Pupin Liu , Zhejun Xu , Mingyu Su , Jianshe Chen , Xinmiao Wang
{"title":"在固体模型食物的口腔加工过程中,咀嚼效率在香气释放和感知中的作用","authors":"Pupin Liu , Zhejun Xu , Mingyu Su , Jianshe Chen , Xinmiao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the oral processing mechanisms underlying aroma release and perception during the chewing of solid model food particles (made from dental impression materials) in individuals with different chewing efficiency. By comparing the dynamic processes of model food particle breakdown, salivary secretion, protein concentration, and aroma release, it was found that individuals with higher chewing efficiency (‘high CE’ group) exhibited higher aroma release, with increased and longer perceived intensity. Increased chewing cycles were found to promote aroma release. However, this relationship varied between participants different chewing efficiency (‘high CE’ group vs. ‘low CE’ group), reflecting the underlying differences in their oral physiology (including model food mechanical breakdown, saliva secretion upon stimulation, and total salivary protein content during chewing). The hydrophobicity of aroma compounds (ethyl acetate vs. ethyl octanoate) undoubtedly affected both aroma release and perception during mastication. Unlike existing static headspace analysis studies, associations found from this study resulted from the multiple interplay of hydrogen bonds/hydrophobic interactions between aroma compounds and saliva proteins, mastication-induced saliva dilution effects, and the available release surface area due to chewing efficiency. Findings from this study provide novel insights into how individual differences in oral physiology and chewing efficiency—independent of the complex interactions between saliva and food matrices—impact aroma perception, and offer important implications for personalized food formulation and sensory perception optimization, particularly for populations with impaired oral processing abilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 105598"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of chewing efficiency in aroma release and perception during oral processing of solid model foods\",\"authors\":\"Pupin Liu , Zhejun Xu , Mingyu Su , Jianshe Chen , Xinmiao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the oral processing mechanisms underlying aroma release and perception during the chewing of solid model food particles (made from dental impression materials) in individuals with different chewing efficiency. By comparing the dynamic processes of model food particle breakdown, salivary secretion, protein concentration, and aroma release, it was found that individuals with higher chewing efficiency (‘high CE’ group) exhibited higher aroma release, with increased and longer perceived intensity. Increased chewing cycles were found to promote aroma release. However, this relationship varied between participants different chewing efficiency (‘high CE’ group vs. ‘low CE’ group), reflecting the underlying differences in their oral physiology (including model food mechanical breakdown, saliva secretion upon stimulation, and total salivary protein content during chewing). The hydrophobicity of aroma compounds (ethyl acetate vs. ethyl octanoate) undoubtedly affected both aroma release and perception during mastication. Unlike existing static headspace analysis studies, associations found from this study resulted from the multiple interplay of hydrogen bonds/hydrophobic interactions between aroma compounds and saliva proteins, mastication-induced saliva dilution effects, and the available release surface area due to chewing efficiency. Findings from this study provide novel insights into how individual differences in oral physiology and chewing efficiency—independent of the complex interactions between saliva and food matrices—impact aroma perception, and offer important implications for personalized food formulation and sensory perception optimization, particularly for populations with impaired oral processing abilities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325001739\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325001739","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of chewing efficiency in aroma release and perception during oral processing of solid model foods
This study investigates the oral processing mechanisms underlying aroma release and perception during the chewing of solid model food particles (made from dental impression materials) in individuals with different chewing efficiency. By comparing the dynamic processes of model food particle breakdown, salivary secretion, protein concentration, and aroma release, it was found that individuals with higher chewing efficiency (‘high CE’ group) exhibited higher aroma release, with increased and longer perceived intensity. Increased chewing cycles were found to promote aroma release. However, this relationship varied between participants different chewing efficiency (‘high CE’ group vs. ‘low CE’ group), reflecting the underlying differences in their oral physiology (including model food mechanical breakdown, saliva secretion upon stimulation, and total salivary protein content during chewing). The hydrophobicity of aroma compounds (ethyl acetate vs. ethyl octanoate) undoubtedly affected both aroma release and perception during mastication. Unlike existing static headspace analysis studies, associations found from this study resulted from the multiple interplay of hydrogen bonds/hydrophobic interactions between aroma compounds and saliva proteins, mastication-induced saliva dilution effects, and the available release surface area due to chewing efficiency. Findings from this study provide novel insights into how individual differences in oral physiology and chewing efficiency—independent of the complex interactions between saliva and food matrices—impact aroma perception, and offer important implications for personalized food formulation and sensory perception optimization, particularly for populations with impaired oral processing abilities.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.