电气化的紧张关系:利益相关者对瑞典工业和交通电气化的叙述

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Nhu Anh Phan , Hans Hellsmark , Lisa Göransson , Filip Johnsson
{"title":"电气化的紧张关系:利益相关者对瑞典工业和交通电气化的叙述","authors":"Nhu Anh Phan ,&nbsp;Hans Hellsmark ,&nbsp;Lisa Göransson ,&nbsp;Filip Johnsson","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Large-scale electrification of industry and transport is central to the decarbonization of the energy sector. Rapid transformation of the existing electricity system, however, presents significant challenges. Using the Q-methodology, this study examines challenges to the electrification of industry and transport in Sweden from the viewpoints of key stakeholders. We identify three narratives that correspond to <em>meta-challenges</em> to electrification: 1) <em>Procedural deadlocks, hindering the expansion of variable electricity production</em>, 2) <em>Competing political preferences, slowing the progress of electrification</em>, and 3) <em>Poor governance, hindering an effective electrification process</em>. From these, we propose corresponding policy elements: 1) Streamlining the permitting process for electricity generation; 2) Fostering a fair but differentiated low-carbon policy mix; and 3) Recognizing multi-partisan benefits in the energy transition. These findings aim to support policymakers in developing effective decarbonization policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 104142"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrifying tensions: Stakeholder narratives to electrification of industry and transport in Sweden\",\"authors\":\"Nhu Anh Phan ,&nbsp;Hans Hellsmark ,&nbsp;Lisa Göransson ,&nbsp;Filip Johnsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Large-scale electrification of industry and transport is central to the decarbonization of the energy sector. Rapid transformation of the existing electricity system, however, presents significant challenges. Using the Q-methodology, this study examines challenges to the electrification of industry and transport in Sweden from the viewpoints of key stakeholders. We identify three narratives that correspond to <em>meta-challenges</em> to electrification: 1) <em>Procedural deadlocks, hindering the expansion of variable electricity production</em>, 2) <em>Competing political preferences, slowing the progress of electrification</em>, and 3) <em>Poor governance, hindering an effective electrification process</em>. From these, we propose corresponding policy elements: 1) Streamlining the permitting process for electricity generation; 2) Fostering a fair but differentiated low-carbon policy mix; and 3) Recognizing multi-partisan benefits in the energy transition. These findings aim to support policymakers in developing effective decarbonization policies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"126 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002233\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002233","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工业和运输的大规模电气化是能源部门脱碳的核心。然而,现有电力系统的快速转型带来了重大挑战。使用q方法,本研究从主要利益相关者的角度审视了瑞典工业和运输电气化面临的挑战。我们确定了与电气化元挑战相对应的三种叙述:1)程序僵局,阻碍可变电力生产的扩张;2)相互竞争的政治偏好,减缓电气化的进展;3)治理不善,阻碍有效的电气化进程。据此,我们提出了相应的政策要素:1)精简发电许可流程;2)形成公平但有区别的低碳政策组合;3)认识到能源转型中的多方利益。这些发现旨在支持决策者制定有效的脱碳政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electrifying tensions: Stakeholder narratives to electrification of industry and transport in Sweden
Large-scale electrification of industry and transport is central to the decarbonization of the energy sector. Rapid transformation of the existing electricity system, however, presents significant challenges. Using the Q-methodology, this study examines challenges to the electrification of industry and transport in Sweden from the viewpoints of key stakeholders. We identify three narratives that correspond to meta-challenges to electrification: 1) Procedural deadlocks, hindering the expansion of variable electricity production, 2) Competing political preferences, slowing the progress of electrification, and 3) Poor governance, hindering an effective electrification process. From these, we propose corresponding policy elements: 1) Streamlining the permitting process for electricity generation; 2) Fostering a fair but differentiated low-carbon policy mix; and 3) Recognizing multi-partisan benefits in the energy transition. These findings aim to support policymakers in developing effective decarbonization policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信