靶向干预对放射科医生推荐额外成像的累积效应。

IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1148/radiol.243750
Nooshin Abbasi, Neena Kapoor, Ronilda Lacson, Jeffrey P Guenette, Sonali Desai, David Lucier, Sanjay Saini, Rachel Sisodia, Ali S Raja, David W Bates, Ramin Khorasani
{"title":"靶向干预对放射科医生推荐额外成像的累积效应。","authors":"Nooshin Abbasi, Neena Kapoor, Ronilda Lacson, Jeffrey P Guenette, Sonali Desai, David Lucier, Sanjay Saini, Rachel Sisodia, Ali S Raja, David W Bates, Ramin Khorasani","doi":"10.1148/radiol.243750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Ambiguous or unnecessary radiologist recommendations for additional imaging (RAIs) can lead to excessive imaging use and diagnostic errors. Purpose To determine the cumulative impacts of multifaceted technology-enabled interventions aimed at optimizing RAI on RAI rate, actionability, and resolution over an 8-year period. Materials and Methods In this retrospective cohort study, conducted from January 2015 to December 2022, radiology reports from two tertiary hospitals (study site and control site) were analyzed. A series of quality improvement interventions, including radiologist education, electronic communication tools for tracking RAIs, and performance reports, were implemented at the study site but not at the control site. The RAI rate trend over time was compared between the sites using linear regression. Mixed-effects logistic regression was performed to assess the intervention impact on the RAI rate. RAI actionability and resolution were compared between the sites using the Fisher exact test. <i>P</i> values were corrected using the Bonferroni method. Results Among 7 502 521 total radiology reports (1 323 459 patients) (study site, 3 608 977 reports and 660 051 patients; control site, 3 893 544 reports and 690 115 patients), the RAI rate of the study site decreased by 44%, from 10% (8202 of 81 586) to 5.6% (8972 of 159 599), but remained unchanged at the control site, at 10.9% (8757 of 80 030) vs 11% (16 978 of 153 711) (regression coefficient, -0.09; 95% CI: -0.1, -0.09; <i>P</i> < .001). RAI rates declined with each successive intervention at the study site (<i>P</i> < .001), with regression coefficients decreasing progressively from -0.12 (95% CI: -0.14, -0.10) for the initial intervention to -0.81 (95% CI: -0.83, -0.78) for the final intervention. Recommendation actionability at the study site increased 7.6-fold (from 5.6% [19 of 340] to 42.3% [144 of 340]; <i>P</i> < .001) but remained unchanged at the control site (from 15.0% [51 of 340] to 13.8% [47 of 340]; <i>P</i> = .73). Actionable RAIs were more frequently resolved at the study site than at the control site (84.7% [122 of 144] vs 59.6% [28 of 47]; <i>P</i> < .001). Conclusion Multifaceted interventions to optimize RAI improved the rate, actionability, and resolution of RAI. © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Russell in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"315 3","pages":"e243750"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cumulative Effect of Targeted Interventions on Radiologist Recommendations for Additional Imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Nooshin Abbasi, Neena Kapoor, Ronilda Lacson, Jeffrey P Guenette, Sonali Desai, David Lucier, Sanjay Saini, Rachel Sisodia, Ali S Raja, David W Bates, Ramin Khorasani\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/radiol.243750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Ambiguous or unnecessary radiologist recommendations for additional imaging (RAIs) can lead to excessive imaging use and diagnostic errors. Purpose To determine the cumulative impacts of multifaceted technology-enabled interventions aimed at optimizing RAI on RAI rate, actionability, and resolution over an 8-year period. Materials and Methods In this retrospective cohort study, conducted from January 2015 to December 2022, radiology reports from two tertiary hospitals (study site and control site) were analyzed. A series of quality improvement interventions, including radiologist education, electronic communication tools for tracking RAIs, and performance reports, were implemented at the study site but not at the control site. The RAI rate trend over time was compared between the sites using linear regression. Mixed-effects logistic regression was performed to assess the intervention impact on the RAI rate. RAI actionability and resolution were compared between the sites using the Fisher exact test. <i>P</i> values were corrected using the Bonferroni method. Results Among 7 502 521 total radiology reports (1 323 459 patients) (study site, 3 608 977 reports and 660 051 patients; control site, 3 893 544 reports and 690 115 patients), the RAI rate of the study site decreased by 44%, from 10% (8202 of 81 586) to 5.6% (8972 of 159 599), but remained unchanged at the control site, at 10.9% (8757 of 80 030) vs 11% (16 