Nhu Anh Phan , Hans Hellsmark , Lisa Göransson , Filip Johnsson
{"title":"电气化的紧张关系:利益相关者对瑞典工业和交通电气化的叙述","authors":"Nhu Anh Phan , Hans Hellsmark , Lisa Göransson , Filip Johnsson","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Large-scale electrification of industry and transport is central to the decarbonization of the energy sector. Rapid transformation of the existing electricity system, however, presents significant challenges. Using the Q-methodology, this study examines challenges to the electrification of industry and transport in Sweden from the viewpoints of key stakeholders. We identify three narratives that correspond to <em>meta-challenges</em> to electrification: 1) <em>Procedural deadlocks, hindering the expansion of variable electricity production</em>, 2) <em>Competing political preferences, slowing the progress of electrification</em>, and 3) <em>Poor governance, hindering an effective electrification process</em>. From these, we propose corresponding policy elements: 1) Streamlining the permitting process for electricity generation; 2) Fostering a fair but differentiated low-carbon policy mix; and 3) Recognizing multi-partisan benefits in the energy transition. These findings aim to support policymakers in developing effective decarbonization policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 104142"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrifying tensions: Stakeholder narratives to electrification of industry and transport in Sweden\",\"authors\":\"Nhu Anh Phan , Hans Hellsmark , Lisa Göransson , Filip Johnsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Large-scale electrification of industry and transport is central to the decarbonization of the energy sector. Rapid transformation of the existing electricity system, however, presents significant challenges. Using the Q-methodology, this study examines challenges to the electrification of industry and transport in Sweden from the viewpoints of key stakeholders. We identify three narratives that correspond to <em>meta-challenges</em> to electrification: 1) <em>Procedural deadlocks, hindering the expansion of variable electricity production</em>, 2) <em>Competing political preferences, slowing the progress of electrification</em>, and 3) <em>Poor governance, hindering an effective electrification process</em>. From these, we propose corresponding policy elements: 1) Streamlining the permitting process for electricity generation; 2) Fostering a fair but differentiated low-carbon policy mix; and 3) Recognizing multi-partisan benefits in the energy transition. These findings aim to support policymakers in developing effective decarbonization policies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"126 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002233\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002233","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electrifying tensions: Stakeholder narratives to electrification of industry and transport in Sweden
Large-scale electrification of industry and transport is central to the decarbonization of the energy sector. Rapid transformation of the existing electricity system, however, presents significant challenges. Using the Q-methodology, this study examines challenges to the electrification of industry and transport in Sweden from the viewpoints of key stakeholders. We identify three narratives that correspond to meta-challenges to electrification: 1) Procedural deadlocks, hindering the expansion of variable electricity production, 2) Competing political preferences, slowing the progress of electrification, and 3) Poor governance, hindering an effective electrification process. From these, we propose corresponding policy elements: 1) Streamlining the permitting process for electricity generation; 2) Fostering a fair but differentiated low-carbon policy mix; and 3) Recognizing multi-partisan benefits in the energy transition. These findings aim to support policymakers in developing effective decarbonization policies.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.