约翰内斯堡一家学术医院一线护士在护理服务中遵守COVID-19政策的情况。

Fhulufhelo Mulaudzi, Charlene Downing
{"title":"约翰内斯堡一家学术医院一线护士在护理服务中遵守COVID-19政策的情况。","authors":"Fhulufhelo Mulaudzi, Charlene Downing","doi":"10.4102/curationis.v48i1.2685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Nurses' adherence to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) policies significantly impacts infection rates, yet various factors, including communication gaps, lack of policy involvement and insufficient training, hinder compliance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This study investigated the availability of COVID-19 infection control policies and frontline nurses' adherence to these policies at an academic hospital in Johannesburg.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> A quantitative, descriptive-comparative design was employed, using stratified random sampling across three phases: policy document analysis, adherence assessment and observation. Phase one evaluated the comprehensiveness of policies from National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), Department of Health (DoH) (SA), National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Centers ffor Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> National Institute for Communicable Diseases, DoH and academic hospital policies were 100% adequate, while CDC and NIH policies met 82% of assessed attributes. Phases two and three assessed adherence using questionnaires and observations. Results revealed higher adherence during direct patient contact (median 5/7; 70%) compared to pre- and post-contact behaviours (median 3/6; 50%). Principal component analysis showed a strong correlation (r = 0.903) between adherence and general precautionary measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Despite partial compliance, findings highlight a need for enhanced in-service training and improved communication strategies to promote policy adherence and minimise infection risks.Contribution: Recommendations are provided to strengthen nursing practice, education and policy development, empowering nurses with knowledge and strategies for effective infection control.</p>","PeriodicalId":93959,"journal":{"name":"Curationis","volume":"48 1","pages":"e1-e9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frontline nurses' adherence to COVID-19 policies in care delivery at a Johannesburg Academic Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Fhulufhelo Mulaudzi, Charlene Downing\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/curationis.v48i1.2685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Nurses' adherence to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) policies significantly impacts infection rates, yet various factors, including communication gaps, lack of policy involvement and insufficient training, hinder compliance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This study investigated the availability of COVID-19 infection control policies and frontline nurses' adherence to these policies at an academic hospital in Johannesburg.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> A quantitative, descriptive-comparative design was employed, using stratified random sampling across three phases: policy document analysis, adherence assessment and observation. Phase one evaluated the comprehensiveness of policies from National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), Department of Health (DoH) (SA), National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Centers ffor Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> National Institute for Communicable Diseases, DoH and academic hospital policies were 100% adequate, while CDC and NIH policies met 82% of assessed attributes. Phases two and three assessed adherence using questionnaires and observations. Results revealed higher adherence during direct patient contact (median 5/7; 70%) compared to pre- and post-contact behaviours (median 3/6; 50%). Principal component analysis showed a strong correlation (r = 0.903) between adherence and general precautionary measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Despite partial compliance, findings highlight a need for enhanced in-service training and improved communication strategies to promote policy adherence and minimise infection risks.Contribution: Recommendations are provided to strengthen nursing practice, education and policy development, empowering nurses with knowledge and strategies for effective infection control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curationis\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"e1-e9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135095/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curationis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v48i1.2685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curationis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v48i1.2685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护士对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)政策的遵守显著影响了感染率,但沟通差距、缺乏政策参与和培训不足等各种因素阻碍了依从性。目的:本研究调查了约翰内斯堡一家学术医院COVID-19感染控制政策的可得性和一线护士对这些政策的遵守情况。方法:采用定量、描述性比较设计,分层随机抽样,分为政策文件分析、依从性评估和观察三个阶段。第一阶段评估了国家传染病研究所(NICD)、卫生部(DoH) (SA)、国家卫生研究院(NIH)和疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)政策的全面性。结果:国家传染病研究所、卫生部和学术医院的政策是100%适当的,而CDC和NIH的政策满足82%的评估属性。第二和第三阶段使用问卷调查和观察来评估依从性。结果显示直接接触患者时依从性更高(中位数5/7;70%),而接触前和接触后的行为(中位数为3/6;50%)。主成分分析显示依从性与一般预防措施之间有很强的相关性(r = 0.903)。结论:尽管有部分依从性,但研究结果强调需要加强在职培训和改进沟通策略,以促进政策遵守并最大限度地降低感染风险。贡献:提供建议以加强护理实践、教育和政策制定,赋予护士有效控制感染的知识和策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frontline nurses' adherence to COVID-19 policies in care delivery at a Johannesburg Academic Hospital.

Background:  Nurses' adherence to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) policies significantly impacts infection rates, yet various factors, including communication gaps, lack of policy involvement and insufficient training, hinder compliance.

Objectives:  This study investigated the availability of COVID-19 infection control policies and frontline nurses' adherence to these policies at an academic hospital in Johannesburg.

Method:  A quantitative, descriptive-comparative design was employed, using stratified random sampling across three phases: policy document analysis, adherence assessment and observation. Phase one evaluated the comprehensiveness of policies from National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), Department of Health (DoH) (SA), National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Centers ffor Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Results:  National Institute for Communicable Diseases, DoH and academic hospital policies were 100% adequate, while CDC and NIH policies met 82% of assessed attributes. Phases two and three assessed adherence using questionnaires and observations. Results revealed higher adherence during direct patient contact (median 5/7; 70%) compared to pre- and post-contact behaviours (median 3/6; 50%). Principal component analysis showed a strong correlation (r = 0.903) between adherence and general precautionary measures.

Conclusion:  Despite partial compliance, findings highlight a need for enhanced in-service training and improved communication strategies to promote policy adherence and minimise infection risks.Contribution: Recommendations are provided to strengthen nursing practice, education and policy development, empowering nurses with knowledge and strategies for effective infection control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信