多发性硬化症患者神经系统患者综合姑息预后量表(IPOS-Neuro S8)的跨文化验证

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Kim Dillen, Wiebke Müller, Martin Hellmich, Yasemin Goereci, Veronika Dunkl, Anne Dorr, Gereon R Fink, Raymond Voltz, Mevhibe Hocaoglu, Clemens Warnke, Heidrun Golla
{"title":"多发性硬化症患者神经系统患者综合姑息预后量表(IPOS-Neuro S8)的跨文化验证","authors":"Kim Dillen, Wiebke Müller, Martin Hellmich, Yasemin Goereci, Veronika Dunkl, Anne Dorr, Gereon R Fink, Raymond Voltz, Mevhibe Hocaoglu, Clemens Warnke, Heidrun Golla","doi":"10.1017/S1478951525000392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Standardized measures to evaluate neurological patients in palliative care are missing. The Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale, a self-report tailored for neurological patients (IPOS Neuro-S8) helps identify symptom burden but lacks validation in German. This study aimed to validate the IPOS Neuro-S8 in severely affected multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This validation study is a secondary analysis of data from a clinical phase II intervention study with severely affected MS patients. The original study enrolled German-speaking patients aged 18 with severe MS who receive an escalating immunotherapeutic agent and/or exhibit a high level of disability were recruited from the administrative district Cologne (#DRKS00021783). In this validation study, we evaluated construct, discriminant, and convergent validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to change of the IPOS Neuro-S8, using the \"Hamburger Lebensqualitätsmessinstrument\" (HALEMS), and the Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation supplemented by neurological symptoms (HOPE+) as comparison measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 80 MS patients (mean age 56, SD = 11) were analyzed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a 3-factor structure (<i>r</i> = 0.34-0.63), reflecting distinct clinical patterns, i.e., <i>breath-mouth connection, pain-sleep cycle</i>, and <i>nausea-vomiting link</i>. Significant convergent validity to hypothesized total score of the HOPE+ (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i>(78) = 0.71, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and good discriminant validity using the HALEMS total score (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i>(78) = 0.48, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were observed. Correlation with physical symptoms of the HALEMS was stronger than with nonphysical aspects. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.67) and test-retest reliability (intraclass coefficient = 0.75) were acceptable.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>IPOS Neuro-S8 displays promising psychometric properties for assessing palliative care symptoms in severe MS, a model for other severe neurological diseases due to MS's broad central nervous involvement, allowing findings to be transferable to other neurological diseases. A criterion for minimal clinically important difference was established to evaluate the sensitivity to change. Additional validation across different neurological conditions and disease severities is warranted to enhance generalizability and clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-cultural validation of the integrated palliative outcome scale for neurological patients (IPOS-Neuro S8) in multiple sclerosis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Kim Dillen, Wiebke Müller, Martin Hellmich, Yasemin Goereci, Veronika Dunkl, Anne Dorr, Gereon R Fink, Raymond Voltz, Mevhibe Hocaoglu, Clemens Warnke, Heidrun Golla\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1478951525000392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Standardized measures to evaluate neurological patients in palliative care are missing. The Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale, a self-report tailored for neurological patients (IPOS Neuro-S8) helps identify symptom burden but lacks validation in German. This study aimed to validate the IPOS Neuro-S8 in severely affected multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This validation study is a secondary analysis of data from a clinical phase II intervention study with severely affected MS patients. The original study enrolled German-speaking patients aged 18 with severe MS who receive an escalating immunotherapeutic agent and/or exhibit a high level of disability were recruited from the administrative district Cologne (#DRKS00021783). In this validation study, we evaluated construct, discriminant, and convergent validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to change of the IPOS Neuro-S8, using the \\\"Hamburger Lebensqualitätsmessinstrument\\\" (HALEMS), and the Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation supplemented by neurological symptoms (HOPE+) as comparison measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 80 MS patients (mean age 56, SD = 11) were analyzed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a 3-factor structure (<i>r</i> = 0.34-0.63), reflecting distinct clinical patterns, i.e., <i>breath-mouth connection, pain-sleep cycle</i>, and <i>nausea-vomiting link</i>. Significant convergent validity to hypothesized total score of the HOPE+ (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i>(78) = 0.71, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and good discriminant validity using the HALEMS total score (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i>(78) = 0.48, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were observed. Correlation with physical symptoms of the HALEMS was stronger than with nonphysical aspects. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.67) and test-retest reliability (intraclass coefficient = 0.75) were acceptable.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>IPOS Neuro-S8 displays promising psychometric properties for assessing palliative care symptoms in severe MS, a model for other severe neurological diseases due to MS's broad central nervous involvement, allowing findings to be transferable to other neurological diseases. A criterion for minimal clinically important difference was established to evaluate the sensitivity to change. Additional validation across different neurological conditions and disease severities is warranted to enhance generalizability and clinical utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"e110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951525000392\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951525000392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前缺乏评估姑息治疗中神经系统患者的标准化措施。综合姑息预后量表是一种为神经系统患者量身定制的自我报告(IPOS neuros8),有助于识别症状负担,但在德国缺乏验证。本研究旨在验证IPOS神经- s8在严重影响多发性硬化症(MS)患者中的应用。方法:该验证研究是对一项严重影响MS患者的临床II期干预研究数据的二次分析。最初的研究招募了来自科隆行政区(#DRKS00021783)的18岁德语重症MS患者,这些患者接受了不断升级的免疫治疗剂和/或表现出高度残疾。在本验证研究中,我们评估IPOS neuros8的结构效度、判别效度和收敛效度、内部一致性、重测信度和对变化的敏感性,采用“汉堡Lebensqualitätsmessinstrument”(HALEMS)和辅以神经症状的临终关怀和姑息治疗评估(HOPE+)作为比较措施。结果:对80例MS患者的资料进行分析,平均年龄56岁,SD = 11。探索性和验证性因素分析显示存在3因素结构(r = 0.34-0.63),反映了不同的临床模式,即呼吸-口连接、疼痛-睡眠周期和恶心-呕吐连接。HOPE+的假设总分具有显著的收敛效度(rs(78) = 0.71, p < 0.001),使用HALEMS总分具有良好的判别效度(rs(78) = 0.48, p < 0.001)。HALEMS与身体症状的相关性强于与非身体症状的相关性。内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.67)和重测信度(类内系数= 0.75)可接受。结果的意义:IPOS neuros8在评估严重多发性硬化症的姑息治疗症状方面显示出有希望的心理测量特性,这是由于多发性硬化症广泛累及中枢神经而导致的其他严重神经系统疾病的模型,使研究结果可转移到其他神经系统疾病。建立了最小临床重要差异的标准来评估对变化的敏感性。对不同神经系统状况和疾病严重程度的额外验证是必要的,以提高普遍性和临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-cultural validation of the integrated palliative outcome scale for neurological patients (IPOS-Neuro S8) in multiple sclerosis patients.

