M E Heráclio, A J Nascimento, C G Souza E Silva, C P Assis, R Braz, T Correia
{"title":"评价传统胶合剂和自粘胶合剂在玻璃纤维桩胶结中的粘结强度：系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"M E Heráclio, A J Nascimento, C G Souza E Silva, C P Assis, R Braz, T Correia","doi":"10.2341/23-073-LIT","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the bond strength of self-adhesive (no need for bonding procedures) and conventional (with total-etch or self-etch primers) cementation strategies and the qualitative variables that interfere with the adhesion of fiberglass posts through a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) and registered under the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). The research question was \"What resin cement provides better bond strength between the fiberglass posts and the root dentin: conventional or self-adhesive?\" The PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched by two independent researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistically significant differences between self-adhesive and conventional resin cements (p<0.00001), favoring conventional cements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conventional cements presented the best results regarding the bond strength of the fiberglass post cementation. However, variations in methodology and the risk of bias in analyzed studies may have decreased the reliability of the present study. More studies on this subject using a leveled methodology are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":19502,"journal":{"name":"Operative dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Bond Strengths of Conventional and Self-Adhesive Cements in the Cementation of Fiberglass Posts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"M E Heráclio, A J Nascimento, C G Souza E Silva, C P Assis, R Braz, T Correia\",\"doi\":\"10.2341/23-073-LIT\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the bond strength of self-adhesive (no need for bonding procedures) and conventional (with total-etch or self-etch primers) cementation strategies and the qualitative variables that interfere with the adhesion of fiberglass posts through a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) and registered under the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). The research question was \\\"What resin cement provides better bond strength between the fiberglass posts and the root dentin: conventional or self-adhesive?\\\" The PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched by two independent researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistically significant differences between self-adhesive and conventional resin cements (p<0.00001), favoring conventional cements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conventional cements presented the best results regarding the bond strength of the fiberglass post cementation. However, variations in methodology and the risk of bias in analyzed studies may have decreased the reliability of the present study. More studies on this subject using a leveled methodology are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2341/23-073-LIT\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2341/23-073-LIT","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的：通过对体外研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析，评估自粘（不需要粘接程序）和常规（使用全蚀刻或自蚀刻底漆）胶结策略的粘接强度，以及影响玻璃纤维桩粘接的定性变量。方法：本系统评价和荟萃分析按照系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目（PRISMA）的指南进行，并在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册（PROSPERO）注册。研究的问题是：“哪种树脂胶合剂在玻璃纤维桩和牙根本质之间提供更好的粘合强度：传统的还是自粘的？”PubMed/MEDLINE、Web of Science、Scopus和Cochrane数据库由两名独立研究人员检索。结果：自粘树脂粘结剂与常规树脂粘结剂的粘结强度差异有统计学意义(p)。结论：常规树脂粘结剂对玻璃纤维桩的粘结强度最好。然而，方法的变化和分析研究的偏倚风险可能降低了本研究的可靠性。建议使用分级方法对这一主题进行更多的研究。
Evaluation of Bond Strengths of Conventional and Self-Adhesive Cements in the Cementation of Fiberglass Posts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Objective: To evaluate the bond strength of self-adhesive (no need for bonding procedures) and conventional (with total-etch or self-etch primers) cementation strategies and the qualitative variables that interfere with the adhesion of fiberglass posts through a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.
Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) and registered under the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). The research question was "What resin cement provides better bond strength between the fiberglass posts and the root dentin: conventional or self-adhesive?" The PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched by two independent researchers.
Results: There were statistically significant differences between self-adhesive and conventional resin cements (p<0.00001), favoring conventional cements.
Conclusion: Conventional cements presented the best results regarding the bond strength of the fiberglass post cementation. However, variations in methodology and the risk of bias in analyzed studies may have decreased the reliability of the present study. More studies on this subject using a leveled methodology are recommended.
期刊介绍：
Operative Dentistry is a refereed, international journal published bi-monthly and distributed to subscribers in over 50 countries. In 2012, we printed 84 articles (672 pages). Papers were submitted by authors from 45 countries, in the categories of Clinical Research, Laboratory Research, Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations and Invited Papers, as well as Editorials and Abstracts.
One of the strong points of our journal is that our current publication time for accepted manuscripts is 4 to 6 months from the date of submission. Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations have a very quick turnaround time, which allows for very rapid publication of clinical based concepts. We also provide color for those papers that would benefit from its use.
The journal does not accept any advertising but you will find postings for faculty positions. Additionally, the journal also does not rent, sell or otherwise allow its subscriber list to be used by any other entity
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
