Seema Nasser, Zahra Alnasser, Ohoud Aljuhani, Aisha Alharbi, Johanna Rice, Abdullah F Alharthi, Raed Kensara, Faisal E Al Mutairi, Dalil Zaabee, Shuroug A Alowais, Nader Damfu, Samiah Alsohimi, Asma A Alshehri, Sultan Alotaibi, Marwah Bin Abdulqader, Saja Almarhoun, Najat Waggas, Munirah Alajmi, Nourah Alrashidi, Maher Alharbi, Mohammed Al Asiri, Ashjan Ali Hadadi, Haifa A Alhaidal, Ghaida Alahmari, Ahlam H Almutairi, Faisal A Alwadani, Abdullah M Musally, Reem A Mahboob, Dania T Bakor, Ramesh Vishwakarma, Khalid Al Sulaiman
{"title":"探索烧伤重症监护病房感染危险因素和多重耐药菌(MDROs):一项多中心病例对照研究。","authors":"Seema Nasser, Zahra Alnasser, Ohoud Aljuhani, Aisha Alharbi, Johanna Rice, Abdullah F Alharthi, Raed Kensara, Faisal E Al Mutairi, Dalil Zaabee, Shuroug A Alowais, Nader Damfu, Samiah Alsohimi, Asma A Alshehri, Sultan Alotaibi, Marwah Bin Abdulqader, Saja Almarhoun, Najat Waggas, Munirah Alajmi, Nourah Alrashidi, Maher Alharbi, Mohammed Al Asiri, Ashjan Ali Hadadi, Haifa A Alhaidal, Ghaida Alahmari, Ahlam H Almutairi, Faisal A Alwadani, Abdullah M Musally, Reem A Mahboob, Dania T Bakor, Ramesh Vishwakarma, Khalid Al Sulaiman","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.05.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the widespread incidence of MDRO within burn centers, there is a lack of research investigating infection risks in critically ill burn patients. This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with the acquisition of MDROs among critically ill burn patients admitted to the Burn ICU (BICU) and to determine the prevalence of MDROs in this population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a multicenter observational case-control study included adult patients (age≥18) admitted to BICU between January, 2015, to December, 2022. Patients were excluded if burn injury affected < 10% of the body surface area (BSA), died within 24 hours of ICU admission, unknown timing of burn injury, and history of MDRO within 1 year prior to admission or antibiotics use 3 months prior to admission. We identified the risk factors and prevalence of MDROs, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, 30-day mortality, and in-hospital mortality rates as the study outcomes. An exact matching approach with 1:1 ratio was used to match the groups based on age, gender, and admission year. Stepwise forward selection logistic and linear regression analyses were used when appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 173 patients were included, and only 168 patients were matched: 84 patients in the case group (MDR) were matched with 84 patients in the control group (non-MDR). Patients who had MDR organisms had lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) baseline (Unadjusted OR: 0.88, 95% CI [0.827, 0.944]), higher baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (Unadjusted OR: 1.19, 95% CI [1.069, 1.329]), APACHE II score (Unadjusted OR: 1.11, 95% CI [1.054, 1.161]), invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) status at admission (Unadjusted OR: 3.76, 95% CI [1.96, 7.20]), and higher total body surface area (TBSA) affected (Unadjusted OR: 1.04, 95% CI [1.024, 1.058]) compared to the non-MDR group. However, regression analysis showed that those with lower Baseline GCS (OR: 0.904, 95% CI [0.828, 0.987]), higher TBSA affected (OR: 1.023, 95% CI [1.002, 1.045]), and urinary tract infections (UTIs) (OR: 7.198, 95% CI [1.973, 26.259]) were significantly more prone to MDR infections. The most common isolated pathogens in the MDRO group was Acinetobacter baumannii (57%), while the most common infection was pneumonia (52.4%). The MDR group had significantly longer MV duration and ICU LOS (median: 12 vs. 0 days, P=0.0002) and (median: 28 vs. 17 days, P=0.0002), respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups in other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed a significantly increased risk of infections with MDRO in patients with burn who had larger TBSA burns, lower GCS, and higher SOFA and APACHE II scores. Future studies with larger sample size are needed to confirm our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Infection Risk Factors and Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) in Burn Intensive Care Units: A Multicenter Case-Control Study.\",\"authors\":\"Seema Nasser, Zahra Alnasser, Ohoud Aljuhani, Aisha Alharbi, Johanna Rice, Abdullah F Alharthi, Raed Kensara, Faisal E Al Mutairi, Dalil Zaabee, Shuroug A Alowais, Nader Damfu, Samiah Alsohimi, Asma A Alshehri, Sultan Alotaibi, Marwah Bin Abdulqader, Saja Almarhoun, Najat Waggas, Munirah Alajmi, Nourah Alrashidi, Maher Alharbi, Mohammed Al Asiri, Ashjan Ali Hadadi, Haifa A Alhaidal, Ghaida Alahmari, Ahlam H Almutairi, Faisal A Alwadani, Abdullah M Musally, Reem A Mahboob, Dania T Bakor, Ramesh Vishwakarma, Khalid Al Sulaiman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.05.