利用具有选择性抗菌作用的自然疗法漱口水对抗多种口腔生物膜,以防止生态失调。

IF 3 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Frontiers in oral health Pub Date : 2025-05-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/froh.2025.1529061
Danyal A Siddiqui, Yi-Wen C Tsai, Juliana Giron Bastidas, Marzieh S Jazaeri, Georgios A Kotsakis
{"title":"利用具有选择性抗菌作用的自然疗法漱口水对抗多种口腔生物膜,以防止生态失调。","authors":"Danyal A Siddiqui, Yi-Wen C Tsai, Juliana Giron Bastidas, Marzieh S Jazaeri, Georgios A Kotsakis","doi":"10.3389/froh.2025.1529061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral rinses intended for the prevention and treatment of periodontal diseases have traditionally focused on bactericidal effects. This study evaluates the efficacy of a naturopathic mouthwash containing plant attenuations and propolis against common gram- pathogenic and gram+ commensal oral species in comparison to conventional antiseptic oral rinses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><i>Streptoccoccus oralis, Streptococcus gordonii, Veillonella parvula, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Porphyromonas gingivalis</i> were cultured and treated with naturopathic StellaLife® VEGA® Oral Rinse (SL), 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), LISTERINE® COOL MINT® mouthwash (LIS), or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as negative control. Firstly, planktonic bacterial growth was assessed through optical density measurements and colony-forming unit (CFU) counts. Subsequently, a 4-species or clinical ex vivo multispecies biofilm was used to evaluate antibiofilm effects through selective agar plating and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or live-dead biofilm imaging, respectively. Lastly, cytocompatibility to oral rinses was tested using a 3D human fibroblast spheroid model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SL significantly inhibited the growth of disease-associated <i>F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis</i> 12 and 120 h, respectively, after treatment, while exhibiting lower toxicity toward commensal <i>S. oralis, S. gordonii</i>, and <i>V. parvula</i> vs. <i>LIS</i> or CHX (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Correspondingly, in 4-species biofilms, selective agar plating and FISH-staining showed decreased abundance of <i>F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis</i> after 4 h recovery following SL treatment vs. PBS control while maintaining a robust commensal biofilm of <i>S. oralis and V. parvula</i>. In contrast, CHX or LIS treatment demonstrated non-selective killing, leading to sparse biofilms with residual <i>F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis</i>. When tested against clinical ex vivo multispecies biofilms, all oral rinses showed significant antibiofilm effects (all <i>p</i> < 0.001), disrupting biofilm structure and reducing bacterial viability. Lastly, 3D human fibroblast spheroids treated with CHX or LIS displayed greater cytotoxicity with detachment of cellular debris from the spheroid mass, while spheroids exposed to SL exhibited minimal cell death with cellular viability maintained across the spheroid structure.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The SL homeopathic rinse demonstrated selective action on oral bacteria, preferentially reducing pathogen bacterial load while preserving commensal species with high cytocompatibility. Future validation in human studies is needed to assess its selective antimicrobial activity to maintain a eubiotic oral microbiome and explore broader applications in oral health.</p>","PeriodicalId":94016,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in oral health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1529061"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12127372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing a naturopathic mouthwash with selective antimicrobial effects against multispecies oral biofilms for prevention of dysbiosis.\",\"authors\":\"Danyal A Siddiqui, Yi-Wen C Tsai, Juliana Giron Bastidas, Marzieh S Jazaeri, Georgios A Kotsakis\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/froh.2025.1529061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral rinses intended for the prevention and treatment of periodontal diseases have traditionally focused on bactericidal effects. This study evaluates the efficacy of a naturopathic mouthwash containing plant attenuations and propolis against common gram- pathogenic and gram+ commensal oral species in comparison to conventional antiseptic oral rinses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><i>Streptoccoccus oralis, Streptococcus gordonii, Veillonella parvula, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Porphyromonas gingivalis</i> were cultured and treated with naturopathic StellaLife® VEGA® Oral Rinse (SL), 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), LISTERINE® COOL MINT® mouthwash (LIS), or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as negative control. Firstly, planktonic bacterial growth was assessed through optical density measurements and colony-forming unit (CFU) counts. Subsequently, a 4-species or clinical ex vivo multispecies biofilm was used to evaluate antibiofilm effects through selective agar plating and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or live-dead biofilm imaging, respectively. Lastly, cytocompatibility to oral rinses was tested using a 3D human fibroblast spheroid model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SL significantly inhibited the growth of disease-associated <i>F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis</i> 12 and 120 h, respectively, after treatment, while exhibiting lower toxicity toward commensal <i>S. oralis, S. gordonii</i>, and <i>V. parvula</i> vs. <i>LIS</i> or CHX (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Correspondingly, in 4-species biofilms, selective agar plating and FISH-staining showed decreased abundance of <i>F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis</i> after 4 h recovery following SL treatment vs. PBS control while maintaining a robust commensal biofilm of <i>S. oralis and V. parvula</i>. In contrast, CHX or LIS treatment demonstrated non-selective killing, leading to sparse biofilms with residual <i>F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis</i>. When tested against clinical ex vivo multispecies biofilms, all oral rinses showed significant antibiofilm effects (all <i>p</i> < 0.001), disrupting biofilm structure and reducing bacterial viability. Lastly, 3D human fibroblast spheroids treated with CHX or LIS displayed greater cytotoxicity with detachment of cellular debris from the spheroid mass, while spheroids exposed to SL exhibited minimal cell death with cellular viability maintained across the spheroid structure.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The SL homeopathic rinse demonstrated selective action on oral bacteria, preferentially reducing pathogen bacterial load while preserving commensal species with high cytocompatibility. Future validation in human studies is needed to assess its selective antimicrobial activity to maintain a eubiotic oral microbiome and explore broader applications in oral health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in oral health\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1529061\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12127372/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in oral health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2025.1529061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in oral health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2025.1529061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于预防和治疗牙周病的口腔冲洗液传统上侧重于杀菌效果。本研究评估了含有植物减毒剂和蜂胶的自然疗法漱口水对常见革兰氏致病性和革兰氏共生口腔物种的功效,并与传统的防腐口腔漱口水进行了比较。方法:培养口腔链球菌、戈多氏链球菌、小叶细络菌、核梭菌和牙龈卟啉单胞菌,分别用自然疗法的StellaLife®VEGA®口腔冲洗液(SL)、0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHX)、李斯德林®COOL MINT®漱口水(LIS)或磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)作为阴性对照。首先,通过光密度测量和菌落形成单位(CFU)计数来评估浮游细菌的生长情况。随后,采用4种或临床离体多种生物膜,分别通过选择性琼脂电镀、荧光原位杂交(FISH)或活死生物膜成像来评估抗生物膜的效果。最后,使用三维人成纤维细胞球形模型测试口腔冲洗液的细胞相容性。结果:SL在治疗12 h和120 h后分别显著抑制疾病相关核核梭菌和牙龈卟啉单胞菌的生长,而对共生口腔梭菌、戈登梭菌和小叶梭菌的毒性低于LIS或CHX(均p < 0.05)。相应的,在4种生物膜中,选择性琼脂镀和fish染色显示,与PBS对照相比,SL处理后4小时恢复后,口腔链球菌和小叶弧菌的共生生物膜保持强劲,但核梭菌和牙龈弧菌的丰度下降。相比之下,CHX或LIS处理表现出非选择性杀伤,导致生物膜稀疏,残留有核仁假丝酵母和牙龈假丝酵母。当对临床离体多物种生物膜进行测试时,所有口腔冲洗液都显示出显著的抗生物膜作用(均p < 0.001),破坏生物膜结构并降低细菌活力。最后,用CHX或LIS处理的3D人成纤维细胞球体显示出更大的细胞毒性,细胞碎片从球体团块脱落,而暴露于SL的球体显示出最小的细胞死亡,整个球体结构保持细胞活力。讨论:SL顺势疗法漱口水显示出对口腔细菌的选择性作用,优先减少病原体细菌负荷,同时保留具有高细胞相容性的共生物种。未来需要在人体研究中进行验证,以评估其选择性抗菌活性,以维持口腔益生菌群,并探索在口腔健康方面的更广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilizing a naturopathic mouthwash with selective antimicrobial effects against multispecies oral biofilms for prevention of dysbiosis.

