比较基于临床和运动学的注射肉毒杆菌毒素治疗宫颈肌张力障碍。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Olivia Samotus, Keith Sequeira, Mandar Jog
{"title":"比较基于临床和运动学的注射肉毒杆菌毒素治疗宫颈肌张力障碍。","authors":"Olivia Samotus, Keith Sequeira, Mandar Jog","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2025.10109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recognizing cervical dystonia (CD) movement patterns for appropriate botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) pattern determination depends on clinical expertise. Kinematic analysis objectively measures dystonic neck movements, and whether BoNT-A patterns determined solely using kinematics can effectively treat CD symptoms was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two BoNT-A-naïve CD participants were randomized to receive three BoNT-A injections determined clinically (\"cb\") or by kinematic-based assessment (\"kb\"). Outcomes included the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and kinematic measures of CD motor symptoms (tonic deviation and dynamic movements) at re-injection (weeks 12, 24) and peak effect (weeks 6, 18, 30) compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean tonic deviation that returned to neutral was observed in 47% of \"kb\" and 31% of \"cb\" participants between weeks 6 and 30. Mean dynamic movements (root mean square amplitude) were significantly reduced in the \"kb\" group between weeks 12 and 30 compared to baseline. TWSTRS total score and motor severity were significantly reduced in the \"cb\" group, and disability sub-score was significantly reduced in both groups for all subsequent injections. Treatment-related side effects occurred in two \"cb\" and four \"kb\" participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study indicates that kinematic-based BoNT-A injection patterns can effectively reduce CD symptoms and disability, offering valuable guidance for both novice and experienced injectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":56134,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Clinical and Kinematic-Based Botulinum Toxin Injections for Cervical Dystonia Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Olivia Samotus, Keith Sequeira, Mandar Jog\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cjn.2025.10109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recognizing cervical dystonia (CD) movement patterns for appropriate botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) pattern determination depends on clinical expertise. Kinematic analysis objectively measures dystonic neck movements, and whether BoNT-A patterns determined solely using kinematics can effectively treat CD symptoms was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two BoNT-A-naïve CD participants were randomized to receive three BoNT-A injections determined clinically (\\\"cb\\\") or by kinematic-based assessment (\\\"kb\\\"). Outcomes included the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and kinematic measures of CD motor symptoms (tonic deviation and dynamic movements) at re-injection (weeks 12, 24) and peak effect (weeks 6, 18, 30) compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean tonic deviation that returned to neutral was observed in 47% of \\\"kb\\\" and 31% of \\\"cb\\\" participants between weeks 6 and 30. Mean dynamic movements (root mean square amplitude) were significantly reduced in the \\\"kb\\\" group between weeks 12 and 30 compared to baseline. TWSTRS total score and motor severity were significantly reduced in the \\\"cb\\\" group, and disability sub-score was significantly reduced in both groups for all subsequent injections. Treatment-related side effects occurred in two \\\"cb\\\" and four \\\"kb\\\" participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study indicates that kinematic-based BoNT-A injection patterns can effectively reduce CD symptoms and disability, offering valuable guidance for both novice and experienced injectors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2025.10109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2025.10109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:识别宫颈肌张力障碍(CD)的运动模式,以确定适当的A型肉毒杆菌毒素(BoNT-A)模式取决于临床专业知识。运动学分析客观地测量了颈部运动障碍,并研究了单独使用运动学确定的BoNT-A模式是否可以有效地治疗CD症状。方法:22名BoNT-A-naïve CD参与者随机接受三次BoNT-A注射,分别由临床(“cb”)或基于运动学的评估(“kb”)决定。结果包括多伦多西部痉挛性斜颈评定量表(TWSTRS)和再注射时CD运动症状(张力偏差和动态运动)的运动学测量(第12、24周)和与基线相比的峰值效应(第6、18、30周)。结果:在第6周至第30周之间,47%的kb参与者和31%的cb参与者观察到平均张力偏差恢复到中性。与基线相比,“kb”组在第12周至第30周期间的平均动态运动(均方根振幅)显著降低。“cb”组TWSTRS总分和运动严重程度均显著降低,两组后续注射的残疾分均显著降低。治疗相关的副作用发生在两名“cb”和四名“kb”参与者中。结论:该研究表明基于运动学的BoNT-A注射方式可以有效减少CD症状和残疾,为新手和经验丰富的注射者提供有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Clinical and Kinematic-Based Botulinum Toxin Injections for Cervical Dystonia Therapy.

Background: Recognizing cervical dystonia (CD) movement patterns for appropriate botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) pattern determination depends on clinical expertise. Kinematic analysis objectively measures dystonic neck movements, and whether BoNT-A patterns determined solely using kinematics can effectively treat CD symptoms was investigated.

Methods: Twenty-two BoNT-A-naïve CD participants were randomized to receive three BoNT-A injections determined clinically ("cb") or by kinematic-based assessment ("kb"). Outcomes included the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and kinematic measures of CD motor symptoms (tonic deviation and dynamic movements) at re-injection (weeks 12, 24) and peak effect (weeks 6, 18, 30) compared to baseline.

Results: Mean tonic deviation that returned to neutral was observed in 47% of "kb" and 31% of "cb" participants between weeks 6 and 30. Mean dynamic movements (root mean square amplitude) were significantly reduced in the "kb" group between weeks 12 and 30 compared to baseline. TWSTRS total score and motor severity were significantly reduced in the "cb" group, and disability sub-score was significantly reduced in both groups for all subsequent injections. Treatment-related side effects occurred in two "cb" and four "kb" participants.

Conclusion: The study indicates that kinematic-based BoNT-A injection patterns can effectively reduce CD symptoms and disability, offering valuable guidance for both novice and experienced injectors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is the official publication of the four member societies of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation -- Canadian Neurological Society (CNS), Canadian Association of Child Neurology (CACN), Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS), Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists (CSCN). The Journal is a widely circulated internationally recognized medical journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. The Journal is published in January, March, May, July, September, and November in an online only format. The first Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (the Journal) was published in 1974 in Winnipeg. In 1981, the Journal became the official publication of the member societies of the CNSF.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信