retrospective analysis utilized USA-based administrative claims data from April 19, 2021 to December 31, 2022. Adults aged ≥ 18 years with SZ or BD-I who had continuous enrollment ≥ 6 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) OLZ/SAM initiation (index) were eligible. HCRU comparisons included inpatient admissions, average number of inpatient days, emergency department (ED) visits, and outpatient visits between 6-month baseline and follow-up periods.
Results: In total, 1546 patients initiated OLZ/SAM (SZ: n = 855, mean age 39.4 years, 52.6% male; BD-I: n = 691, 38.4 years, 31.0% male). Overall, 446 (52.2%) patients with SZ and 302 (43.7%) patients with BD-I remained on OLZ/SAM during the full 6-month follow-up (median days persistent 182 and 106, respectively). In the SZ and BD-I cohorts, proportions of patients with all-cause and mental health (MH)-related inpatient admissions and ED visits significantly decreased between baseline and follow-up (all-cause: all P ≤ 0.026; MH-related: all P < 0.001). Findings were similar for disease-specific outcomes with the exception that reductions in BD-I-related ED visits were not significant. Average number of inpatient days decreased after OLZ/SAM initiation in both cohorts; in patients with BD-I, those reductions were statistically significant (all P ≤ 0.022). The proportions of patients with outpatient visits were similar between baseline and follow-up for both cohorts.
Conclusions: Results from this first real-world study assessing HCRU after OLZ/SAM initiation suggest that OLZ/SAM results in reductions in burden for patients, providers, and the healthcare system, as evidenced by reductions in acute all-cause, MH-related, and disease-specific HCRU among SZ and BD-I cohorts.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.