集约经营稻田非生物特性、土壤微生物和管理措施对土壤健康的相对贡献

IF 4.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Junjiang Chen , Min Wang , Magkdi Mola , Nikolaos Monokrousos , Tien Ming Lee , Stavros D. Veresoglou
{"title":"集约经营稻田非生物特性、土壤微生物和管理措施对土壤健康的相对贡献","authors":"Junjiang Chen ,&nbsp;Min Wang ,&nbsp;Magkdi Mola ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Monokrousos ,&nbsp;Tien Ming Lee ,&nbsp;Stavros D. Veresoglou","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Preserving the health of soils worldwide is the grounds on which we can solidify human progress. Soil health describes the capacity of soils to function and depends on both abiotic properties and soil biota. The degree to which soil properties or soil microbes dictate soil health, as well as whether the contributions of soil properties and soil biota to soil health overlap, remain uncertain. We address here the relative contributions of abiotic properties, PLFAs and management practices in determining soil health, which we assessed via three ecosystem processes. We specifically evaluated how the abiotic variables (0–10 cm depth) and common phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) markers determined soil health over a network of 36 intensively managed smallholder farms. The experimental design was a block design with three blocks (i.e. three villages) and one manipulation, whether the farms undergone an intermediate fallow period. We abstracted soil health in relation to three ecosystem processes (proxies of ecosystem functioning), crop yield (kg/mu), water stable aggregation (WSA, %) and decomposition, assessed using the in situ 30-day weight loss of green and rooibos tea bags, assayed twice in November 2022, and August 2023. We subsequently questioned the degree to which these three proxies of soil health depended on biotic and abiotic properties of the soils. Across the 36 rice farms, key soil properties exhibited substantial variation, with pH ranging from 3.94 to 7.37, sand content from 9.06 % to 53.50 %, soil organic carbon from 0.53 to 3.39 g/kg, phosphorus from 7.77 to 57.68 mg/kg. We observed that PLFA markers were predominantly driven by soil nutrient availability of C (Soil organic carbon), N (Total nitrogen and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N) and P, as well as soil pH and sand content. The soil properties accounted for 4.6 % of the variability in PLFA markers and were strongly associated with them. Briefly, high nutrient availability of C, N and P would increase the abundance of soil microbes. In addition, abiotic soil properties (pH, Olsen-Phosphorus, ammonium and soil sand content) and PLFA markers (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, fungi; bacteria; total microbial biomass) made comparable (13.3 and 11.7 %, respectively) contributions (i.e. variation partitioning) to the functioning of the ecosystems. We thus propose that maintaining soil health requires the simultaneous consideration of both abiotic and biotic variables.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 106223"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative contributions of abiotic properties, soil microbes, and management practices to soil health in intensively managed rice paddies\",\"authors\":\"Junjiang Chen ,&nbsp;Min Wang ,&nbsp;Magkdi Mola ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Monokrousos ,&nbsp;Tien Ming Lee ,&nbsp;Stavros D. Veresoglou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Preserving the health of soils worldwide is the grounds on which we can solidify human progress. Soil health describes the capacity of soils to function and depends on both abiotic properties and soil biota. The degree to which soil properties or soil microbes dictate soil health, as well as whether the contributions of soil properties and soil biota to soil health overlap, remain uncertain. We address here the relative contributions of abiotic properties, PLFAs and management practices in determining soil health, which we assessed via three ecosystem processes. We specifically evaluated how the abiotic variables (0–10 cm depth) and common phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) markers determined soil health over a network of 36 intensively managed smallholder farms. The experimental design was a block design with three blocks (i.e. three villages) and one manipulation, whether the farms undergone an intermediate fallow period. We abstracted soil health in relation to three ecosystem processes (proxies of ecosystem functioning), crop yield (kg/mu), water stable aggregation (WSA, %) and decomposition, assessed using the in situ 30-day weight loss of green and rooibos tea bags, assayed twice in November 2022, and August 2023. We subsequently questioned the degree to which these three proxies of soil health depended on biotic and abiotic properties of the soils. Across the 36 rice farms, key soil