978 of 153 711) (regression coefficient, -0.09; 95% CI: -0.1, -0.09; <i>P</i> < .001). RAI rates declined with each successive intervention at the study site (<i>P</i> < .001), with regression coefficients decreasing progressively from -0.12 (95% CI: -0.14, -0.10) for the initial intervention to -0.81 (95% CI: -0.83, -0.78) for the final intervention. Recommendation actionability at the study site increased 7.6-fold (from 5.6% [19 of 340] to 42.3% [144 of 340]; <i>P</i> < .001) but remained unchanged at the control site (from 15.0% [51 of 340] to 13.8% [47 of 340]; <i>P</i> = .73). Actionable RAIs were more frequently resolved at the study site than at the control site (84.7% [122 of 144] vs 59.6% [28 of 47]; <i>P</i> < .001). Conclusion Multifaceted interventions to optimize RAI improved the rate, actionability, and resolution of RAI. © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Russell in this issue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology\",\"volume\":\"315 3\",\"pages\":\"e243750\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.243750\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.243750","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:放射科医生对附加成像(RAIs)的模糊或不必要的建议可导致过度的成像使用和诊断错误。目的确定旨在优化RAI的多方面技术干预措施在8年期间对RAI率、可操作性和解决方案的累积影响。材料与方法本回顾性队列研究于2015年1月至2022年12月进行,对两家三级医院(研究点和对照点)的放射学报告进行分析。一系列质量改进干预措施,包括放射科医生教育、追踪rai的电子通信工具和绩效报告,在研究地点实施,而不是在对照地点。利用线性回归比较了各站点间RAI率随时间的变化趋势。采用混合效应logistic回归评估干预对RAI率的影响。采用Fisher精确检验比较不同地点间RAI的可操作性和分辨率。使用Bonferroni方法校正P值。结果在7 502 521份总放射学报告中(1 323 459例患者)(研究地点,3 608 977份报告,660 051例患者;对照区(3 893 544例报告,690 115例患者),研究区RAI率下降44%,从10%(81 586例中8202例)降至5.6%(159 599例中8972例),但在对照区保持不变,分别为10.9%(80 030例中8757例)和11%(153 711例中16 978例)(回归系数为-0.09;95% ci: -0.1, -0.09;P < 0.001)。RAI率随着研究地点的每次连续干预而下降(P < 0.001),回归系数从初始干预的-0.12 (95% CI: -0.14, -0.10)逐渐下降到最终干预的-0.81 (95% CI: -0.83, -0.78)。研究现场的建议可操作性增加了7.6倍(从5.6%[340人中的19人]增加到42.3%[340人中的144人];P < 0.001),但在对照部位保持不变(从15.0%[340人中的51人]到13.8%[340人中的47人];P = .73)。可操作的rai在研究地点比在对照地点得到解决的频率更高(84.7% [144 / 122]vs 59.6% [47 / 28];P < 0.001)。结论多种干预措施优化RAI可提高RAI的发生率、可操作性和治愈率。©RSNA, 2025本文可获得补充材料。参见Russell在本期的社论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cumulative Effect of Targeted Interventions on Radiologist Recommendations for Additional Imaging.

Background Ambiguous or unnecessary radiologist recommendations for additional imaging (RAIs) can lead to excessive imaging use and diagnostic errors. Purpose To determine the cumulative impacts of multifaceted technology-enabled interventions aimed at optimizing RAI on RAI rate, actionability, and resolution over an 8-year period. Materials and Methods In this retrospective cohort study, conducted from January 2015 to December 2022, radiology reports from two tertiary hospitals (study site and control site) were analyzed. A series of quality improvement interventions, including radiologist education, electronic communication tools for tracking RAIs, and performance reports, were implemented at the study site but not at the control site. The RAI rate trend over time was compared between the sites using linear regression. Mixed-effects logistic regression was performed to assess the intervention impact on the RAI rate. RAI actionability and resolution were compared between the sites using the Fisher exact test. P values were corrected using the Bonferroni method. Results Among 7 502 521 total radiology reports (1 323 459 patients) (study site, 3 608 977 reports and 660 051 patients; control site, 3 893 544 reports and 690 115 patients), the RAI rate of the study site decreased by 44%, from 10% (8202 of 81 586) to 5.6% (8972 of 159 599), but remained unchanged at the control site, at 10.9% (8757 of 80 030) vs 11% (16 978 of 153 711) (regression coefficient, -0.09; 95% CI: -0.1, -0.09; P < .001). RAI rates declined with each successive intervention at the study site (P < .001), with regression coefficients decreasing progressively from -0.12 (95% CI: -0.14, -0.10) for the initial intervention to -0.81 (95% CI: -0.83, -0.78) for the final intervention. Recommendation actionability at the study site increased 7.6-fold (from 5.6% [19 of 340] to 42.3% [144 of 340]; P < .001) but remained unchanged at the control site (from 15.0% [51 of 340] to 13.8% [47 of 340]; P = .73). Actionable RAIs were more frequently resolved at the study site than at the control site (84.7% [122 of 144] vs 59.6% [28 of 47]; P < .001). Conclusion Multifaceted interventions to optimize RAI improved the rate, actionability, and resolution of RAI. © RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Russell in this issue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology
Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
35.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
596
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies. Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信