Alexandr A. Kalinin, John Arevalo, Erik Serrano, Loan Vulliard, Hillary Tsang, Michael Bornholdt, Alán F. Muñoz, Suganya Sivagurunathan, Bartek Rajwa, Anne E. Carpenter, Gregory P. Way, Shantanu Singh
{"title":"一个用于评估轮廓强度和相似度的通用信息检索框架","authors":"Alexandr A. Kalinin, John Arevalo, Erik Serrano, Loan Vulliard, Hillary Tsang, Michael Bornholdt, Alán F. Muñoz, Suganya Sivagurunathan, Bartek Rajwa, Anne E. Carpenter, Gregory P. Way, Shantanu Singh","doi":"10.1038/s41467-025-60306-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Large-scale profiling assays capture a cell population’s state by measuring thousands of biological properties per cell or sample. However, evaluating profile strength and similarity remains challenging due to the high dimensionality and non-linear, heterogeneous nature of measurements. Here, we develop a statistical framework using mean average precision (mAP) as a single, data-driven metric to address this challenge. We validate the mAP framework against established metrics through simulations and real-world data, revealing its ability to capture subtle and meaningful biological differences in cell state. Specifically, we use mAP to assess a sample’s phenotypic activity relative to controls, as well as the phenotypic consistency of groups of perturbations (or samples). We evaluate the framework across diverse datasets and on different profile types (image, protein, mRNA), perturbations (CRISPR, gene overexpression, small molecules), and resolutions (single-cell, bulk). The mAP framework, together with our open-source software package <i>copairs</i>, is useful for evaluating high-dimensional profiling data in biological research and drug discovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19066,"journal":{"name":"Nature Communications","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A versatile information retrieval framework for evaluating profile strength and similarity\",\"authors\":\"Alexandr A. Kalinin, John Arevalo, Erik Serrano, Loan Vulliard, Hillary Tsang, Michael Bornholdt, Alán F. Muñoz, Suganya Sivagurunathan, Bartek Rajwa, Anne E. Carpenter, Gregory P. Way, Shantanu Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41467-025-60306-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Large-scale profiling assays capture a cell population’s state by measuring thousands of biological properties per cell or sample. However, evaluating profile strength and similarity remains challenging due to the high dimensionality and non-linear, heterogeneous nature of measurements. Here, we develop a statistical framework using mean average precision (mAP) as a single, data-driven metric to address this challenge. We validate the mAP framework against established metrics through simulations and real-world data, revealing its ability to capture subtle and meaningful biological differences in cell state. Specifically, we use mAP to assess a sample’s phenotypic activity relative to controls, as well as the phenotypic consistency of groups of perturbations (or samples). We evaluate the framework across diverse datasets and on different profile types (image, protein, mRNA), perturbations (CRISPR, gene overexpression, small molecules), and resolutions (single-cell, bulk). The mAP framework, together with our open-source software package <i>copairs</i>, is useful for evaluating high-dimensional profiling data in biological research and drug discovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Communications\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60306-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Communications","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60306-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A versatile information retrieval framework for evaluating profile strength and similarity
Large-scale profiling assays capture a cell population’s state by measuring thousands of biological properties per cell or sample. However, evaluating profile strength and similarity remains challenging due to the high dimensionality and non-linear, heterogeneous nature of measurements. Here, we develop a statistical framework using mean average precision (mAP) as a single, data-driven metric to address this challenge. We validate the mAP framework against established metrics through simulations and real-world data, revealing its ability to capture subtle and meaningful biological differences in cell state. Specifically, we use mAP to assess a sample’s phenotypic activity relative to controls, as well as the phenotypic consistency of groups of perturbations (or samples). We evaluate the framework across diverse datasets and on different profile types (image, protein, mRNA), perturbations (CRISPR, gene overexpression, small molecules), and resolutions (single-cell, bulk). The mAP framework, together with our open-source software package copairs, is useful for evaluating high-dimensional profiling data in biological research and drug discovery.
期刊介绍:
Nature Communications, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research spanning all areas of the natural sciences. Papers featured in the journal showcase significant advances relevant to specialists in each respective field. With a 2-year impact factor of 16.6 (2022) and a median time of 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision, Nature Communications is committed to rapid dissemination of research findings. As a multidisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions from biological, health, physical, chemical, Earth, social, mathematical, applied, and engineering sciences, aiming to highlight important breakthroughs within each domain.