properties exhibited substantial variation, with pH ranging from 3.94 to 7.37, sand content from 9.06 % to 53.50 %, soil organic carbon from 0.53 to 3.39 g/kg, phosphorus from 7.77 to 57.68 mg/kg. We observed that PLFA markers were predominantly driven by soil nutrient availability of C (Soil organic carbon), N (Total nitrogen and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N) and P, as well as soil pH and sand content. The soil properties accounted for 4.6 % of the variability in PLFA markers and were strongly associated with them. Briefly, high nutrient availability of C, N and P would increase the abundance of soil microbes. In addition, abiotic soil properties (pH, Olsen-Phosphorus, ammonium and soil sand content) and PLFA markers (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, fungi; bacteria; total microbial biomass) made comparable (13.3 and 11.7 %, respectively) contributions (i.e. variation partitioning) to the functioning of the ecosystems. We thus propose that maintaining soil health requires the simultaneous consideration of both abiotic and biotic variables.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Soil Ecology\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Soil Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325003610\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325003610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保持全世界土壤的健康是我们巩固人类进步的基础。土壤健康描述了土壤的功能能力,并取决于非生物特性和土壤生物群。土壤性质或土壤微生物在多大程度上决定土壤健康,以及土壤性质和土壤生物群对土壤健康的贡献是否重叠,仍不确定。我们通过三个生态系统过程评估了非生物特性、plfa和管理实践在确定土壤健康方面的相对贡献。我们特别评估了非生物变量(0-10厘米深度)和常见磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)标记物如何在36个集约化管理的小农农场网络中决定土壤健康。实验设计为3个小区(即3个村庄)和1个操作的小区设计,无论农场是否经历了中间休耕期。我们提取了土壤健康与三个生态系统过程(生态系统功能的代表)、作物产量(kg/亩)、水稳定聚集(WSA, %)和分解的关系,利用绿茶包和路易波士茶包的30天原位失重进行评估,分别于2022年11月和2023年8月进行了两次试验。我们随后质疑土壤健康的这三个指标在多大程度上取决于土壤的生物和非生物特性。36个水稻田土壤主要性状差异较大,pH值在3.94 ~ 7.37之间,含沙量在9.06% ~ 53.50%之间,土壤有机碳在0.53 ~ 3.39 g/kg之间,磷在7.77 ~ 57.68 mg/kg之间。我们发现,PLFA标记主要受土壤C(土壤有机碳)、N(全氮和NH4+-N)和P的养分有效性以及土壤pH和沙粒含量驱动。土壤性质占PLFA标记变异的4.6%,并与之密切相关。简而言之,高的C、N、P养分有效性会增加土壤微生物的丰度。此外,非生物土壤性质(pH、olsen -磷、铵和土壤砂含量)和PLFA标记(丛枝菌根真菌、真菌;细菌;总微生物生物量对生态系统功能的贡献(即变异分配)相当(分别为13.3%和11.7%)。因此,我们建议保持土壤健康需要同时考虑非生物和生物变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative contributions of abiotic properties, soil microbes, and management practices to soil health in intensively managed rice paddies
Preserving the health of soils worldwide is the grounds on which we can solidify human progress. Soil health describes the capacity of soils to function and depends on both abiotic properties and soil biota. The degree to which soil properties or soil microbes dictate soil health, as well as whether the contributions of soil properties and soil biota to soil health overlap, remain uncertain. We address here the relative contributions of abiotic properties, PLFAs and management practices in determining soil health, which we assessed via three ecosystem processes. We specifically evaluated how the abiotic variables (0–10 cm depth) and common phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) markers determined soil health over a network of 36 intensively managed smallholder farms. The experimental design was a block design with three blocks (i.e. three villages) and one manipulation, whether the farms undergone an intermediate fallow period. We abstracted soil health in relation to three ecosystem processes (proxies of ecosystem functioning), crop yield (kg/mu), water stable aggregation (WSA, %) and decomposition, assessed using the in situ 30-day weight loss of green and rooibos tea bags, assayed twice in November 2022, and August 2023. We subsequently questioned the degree to which these three proxies of soil health depended on biotic and abiotic properties of the soils. Across the 36 rice farms, key soil properties exhibited substantial variation, with pH ranging from 3.94 to 7.37, sand content from 9.06 % to 53.50 %, soil organic carbon from 0.53 to 3.39 g/kg, phosphorus from 7.77 to 57.68 mg/kg. We observed that PLFA markers were predominantly driven by soil nutrient availability of C (Soil organic carbon), N (Total nitrogen and NH4+-N) and P, as well as soil pH and sand content. The soil properties accounted for 4.6 % of the variability in PLFA markers and were strongly associated with them. Briefly, high nutrient availability of C, N and P would increase the abundance of soil microbes. In addition, abiotic soil properties (pH, Olsen-Phosphorus, ammonium and soil sand content) and PLFA markers (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, fungi; bacteria; total microbial biomass) made comparable (13.3 and 11.7 %, respectively) contributions (i.e. variation partitioning) to the functioning of the ecosystems. We thus propose that maintaining soil health requires the simultaneous consideration of both abiotic and biotic variables.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信