衔接生物科学与实践:临床模拟训练对护生新手的意义。

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S482384
Heidi Kristine Grønlien, Astrid Wevling, Marian Bringa Arntsen, Erna Haug
{"title":"衔接生物科学与实践:临床模拟训练对护生新手的意义。","authors":"Heidi Kristine Grønlien, Astrid Wevling, Marian Bringa Arntsen, Erna Haug","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S482384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate clinical simulation as a learning method to enhance the relevance of bioscience in nursing practice for novice nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilizes a semi-experimental multi-method design involving 194 novice bachelor nursing students at a Norwegian university college, marking the program's inaugural simulation training. The students were divided into Group 1 and Group 2. Both groups underwent simulation-based training, but Group 2 received an additional extended debriefing where a bioscience specialist linked patient observations with physiological processes. Data collection occurred in two phases: quantitative data were collected on simulation day through a questionnaire and structured observation, and qualitative data from two reflection questions, supplemented with quantitative data from a questionnaire, were collected one week later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed that students' emotional states are highly activated during simulation training. Despite this, the students reported that their overall simulation experience was positive. A deficiency in the use of bioscience terminology was identified during debriefing to explain observations, assessments, and actions. The students' reflections on the benefits from simulation training showed that it provides them with practical experience in visualizing real-world scenarios, fostering readiness for action as a nurse, and metacognition of their learning process. Moreover, the findings indicated that students in Group 2 (extended debriefing) were more inclined to incorporate bioscience terminology in their reflective responses, particularly considering the impact of bioscience knowledge on nursing practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical simulation training provides novice nursing students with clinical experience and an opportunity to connect bioscience with practice. Although the students insufficiently used bioscientific concepts during debriefing, they evaluated the relevance of bioscience in practice highly. Our findings carry significant implications for structuring simulation training, emphasizing the necessity of specialists in both debriefing techniques and bioscience to bridge the gap between theory and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"927-941"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Bioscience to Practice: The Significance of Clinical Simulation Training for Novice Nursing Students.\",\"authors\":\"Heidi Kristine Grønlien, Astrid Wevling, Marian Bringa Arntsen, Erna Haug\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/AMEP.S482384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate clinical simulation as a learning method to enhance the relevance of bioscience in nursing practice for novice nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilizes a semi-experimental multi-method design involving 194 novice bachelor nursing students at a Norwegian university college, marking the program's inaugural simulation training. The students were divided into Group 1 and Group 2. Both groups underwent simulation-based training, but Group 2 received an additional extended debriefing where a bioscience specialist linked patient observations with physiological processes. Data collection occurred in two phases: quantitative data were collected on simulation day through a questionnaire and structured observation, and qualitative data from two reflection questions, supplemented with quantitative data from a questionnaire, were collected one week later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed that students' emotional states are highly activated during simulation training. Despite this, the students reported that their overall simulation experience was positive. A deficiency in the use of bioscience terminology was identified during debriefing to explain observations, assessments, and actions. The students' reflections on the benefits from simulation training showed that it provides them with practical experience in visualizing real-world scenarios, fostering readiness for action as a nurse, and metacognition of their learning process. Moreover, the findings indicated that students in Group 2 (extended debriefing) were more inclined to incorporate bioscience terminology in their reflective responses, particularly considering the impact of bioscience knowledge on nursing practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical simulation training provides novice nursing students with clinical experience and an opportunity to connect bioscience with practice. Although the students insufficiently used bioscientific concepts during debriefing, they evaluated the relevance of bioscience in practice highly. Our findings carry significant implications for structuring simulation training, emphasizing the necessity of specialists in both debriefing techniques and bioscience to bridge the gap between theory and practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"927-941\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129088/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S482384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S482384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨临床模拟作为一种学习方法,以提高新生护理实践中生物科学的相关性。方法:本研究采用半实验多方法设计,涉及挪威一所大学学院的194名护理本科新生,这是该项目首次进行模拟训练。学生们被分为第一组和第二组。两组都进行了模拟训练,但第二组接受了额外的扩展汇报,由生物科学专家将患者观察结果与生理过程联系起来。数据收集分为两个阶段:模拟日通过问卷调查和结构化观察收集定量数据,一周后通过两个反思题收集定性数据,并辅以问卷调查的定量数据。结果:在模拟训练中,学生情绪状态被高度激活。尽管如此,学生们报告说他们的整体模拟体验是积极的。在解释观察、评估和行动的汇报过程中,发现了使用生物科学术语的缺陷。学生们对模拟训练的好处的反思表明,模拟训练为他们提供了可视化现实世界场景的实践经验,培养了作为护士的行动准备,以及对学习过程的元认知。此外,研究结果表明,第二组(扩展汇报)的学生更倾向于在他们的反思回答中纳入生物科学术语,特别是考虑到生物科学知识对护理实践的影响。结论:临床模拟训练为护生新手提供了临床经验和生物科学与实践相结合的机会。虽然学生们在汇报中没有充分使用生物科学概念,但他们高度评价了生物科学在实践中的相关性。我们的研究结果对构建模拟训练具有重要意义,强调了汇报技术和生物科学专家在理论与实践之间架起桥梁的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging Bioscience to Practice: The Significance of Clinical Simulation Training for Novice Nursing Students.

Purpose: This study aims to investigate clinical simulation as a learning method to enhance the relevance of bioscience in nursing practice for novice nursing students.

Methods: This study utilizes a semi-experimental multi-method design involving 194 novice bachelor nursing students at a Norwegian university college, marking the program's inaugural simulation training. The students were divided into Group 1 and Group 2. Both groups underwent simulation-based training, but Group 2 received an additional extended debriefing where a bioscience specialist linked patient observations with physiological processes. Data collection occurred in two phases: quantitative data were collected on simulation day through a questionnaire and structured observation, and qualitative data from two reflection questions, supplemented with quantitative data from a questionnaire, were collected one week later.

Results: The findings revealed that students' emotional states are highly activated during simulation training. Despite this, the students reported that their overall simulation experience was positive. A deficiency in the use of bioscience terminology was identified during debriefing to explain observations, assessments, and actions. The students' reflections on the benefits from simulation training showed that it provides them with practical experience in visualizing real-world scenarios, fostering readiness for action as a nurse, and metacognition of their learning process. Moreover, the findings indicated that students in Group 2 (extended debriefing) were more inclined to incorporate bioscience terminology in their reflective responses, particularly considering the impact of bioscience knowledge on nursing practice.

Conclusion: Clinical simulation training provides novice nursing students with clinical experience and an opportunity to connect bioscience with practice. Although the students insufficiently used bioscientific concepts during debriefing, they evaluated the relevance of bioscience in practice highly. Our findings carry significant implications for structuring simulation training, emphasizing the necessity of specialists in both debriefing techniques and bioscience to bridge the gap between theory and practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信