口腔黏膜病变临床诊断算法的现状:范围综述。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Oral diseases Pub Date : 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1111/odi.15388
Mohammed Al-Shehri, Theerthika Dillibabu, Belinda Nicolau, Marco Magalhaes, Nicholas Makhoul, Faleh Tamimi, Peter Chauvin, Sreenath Madathil
{"title":"口腔黏膜病变临床诊断算法的现状:范围综述。","authors":"Mohammed Al-Shehri, Theerthika Dillibabu, Belinda Nicolau, Marco Magalhaes, Nicholas Makhoul, Faleh Tamimi, Peter Chauvin, Sreenath Madathil","doi":"10.1111/odi.15388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing oral lesions remains challenging for many dentists. Despite the availability of diagnostic algorithms, there is a dearth of comprehensive evidence synthesis and a discussion on their clinical and pedagogical applicability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted to identify: (1) algorithms or flow diagrams that help clinicians to diagnose oral lesions in a clinical setting without additional software; (2) publications in English; (3) all age groups; (4) algorithms for oral lesions of soft tissue only. We excluded those that are: (1) black-box; (2) required additional tests; (3) older versions; (4) for non-mucosal lesions, and (5) intended for self-screening. A keyword and MeSH term search was performed across three peer-reviewed publication databases and gray literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen algorithms from 15 peer-reviewed manuscripts and 1 online course were identified. Most studies did not mention how the algorithms were developed, and none had been validated in a clinical setting. The algorithms often focused on one or two types of lesions and were incomplete in differential diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Few clinical diagnostic algorithms for oral lesions are available in the literature. Notably, there are no validated and comprehensive clinical diagnostic algorithms for oral mucosal lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19615,"journal":{"name":"Oral diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Current State of Clinical Diagnostic Algorithms for Mucosal Oral Lesions: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Al-Shehri, Theerthika Dillibabu, Belinda Nicolau, Marco Magalhaes, Nicholas Makhoul, Faleh Tamimi, Peter Chauvin, Sreenath Madathil\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/odi.15388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing oral lesions remains challenging for many dentists. Despite the availability of diagnostic algorithms, there is a dearth of comprehensive evidence synthesis and a discussion on their clinical and pedagogical applicability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted to identify: (1) algorithms or flow diagrams that help clinicians to diagnose oral lesions in a clinical setting without additional software; (2) publications in English; (3) all age groups; (4) algorithms for oral lesions of soft tissue only. We excluded those that are: (1) black-box; (2) required additional tests; (3) older versions; (4) for non-mucosal lesions, and (5) intended for self-screening. A keyword and MeSH term search was performed across three peer-reviewed publication databases and gray literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen algorithms from 15 peer-reviewed manuscripts and 1 online course were identified. Most studies did not mention how the algorithms were developed, and none had been validated in a clinical setting. The algorithms often focused on one or two types of lesions and were incomplete in differential diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Few clinical diagnostic algorithms for oral lesions are available in the literature. Notably, there are no validated and comprehensive clinical diagnostic algorithms for oral mucosal lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.15388\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.15388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对许多牙医来说,诊断口腔病变仍然是一个挑战。尽管诊断算法的可用性,但缺乏全面的证据合成和对其临床和教学适用性的讨论。方法:进行了范围审查,以确定:(1)算法或流程图,帮助临床医生在临床环境中诊断口腔病变,而无需额外的软件;(二)英文出版物;(3)各年龄组;(4)仅针对口腔软组织病变的算法。我们排除了那些:(1)黑箱;(2)需要进行的附加试验;(3)旧版本;(4)用于非粘膜病变,(5)用于自我筛查。在三个同行评审的出版物数据库和灰色文献中进行了关键词和MeSH术语搜索。结果:从15篇同行评议稿件和1门在线课程中确定了17种算法。大多数研究没有提到算法是如何开发的,也没有一项研究在临床环境中得到验证。算法往往集中在一种或两种类型的病变,在鉴别诊断是不完整的。结论:文献中口腔病变的临床诊断算法很少。值得注意的是,目前还没有经过验证的、全面的口腔黏膜病变临床诊断算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Current State of Clinical Diagnostic Algorithms for Mucosal Oral Lesions: A Scoping Review.

Background: Diagnosing oral lesions remains challenging for many dentists. Despite the availability of diagnostic algorithms, there is a dearth of comprehensive evidence synthesis and a discussion on their clinical and pedagogical applicability.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted to identify: (1) algorithms or flow diagrams that help clinicians to diagnose oral lesions in a clinical setting without additional software; (2) publications in English; (3) all age groups; (4) algorithms for oral lesions of soft tissue only. We excluded those that are: (1) black-box; (2) required additional tests; (3) older versions; (4) for non-mucosal lesions, and (5) intended for self-screening. A keyword and MeSH term search was performed across three peer-reviewed publication databases and gray literature.

Results: Seventeen algorithms from 15 peer-reviewed manuscripts and 1 online course were identified. Most studies did not mention how the algorithms were developed, and none had been validated in a clinical setting. The algorithms often focused on one or two types of lesions and were incomplete in differential diagnoses.

Conclusion: Few clinical diagnostic algorithms for oral lesions are available in the literature. Notably, there are no validated and comprehensive clinical diagnostic algorithms for oral mucosal lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral diseases
Oral diseases 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
325
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Oral Diseases is a multidisciplinary and international journal with a focus on head and neck disorders, edited by leaders in the field, Professor Giovanni Lodi (Editor-in-Chief, Milan, Italy), Professor Stefano Petti (Deputy Editor, Rome, Italy) and Associate Professor Gulshan Sunavala-Dossabhoy (Deputy Editor, Shreveport, LA, USA). The journal is pre-eminent in oral medicine. Oral Diseases specifically strives to link often-isolated areas of dentistry and medicine through broad-based scholarship that includes well-designed and controlled clinical research, analytical epidemiology, and the translation of basic science in pre-clinical studies. The journal typically publishes articles relevant to many related medical specialties including especially dermatology, gastroenterology, hematology, immunology, infectious diseases, neuropsychiatry, oncology and otolaryngology. The essential requirement is that all submitted research is hypothesis-driven, with significant positive and negative results both welcomed. Equal publication emphasis is placed on etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信