基于聚类算法的热带河流子流域分类及洪水潜力评价

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ajith G. Nair, R. Kiran
{"title":"基于聚类算法的热带河流子流域分类及洪水潜力评价","authors":"Ajith G. Nair,&nbsp;R. Kiran","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Three clustering algorithms, K-means clustering analysis (KCA), fuzzy cluster analysis (FCA), and density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), are applied to classify the 13 subbasins of the Mahe River, southwest India, based on 13 morphometric parameters of each. Suitable validation indices, such as Davies–Bouldin and Calinski–Harabasz indices, have been used to select the optimal number of clusters using KCA and FCA techniques. All three analyses have yielded three clusters, with subbasins 3–8 forming the first one. These constitute 23% of the total basin area of the Mahe. SW 12 forms a grouping of its own. The rest, SW 1–2, 9–11, and 13, form the third cluster. The first cluster corresponds to the subbasins identified as most susceptible to flooding. Cluster 3 encompasses the subbasins falling in the “Moderate” and “Least” categories with respect to the risk of flooding. The subbasin 12 (&lt; 1 km<sup>2</sup>) exhibits a deviant morphometric pattern likely due to its specific topographical and network characteristics. The study reveals that cluster algorithms are effective in ranking and prioritizing subbasins of a river based on their potential for natural hazards like flooding. Moreover, the DBSCAN averts the use of cluster validation indices to determine the optimum clusters without compromising the results. All these methods would be beneficial in chalking out suitable management measures for different subbasins of a river based on their potential for any given hazard.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70079","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification and Flooding Potential Assessment of Subbasins of a Tropical River Using Cluster Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Ajith G. Nair,&nbsp;R. Kiran\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfr3.70079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Three clustering algorithms, K-means clustering analysis (KCA), fuzzy cluster analysis (FCA), and density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), are applied to classify the 13 subbasins of the Mahe River, southwest India, based on 13 morphometric parameters of each. Suitable validation indices, such as Davies–Bouldin and Calinski–Harabasz indices, have been used to select the optimal number of clusters using KCA and FCA techniques. All three analyses have yielded three clusters, with subbasins 3–8 forming the first one. These constitute 23% of the total basin area of the Mahe. SW 12 forms a grouping of its own. The rest, SW 1–2, 9–11, and 13, form the third cluster. The first cluster corresponds to the subbasins identified as most susceptible to flooding. Cluster 3 encompasses the subbasins falling in the “Moderate” and “Least” categories with respect to the risk of flooding. The subbasin 12 (&lt; 1 km<sup>2</sup>) exhibits a deviant morphometric pattern likely due to its specific topographical and network characteristics. The study reveals that cluster algorithms are effective in ranking and prioritizing subbasins of a river based on their potential for natural hazards like flooding. Moreover, the DBSCAN averts the use of cluster validation indices to determine the optimum clusters without compromising the results. All these methods would be beneficial in chalking out suitable management measures for different subbasins of a river based on their potential for any given hazard.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70079\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70079\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用k -均值聚类分析(KCA)、模糊聚类分析(FCA)和基于密度的带噪声应用空间聚类(DBSCAN)三种聚类算法,基于13个形态计量参数对印度西南部马河流域的13个子流域进行了分类。采用适当的验证指数,如Davies-Bouldin和Calinski-Harabasz指数,利用KCA和FCA技术选择最优聚类数量。所有三种分析都得出了三个簇,其中3-8次盆地形成了第一个簇。这些盆地占马河盆地总面积的23%。SW 12形成了自己的一组。其余的SW 1-2、9-11和13组成了第三个集群。第一组对应于确定为最易受洪水影响的子盆地。第3组包括就洪水风险而言属于“中等”和“最小”类别的子流域。次盆地12 (1 km2)可能由于其特定的地形和网络特征而表现出异常的形态测量模式。研究表明,基于洪水等自然灾害的可能性,聚类算法在对河流子流域进行排序和优先排序方面是有效的。此外,DBSCAN避免使用集群验证索引来确定最佳集群,而不会影响结果。所有这些方法都有助于根据河流不同子流域的潜在危害制定合适的管理措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classification and Flooding Potential Assessment of Subbasins of a Tropical River Using Cluster Algorithms

Three clustering algorithms, K-means clustering analysis (KCA), fuzzy cluster analysis (FCA), and density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), are applied to classify the 13 subbasins of the Mahe River, southwest India, based on 13 morphometric parameters of each. Suitable validation indices, such as Davies–Bouldin and Calinski–Harabasz indices, have been used to select the optimal number of clusters using KCA and FCA techniques. All three analyses have yielded three clusters, with subbasins 3–8 forming the first one. These constitute 23% of the total basin area of the Mahe. SW 12 forms a grouping of its own. The rest, SW 1–2, 9–11, and 13, form the third cluster. The first cluster corresponds to the subbasins identified as most susceptible to flooding. Cluster 3 encompasses the subbasins falling in the “Moderate” and “Least” categories with respect to the risk of flooding. The subbasin 12 (< 1 km2) exhibits a deviant morphometric pattern likely due to its specific topographical and network characteristics. The study reveals that cluster algorithms are effective in ranking and prioritizing subbasins of a river based on their potential for natural hazards like flooding. Moreover, the DBSCAN averts the use of cluster validation indices to determine the optimum clusters without compromising the results. All these methods would be beneficial in chalking out suitable management measures for different subbasins of a river based on their potential for any given hazard.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信