基于机器学习的广义地震易损性模型的空间分布资产风险评估

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Jia-Wei Ding, Da-Gang Lu, Zheng-Gang Cao
{"title":"基于机器学习的广义地震易损性模型的空间分布资产风险评估","authors":"Jia-Wei Ding,&nbsp;Da-Gang Lu,&nbsp;Zheng-Gang Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban areas consist of a diverse array of spatially distributed assets, encompassing both infrastructure systems and portfolio buildings, both of which are crucial to enhancing the sustainability and resilience of urban. Addressing the seismic risk within such settings requires a nuanced approach that considers the spatial distribution of assets and the correlation among ground motion intensity measures (GMIMs). This study undertakes finite element modeling of different structural types. Recognizing the distinct sensitivities of GMIMs to these structural types, 5 machine learning (ML) methods are implemented to construct prediction models for seismic responses based on 24 GMIMs. The generalized fragility model and vulnerability model are developed for different structural types. Moreover, the spatial cross-correlation of 24 GMIMs is integrated into a loss assessment framework using geostatistical techniques and principal component analysis. A virtual city is taken as a case study, demonstrating that the generalized fragility model based on ML enhances the accuracy of regional loss assessment and improves traffic connectivity reliability compared to traditional fragility models that consider a single GMIM. In summary, this study presents a comprehensive framework for regional seismic risk assessment, leveraging ML alongside spatial analysis to enhance prediction accuracy and reliability, thus offering valuable insights for urban planning and disaster mitigation efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 109533"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk assessment of spatially distributed assets with generalized seismic fragility models based on machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Jia-Wei Ding,&nbsp;Da-Gang Lu,&nbsp;Zheng-Gang Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urban areas consist of a diverse array of spatially distributed assets, encompassing both infrastructure systems and portfolio buildings, both of which are crucial to enhancing the sustainability and resilience of urban. Addressing the seismic risk within such settings requires a nuanced approach that considers the spatial distribution of assets and the correlation among ground motion intensity measures (GMIMs). This study undertakes finite element modeling of different structural types. Recognizing the distinct sensitivities of GMIMs to these structural types, 5 machine learning (ML) methods are implemented to construct prediction models for seismic responses based on 24 GMIMs. The generalized fragility model and vulnerability model are developed for different structural types. Moreover, the spatial cross-correlation of 24 GMIMs is integrated into a loss assessment framework using geostatistical techniques and principal component analysis. A virtual city is taken as a case study, demonstrating that the generalized fragility model based on ML enhances the accuracy of regional loss assessment and improves traffic connectivity reliability compared to traditional fragility models that consider a single GMIM. In summary, this study presents a comprehensive framework for regional seismic risk assessment, leveraging ML alongside spatial analysis to enhance prediction accuracy and reliability, thus offering valuable insights for urban planning and disaster mitigation efforts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109533\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125003264\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125003264","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市地区由各种空间分布的资产组成,包括基础设施系统和组合建筑,这两者对于增强城市的可持续性和复原力至关重要。在这样的环境中解决地震风险需要一种细致入微的方法,考虑到资产的空间分布和地震动强度测量(gims)之间的相关性。本研究对不同结构类型进行了有限元建模。认识到gims对这些结构类型的不同敏感性,采用5种机器学习方法构建基于24个gims的地震响应预测模型。针对不同的结构类型,建立了广义易损性模型和易损性模型。利用地统计技术和主成分分析,将24个gmm的空间相互关系整合到损失评估框架中。以虚拟城市为例,研究结果表明,与考虑单个GMIM的传统脆弱性模型相比,基于ML的广义脆弱性模型提高了区域损失评估的准确性,提高了交通连通性可靠性。总之,本研究提出了一个区域地震风险评估的综合框架,利用ML和空间分析来提高预测的准确性和可靠性,从而为城市规划和减灾工作提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk assessment of spatially distributed assets with generalized seismic fragility models based on machine learning
Urban areas consist of a diverse array of spatially distributed assets, encompassing both infrastructure systems and portfolio buildings, both of which are crucial to enhancing the sustainability and resilience of urban. Addressing the seismic risk within such settings requires a nuanced approach that considers the spatial distribution of assets and the correlation among ground motion intensity measures (GMIMs). This study undertakes finite element modeling of different structural types. Recognizing the distinct sensitivities of GMIMs to these structural types, 5 machine learning (ML) methods are implemented to construct prediction models for seismic responses based on 24 GMIMs. The generalized fragility model and vulnerability model are developed for different structural types. Moreover, the spatial cross-correlation of 24 GMIMs is integrated into a loss assessment framework using geostatistical techniques and principal component analysis. A virtual city is taken as a case study, demonstrating that the generalized fragility model based on ML enhances the accuracy of regional loss assessment and improves traffic connectivity reliability compared to traditional fragility models that consider a single GMIM. In summary, this study presents a comprehensive framework for regional seismic risk assessment, leveraging ML alongside spatial analysis to enhance prediction accuracy and reliability, thus offering valuable insights for urban planning and disaster mitigation efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信