Objectives: Standardized measures to evaluate neurological patients in palliative care are missing. The Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale, a self-report tailored for neurological patients (IPOS Neuro-S8) helps identify symptom burden but lacks validation in German. This study aimed to validate the IPOS Neuro-S8 in severely affected multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

Methods: This validation study is a secondary analysis of data from a clinical phase II intervention study with severely affected MS patients. The original study enrolled German-speaking patients aged 18 with severe MS who receive an escalating immunotherapeutic agent and/or exhibit a high level of disability were recruited from the administrative district Cologne (#DRKS00021783). In this validation study, we evaluated construct, discriminant, and convergent validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to change of the IPOS Neuro-S8, using the "Hamburger Lebensqualitätsmessinstrument" (HALEMS), and the Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation supplemented by neurological symptoms (HOPE+) as comparison measures.

Results: Data from 80 MS patients (mean age 56, SD = 11) were analyzed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a 3-factor structure (r = 0.34-0.63), reflecting distinct clinical patterns, i.e., breath-mouth connection, pain-sleep cycle, and nausea-vomiting link. Significant convergent validity to hypothesized total score of the HOPE+ (rs(78) = 0.71, p < 0.001) and good discriminant validity using the HALEMS total score (rs(78) = 0.48, p < 0.001) were observed. Correlation with physical symptoms of the HALEMS was stronger than with nonphysical aspects. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.67) and test-retest reliability (intraclass coefficient = 0.75) were acceptable.

Significance of results: IPOS Neuro-S8 displays promising psychometric properties for assessing palliative care symptoms in severe MS, a model for other severe neurological diseases due to MS's broad central nervous involvement, allowing findings to be transferable to other neurological diseases. A criterion for minimal clinically important difference was established to evaluate the sensitivity to change. Additional validation across different neurological conditions and disease severities is warranted to enhance generalizability and clinical utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信