Kerwyn Jim C Chan, Jeriel R De Silos, Madelyn A Gabrieles, Michael Justin S Valles
{"title":"卫生素养干预措施对社区卫生工作者的知识、技能和态度的有效性:一项系统审查方案","authors":"Kerwyn Jim C Chan, Jeriel R De Silos, Madelyn A Gabrieles, Michael Justin S Valles","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of health literacy interventions compared to standard or usual educational practices on the knowledge, skills, and attitudes in community health workers.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health literacy plays a crucial role in improving personal and societal health outcomes. Community health workers, who serve as cultural mediators and health educators in communities, often face gaps in formal training on health literacy. Addressing this need through evidence-based interventions is essential to enhance their competencies and support their critical roles in health care systems worldwide.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The review will consider experimental and quasi-experimental studies, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies. Studies evaluating health literacy interventions, such as training, workshops, or seminars, delivered through any modality and language will be included. Primary outcomes include community health workers' health literacy knowledge assessed through validated measures. Secondary outcomes include skills in obtaining and processing health information and health literacy attitudes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL will be searched, along with gray literature sources such as ClinicalTrials.gov. Screening of reports and assessment of methodological quality will be done by at least 2 independent reviewers. Data synthesis will involve meta-analysis, where appropriate, with subgroup analyses based on socioeconomic status, intervention duration, and delivery modality. Alternative synthesis methods will be used if statistical pooling is not possible. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be used to assess the certainty of findings.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO ID CRD42025639226.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the knowledge, skills, and attitudes in community health workers: a systematic review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Kerwyn Jim C Chan, Jeriel R De Silos, Madelyn A Gabrieles, Michael Justin S Valles\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-25-00035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of health literacy interventions compared to standard or usual educational practices on the knowledge, skills, and attitudes in community health workers.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health literacy plays a crucial role in improving personal and societal health outcomes. Community health workers, who serve as cultural mediators and health educators in communities, often face gaps in formal training on health literacy. Addressing this need through evidence-based interventions is essential to enhance their competencies and support their critical roles in health care systems worldwide.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The review will consider experimental and quasi-experimental studies, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies. Studies evaluating health literacy interventions, such as training, workshops, or seminars, delivered through any modality and language will be included. Primary outcomes include community health workers' health literacy knowledge assessed through validated measures. Secondary outcomes include skills in obtaining and processing health information and health literacy attitudes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL will be searched, along with gray literature sources such as ClinicalTrials.gov. Screening of reports and assessment of methodological quality will be done by at least 2 independent reviewers. Data synthesis will involve meta-analysis, where appropriate, with subgroup analyses based on socioeconomic status, intervention duration, and delivery modality. Alternative synthesis methods will be used if statistical pooling is not possible. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be used to assess the certainty of findings.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO ID CRD42025639226.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-25-00035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-25-00035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本系统综述旨在评估卫生素养干预措施的有效性,与标准或通常的教育实践相比,社区卫生工作者的知识、技能和态度。健康素养在改善个人和社会健康结果方面发挥着至关重要的作用。社区卫生工作者在社区中充当文化调解人和卫生教育工作者,但在卫生素养的正式培训方面往往存在差距。通过循证干预措施满足这一需求,对于提高他们的能力并支持他们在全球卫生保健系统中发挥关键作用至关重要。纳入标准:本综述将考虑实验和准实验研究,包括随机对照试验、队列研究和横断面研究。将包括评估卫生素养干预措施的研究,如通过任何形式和语言提供的培训、讲习班或研讨会。主要成果包括通过有效措施评估社区卫生工作者的卫生素养知识。次要结果包括获取和处理卫生信息的技能以及卫生素养态度。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和CINAHL等数据库,以及ClinicalTrials.gov等灰色文献来源。报告的筛选和方法学质量的评估将由至少2名独立审稿人完成。数据综合将包括元分析,在适当的情况下,根据社会经济地位、干预持续时间和交付方式进行亚组分析。如果统计池是不可能的,将使用替代的综合方法。建议分级评估、发展和评价(GRADE)方法将用于评估结果的确定性。审核注册:PROSPERO ID CRD42025639226。
Effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the knowledge, skills, and attitudes in community health workers: a systematic review protocol.
Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of health literacy interventions compared to standard or usual educational practices on the knowledge, skills, and attitudes in community health workers.
Introduction: Health literacy plays a crucial role in improving personal and societal health outcomes. Community health workers, who serve as cultural mediators and health educators in communities, often face gaps in formal training on health literacy. Addressing this need through evidence-based interventions is essential to enhance their competencies and support their critical roles in health care systems worldwide.
Inclusion criteria: The review will consider experimental and quasi-experimental studies, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies. Studies evaluating health literacy interventions, such as training, workshops, or seminars, delivered through any modality and language will be included. Primary outcomes include community health workers' health literacy knowledge assessed through validated measures. Secondary outcomes include skills in obtaining and processing health information and health literacy attitudes.
Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL will be searched, along with gray literature sources such as ClinicalTrials.gov. Screening of reports and assessment of methodological quality will be done by at least 2 independent reviewers. Data synthesis will involve meta-analysis, where appropriate, with subgroup analyses based on socioeconomic status, intervention duration, and delivery modality. Alternative synthesis methods will be used if statistical pooling is not possible. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be used to assess the certainty of findings.