肌肉减少症对肉瘤患者的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Domenico Albano, Moreno Zanardo, Mariachiara Basile, Nicole Alessandra De Micheli, Alessandro Berenghi, Francesca Serpi, Salvatore Gitto, Carmelo Messina, Luca Maria Sconfienza
{"title":"肌肉减少症对肉瘤患者的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Domenico Albano, Moreno Zanardo, Mariachiara Basile, Nicole Alessandra De Micheli, Alessandro Berenghi, Francesca Serpi, Salvatore Gitto, Carmelo Messina, Luca Maria Sconfienza","doi":"10.1007/s11547-025-02016-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sarcopenia has been linked to poor outcomes in various cancers, but its specific effect on sarcoma patients remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the impact of sarcopenia, estimated using CT, on sarcoma patients, focusing on prognostic implications and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS databases were searched up to March 2025. Then, a meta-analysis of the data was performed. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were the endpoints. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were assessed to evaluate the association between sarcopenia and survival of sarcoma patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies with a total of 1699 patients met the inclusion criteria. Liposarcoma was the most reported histotype in 67% of the studies, with extremities being the most common tumor location (50%), and chemotherapy was the primary intervention in 89% of cases, followed by radiation therapy (78%) and surgery (67%). Analyzing seven articles, a pooled HR of 1.91 (95% CI 1.09-3.34) for OS was reached, indicating that sarcopenic patients have a 91% higher risk of mortality compared to non-sarcopenic patients (p < 0.01). There is no evidence of selective publication (p = 0.137). The meta-analysis for the two studies that reported HR of RFS resulted 1.16 (95% CI 0.85-1.59), not significant (p = 0.28). The quality of the included studies demonstrated high methodological rigor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Worse outcomes have been observed in sarcopenic patients with sarcomas, but the impact of sarcopenia on OS and RFS still remains uncertain, highlighting the need for further research and standardized approaches. Trial Registration The protocol for this review has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (registration unique identifying number: CRD42024578969).</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of sarcopenia on sarcoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Domenico Albano, Moreno Zanardo, Mariachiara Basile, Nicole Alessandra De Micheli, Alessandro Berenghi, Francesca Serpi, Salvatore Gitto, Carmelo Messina, Luca Maria Sconfienza\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11547-025-02016-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sarcopenia has been linked to poor outcomes in various cancers, but its specific effect on sarcoma patients remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the impact of sarcopenia, estimated using CT, on sarcoma patients, focusing on prognostic implications and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS databases were searched up to March 2025. Then, a meta-analysis of the data was performed. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were the endpoints. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were assessed to evaluate the association between sarcopenia and survival of sarcoma patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies with a total of 1699 patients met the inclusion criteria. Liposarcoma was the most reported histotype in 67% of the studies, with extremities being the most common tumor location (50%), and chemotherapy was the primary intervention in 89% of cases, followed by radiation therapy (78%) and surgery (67%). Analyzing seven articles, a pooled HR of 1.91 (95% CI 1.09-3.34) for OS was reached, indicating that sarcopenic patients have a 91% higher risk of mortality compared to non-sarcopenic patients (p < 0.01). There is no evidence of selective publication (p = 0.137). The meta-analysis for the two studies that reported HR of RFS resulted 1.16 (95% CI 0.85-1.59), not significant (p = 0.28). The quality of the included studies demonstrated high methodological rigor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Worse outcomes have been observed in sarcopenic patients with sarcomas, but the impact of sarcopenia on OS and RFS still remains uncertain, highlighting the need for further research and standardized approaches. Trial Registration The protocol for this review has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (registration unique identifying number: CRD42024578969).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-02016-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-02016-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:骨骼肌减少症与各种癌症的不良预后有关,但其对肉瘤患者的具体影响尚不清楚。本系统综述和荟萃分析调查了用CT估计的肌少症对肉瘤患者的影响,重点关注预后和相关结果。材料和方法:检索截至2025年3月的PubMed、Embase和SCOPUS数据库。然后,对数据进行meta分析。终点为总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。评估风险比和95%置信区间,以评估肌肉减少症与肉瘤患者生存之间的关系。结果:18项研究共1699例患者符合纳入标准。在67%的研究中,脂肪肉瘤是报告最多的组织类型,四肢是最常见的肿瘤部位(50%),化疗是89%病例的主要干预措施,其次是放射治疗(78%)和手术(67%)。通过对7篇文献的分析,OS的总HR为1.91 (95% CI 1.09-3.34),表明肌少症患者的死亡风险比非肌少症患者高91% (p结论:肌少症合并肉瘤患者的预后更差,但肌少症对OS和RFS的影响仍不确定,需要进一步研究和标准化方法。本综述的方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO)数据库中注册(注册唯一识别码:CRD42024578969)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of sarcopenia on sarcoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: Sarcopenia has been linked to poor outcomes in various cancers, but its specific effect on sarcoma patients remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the impact of sarcopenia, estimated using CT, on sarcoma patients, focusing on prognostic implications and associated outcomes.

Materials and methods: The PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS databases were searched up to March 2025. Then, a meta-analysis of the data was performed. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were the endpoints. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were assessed to evaluate the association between sarcopenia and survival of sarcoma patients.

Results: Eighteen studies with a total of 1699 patients met the inclusion criteria. Liposarcoma was the most reported histotype in 67% of the studies, with extremities being the most common tumor location (50%), and chemotherapy was the primary intervention in 89% of cases, followed by radiation therapy (78%) and surgery (67%). Analyzing seven articles, a pooled HR of 1.91 (95% CI 1.09-3.34) for OS was reached, indicating that sarcopenic patients have a 91% higher risk of mortality compared to non-sarcopenic patients (p < 0.01). There is no evidence of selective publication (p = 0.137). The meta-analysis for the two studies that reported HR of RFS resulted 1.16 (95% CI 0.85-1.59), not significant (p = 0.28). The quality of the included studies demonstrated high methodological rigor.

Conclusions: Worse outcomes have been observed in sarcopenic patients with sarcomas, but the impact of sarcopenia on OS and RFS still remains uncertain, highlighting the need for further research and standardized approaches. Trial Registration The protocol for this review has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (registration unique identifying number: CRD42024578969).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologia Medica
Radiologia Medica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信