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the widespread incidence of MDRO within burn centers, there is a lack of research investigating infection risks in critically ill burn patients. This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with the acquisition of MDROs among critically ill burn patients admitted to the Burn ICU (BICU) and to determine the prevalence of MDROs in this population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a multicenter observational case-control study included adult patients (age≥18) admitted to BICU between January, 2015, to December, 2022. Patients were excluded if burn injury affected < 10% of the body surface area (BSA), died within 24 hours of ICU admission, unknown timing of burn injury, and history of MDRO within 1 year prior to admission or antibiotics use 3 months prior to admission. We identified the risk factors and prevalence of MDROs, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, 30-day mortality, and in-hospital mortality rates as the study outcomes. An exact matching approach with 1:1 ratio was used to match the groups based on age, gender, and admission year. Stepwise forward selection logistic and linear regression analyses were used when appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 173 patients were included, and only 168 patients were matched: 84 patients in the case group (MDR) were matched with 84 patients in the control group (non-MDR). Patients who had MDR organisms had lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) baseline (Unadjusted OR: 0.88, 95% CI [0.827, 0.944]), higher baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (Unadjusted OR: 1.19, 95% CI [1.069, 1.329]), APACHE II score (Unadjusted OR: 1.11, 95% CI [1.054, 1.161]), invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) status at admission (Unadjusted OR: 3.76, 95% CI [1.96, 7.20]), and higher total body surface area (TBSA) affected (Unadjusted OR: 1.04, 95% CI [1.024, 1.058]) compared to the non-MDR group. However, regression analysis showed that those with lower Baseline GCS (OR: 0.904, 95% CI [0.828, 0.987]), higher TBSA affected (OR: 1.023, 95% CI [1.002, 1.045]), and urinary tract infections (UTIs) (OR: 7.198, 95% CI [1.973, 26.259]) were significantly more prone to MDR infections. The most common isolated pathogens in the MDRO group was Acinetobacter baumannii (57%), while the most common infection was pneumonia (52.4%). The MDR group had significantly longer MV duration and ICU LOS (median: 12 vs. 0 days, P=0.0002) and (median: 28 vs. 17 days, P=0.0002), respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups in other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed a significantly increased risk of infections with MDRO in patients with burn who had larger TBSA burns, lower GCS, and higher SOFA and APACHE II scores. Future studies with larger sample size are needed to confirm our results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2025.05.010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2025.05.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring Infection Risk Factors and Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) in Burn Intensive Care Units: A Multicenter Case-Control Study.
Background: Despite the widespread incidence of MDRO within burn centers, there is a lack of research investigating infection risks in critically ill burn patients. This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with the acquisition of MDROs among critically ill burn patients admitted to the Burn ICU (BICU) and to determine the prevalence of MDROs in this population.
Method: This was a multicenter observational case-control study included adult patients (age≥18) admitted to BICU between January, 2015, to December, 2022. Patients were excluded if burn injury affected < 10% of the body surface area (BSA), died within 24 hours of ICU admission, unknown timing of burn injury, and history of MDRO within 1 year prior to admission or antibiotics use 3 months prior to admission. We identified the risk factors and prevalence of MDROs, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, 30-day mortality, and in-hospital mortality rates as the study outcomes. An exact matching approach with 1:1 ratio was used to match the groups based on age, gender, and admission year. Stepwise forward selection logistic and linear regression analyses were used when appropriate.
Results: A total of 173 patients were included, and only 168 patients were matched: 84 patients in the case group (MDR) were matched with 84 patients in the control group (non-MDR). Patients who had MDR organisms had lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) baseline (Unadjusted OR: 0.88, 95% CI [0.827, 0.944]), higher baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (Unadjusted OR: 1.19, 95% CI [1.069, 1.329]), APACHE II score (Unadjusted OR: 1.11, 95% CI [1.054, 1.161]), invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) status at admission (Unadjusted OR: 3.76, 95% CI [1.96, 7.20]), and higher total body surface area (TBSA) affected (Unadjusted OR: 1.04, 95% CI [1.024, 1.058]) compared to the non-MDR group. However, regression analysis showed that those with lower Baseline GCS (OR: 0.904, 95% CI [0.828, 0.987]), higher TBSA affected (OR: 1.023, 95% CI [1.002, 1.045]), and urinary tract infections (UTIs) (OR: 7.198, 95% CI [1.973, 26.259]) were significantly more prone to MDR infections. The most common isolated pathogens in the MDRO group was Acinetobacter baumannii (57%), while the most common infection was pneumonia (52.4%). The MDR group had significantly longer MV duration and ICU LOS (median: 12 vs. 0 days, P=0.0002) and (median: 28 vs. 17 days, P=0.0002), respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups in other outcomes.
Conclusion: Our study showed a significantly increased risk of infections with MDRO in patients with burn who had larger TBSA burns, lower GCS, and higher SOFA and APACHE II scores. Future studies with larger sample size are needed to confirm our results.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.