Introduction: Oral rinses intended for the prevention and treatment of periodontal diseases have traditionally focused on bactericidal effects. This study evaluates the efficacy of a naturopathic mouthwash containing plant attenuations and propolis against common gram- pathogenic and gram+ commensal oral species in comparison to conventional antiseptic oral rinses.

Methods: Streptoccoccus oralis, Streptococcus gordonii, Veillonella parvula, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Porphyromonas gingivalis were cultured and treated with naturopathic StellaLife® VEGA® Oral Rinse (SL), 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), LISTERINE® COOL MINT® mouthwash (LIS), or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as negative control. Firstly, planktonic bacterial growth was assessed through optical density measurements and colony-forming unit (CFU) counts. Subsequently, a 4-species or clinical ex vivo multispecies biofilm was used to evaluate antibiofilm effects through selective agar plating and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or live-dead biofilm imaging, respectively. Lastly, cytocompatibility to oral rinses was tested using a 3D human fibroblast spheroid model.

Results: SL significantly inhibited the growth of disease-associated F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis 12 and 120 h, respectively, after treatment, while exhibiting lower toxicity toward commensal S. oralis, S. gordonii, and V. parvula vs. LIS or CHX (all p < 0.05). Correspondingly, in 4-species biofilms, selective agar plating and FISH-staining showed decreased abundance of F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis after 4 h recovery following SL treatment vs. PBS control while maintaining a robust commensal biofilm of S. oralis and V. parvula. In contrast, CHX or LIS treatment demonstrated non-selective killing, leading to sparse biofilms with residual F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis. When tested against clinical ex vivo multispecies biofilms, all oral rinses showed significant antibiofilm effects (all p < 0.001), disrupting biofilm structure and reducing bacterial viability. Lastly, 3D human fibroblast spheroids treated with CHX or LIS displayed greater cytotoxicity with detachment of cellular debris from the spheroid mass, while spheroids exposed to SL exhibited minimal cell death with cellular viability maintained across the spheroid structure.

Discussion: The SL homeopathic rinse demonstrated selective action on oral bacteria, preferentially reducing pathogen bacterial load while preserving commensal species with high cytocompatibility. Future validation in human studies is needed to assess its selective antimicrobial activity to maintain a eubiotic oral microbiome and explore broader applications in oral health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信