创伤暴露强迫症患者的强迫行为:患病率差异及其对治疗反应的影响

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Caitlin M. Pinciotti , Gregor Horvath , Matti Cervin
{"title":"创伤暴露强迫症患者的强迫行为:患病率差异及其对治疗反应的影响","authors":"Caitlin M. Pinciotti ,&nbsp;Gregor Horvath ,&nbsp;Matti Cervin","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2025.100964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The effectiveness of exposure and response prevention (ERP), a front-line treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), is contingent on reducing engagement in compulsions, though recent research has found that certain compulsions may be less amenable to ERP. Given the impact of trauma exposure on OCD compulsions, the present study sought to examine whether compulsion-specific differences in treatment response may be attributable to trauma exposure. Using a sample of 622 patients diagnosed with OCD receiving intensive treatment (39.7 % trauma-exposed), certain compulsions were found to be more prevalent among trauma-exposed patients and differentially impacted treatment effectiveness. Trauma-exposed patients were more likely to engage in reassurance, rumination, and hair pulling, and less likely to engage in self-assurance compulsions compared to non-trauma exposed patients. Interestingly, among trauma-exposed patients, engaging in self-assurance compulsions was associated with better treatment outcomes and engaging in reassurance compulsions was associated with worsened treatment outcomes. Findings converge with trauma-focused treatment approaches, wherein functional self-assurance is not only permitted but encouraged. Although historically any form of assurance in ERP is discouraged, clinicians treating trauma-exposed patients with OCD may consider leveraging engagement in non-compulsive self-assurance to increase self-efficacy and treatment motivation and challenge distorted trauma-related beliefs. Findings highlight the importance of considering with nuance the function of underlying behaviors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100964"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compulsions in trauma-exposed patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: Differences in prevalence and impact on treatment response\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin M. Pinciotti ,&nbsp;Gregor Horvath ,&nbsp;Matti Cervin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocrd.2025.100964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The effectiveness of exposure and response prevention (ERP), a front-line treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), is contingent on reducing engagement in compulsions, though recent research has found that certain compulsions may be less amenable to ERP. Given the impact of trauma exposure on OCD compulsions, the present study sought to examine whether compulsion-specific differences in treatment response may be attributable to trauma exposure. Using a sample of 622 patients diagnosed with OCD receiving intensive treatment (39.7 % trauma-exposed), certain compulsions were found to be more prevalent among trauma-exposed patients and differentially impacted treatment effectiveness. Trauma-exposed patients were more likely to engage in reassurance, rumination, and hair pulling, and less likely to engage in self-assurance compulsions compared to non-trauma exposed patients. Interestingly, among trauma-exposed patients, engaging in self-assurance compulsions was associated with better treatment outcomes and engaging in reassurance compulsions was associated with worsened treatment outcomes. Findings converge with trauma-focused treatment approaches, wherein functional self-assurance is not only permitted but encouraged. Although historically any form of assurance in ERP is discouraged, clinicians treating trauma-exposed patients with OCD may consider leveraging engagement in non-compulsive self-assurance to increase self-efficacy and treatment motivation and challenge distorted trauma-related beliefs. Findings highlight the importance of considering with nuance the function of underlying behaviors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders\",\"volume\":\"46 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100964\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364925000302\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364925000302","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

暴露和反应预防(ERP)是强迫症(OCD)的一线治疗方法,其有效性取决于减少对强迫行为的参与,尽管最近的研究发现,某些强迫行为可能不太适合ERP。鉴于创伤暴露对强迫症强迫的影响,本研究试图检验治疗反应的强迫特异性差异是否可归因于创伤暴露。对622名接受强化治疗的强迫症患者(39.7%为创伤暴露患者)进行抽样调查,发现某些强迫行为在创伤暴露患者中更为普遍,并对治疗效果产生不同程度的影响。与非创伤暴露的患者相比,创伤暴露的患者更有可能进行安慰、沉思和拔头发,而不太可能进行自我保证强迫症。有趣的是,在创伤暴露的患者中,参与自我保证的强迫行为与更好的治疗结果相关,参与安慰的强迫行为与更糟糕的治疗结果相关。研究结果与以创伤为中心的治疗方法一致,其中功能自我保证不仅允许而且鼓励。虽然历史上任何形式的自我保证都是不被鼓励的,但临床医生治疗创伤暴露的强迫症患者可能会考虑利用非强迫性自我保证来提高自我效能和治疗动机,并挑战扭曲的创伤相关信念。研究结果强调了以细微差别考虑潜在行为功能的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compulsions in trauma-exposed patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: Differences in prevalence and impact on treatment response
The effectiveness of exposure and response prevention (ERP), a front-line treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), is contingent on reducing engagement in compulsions, though recent research has found that certain compulsions may be less amenable to ERP. Given the impact of trauma exposure on OCD compulsions, the present study sought to examine whether compulsion-specific differences in treatment response may be attributable to trauma exposure. Using a sample of 622 patients diagnosed with OCD receiving intensive treatment (39.7 % trauma-exposed), certain compulsions were found to be more prevalent among trauma-exposed patients and differentially impacted treatment effectiveness. Trauma-exposed patients were more likely to engage in reassurance, rumination, and hair pulling, and less likely to engage in self-assurance compulsions compared to non-trauma exposed patients. Interestingly, among trauma-exposed patients, engaging in self-assurance compulsions was associated with better treatment outcomes and engaging in reassurance compulsions was associated with worsened treatment outcomes. Findings converge with trauma-focused treatment approaches, wherein functional self-assurance is not only permitted but encouraged. Although historically any form of assurance in ERP is discouraged, clinicians treating trauma-exposed patients with OCD may consider leveraging engagement in non-compulsive self-assurance to increase self-efficacy and treatment motivation and challenge distorted trauma-related beliefs. Findings highlight the importance of considering with nuance the function of underlying behaviors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (JOCRD) is an international journal that publishes high quality research and clinically-oriented articles dealing with all aspects of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related conditions (OC spectrum disorders; e.g., trichotillomania, hoarding, body dysmorphic disorder). The journal invites studies of clinical and non-clinical (i.e., student) samples of all age groups from the fields of psychiatry, psychology, neuroscience, and other medical and health sciences. The journal''s broad focus encompasses classification, assessment, psychological and psychiatric treatment, prevention, psychopathology, neurobiology and genetics. Clinical reports (descriptions of innovative treatment methods) and book reviews on all aspects of OCD-related disorders will be considered, as will theoretical and review articles that make valuable contributions. Suitable topics for manuscripts include: -The boundaries of OCD and relationships with OC spectrum disorders -Validation of assessments of obsessive-compulsive and related phenomena -OCD symptoms in diverse social and cultural contexts -Studies of neurobiological and genetic factors in OCD and related conditions -Experimental and descriptive psychopathology and epidemiological studies -Studies on relationships among cognitive and behavioral variables in OCD and related disorders -Interpersonal aspects of OCD and related disorders -Evaluation of psychological and psychiatric treatment and prevention programs, and predictors of outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信