内衬材料与无龋和受龋牙本质的剪切结合强度。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Z K Greene, N R Smith, T Gomes, N C Lawson
{"title":"内衬材料与无龋和受龋牙本质的剪切结合强度。","authors":"Z K Greene, N R Smith, T Gomes, N C Lawson","doi":"10.2341/24-112-L","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental liners are used on caries-free dentin to attenuate postoperative sensitivity and caries-affected dentin to promote remineralization and for antibacterial effects. The shear bond strength of liners to caries-affected and caries-free dentin is a significant clinical property in the restoration of teeth with large caries lesions. Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strengths (SBS) of different liners to caries-free and caries-affected dentin.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>SBS specimens were prepared according to ISO 29022:2013(E) (n=10/group). Caries-free dentin specimens were ground to superficial dentin. For caries-affected dentin, grinding to proximity of carious dentin was performed, remaining caries-infected dentin was removed with a polymer bur, and sanding to 320 grit was conducted to achieve a flat surface. 150-micron thick tape was centered over caries-free or caries-affected dentin, and five different liners (new RMGI-based calcium silicate liner [RMGI/CS], Biodentine, Lime-Lite Enhanced, TheraCal LC, Vitrebond Plus) were applied to dentin and leveled with the tape. Specimens were treated with adhesive, cured, and bonded with resin composite using the Ultradent fixture. Specimens were stored in 37°C water for 24 ± 2 hours and debonded at 1 mm/min. SBS was analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey post hoc test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in SBS among materials for both caries-affected and caries-free dentin (p<0.01). Tukey post hoc analysis grouped materials into significantly different groups for caries-free dentin (Lime-Lite Enhanced, Biodentine < TheraCal LC < Vitrebond Plus, RMGI/CS) and caries-affected dentin (Lime-Lite Enhanced, Biodentine, TheraCal LC < Vitrebond Plus, RMGI/CS). There was no difference in SBS to caries-free and caries-affected dentin for Lime-Lite Enhanced (p=0.359), Biodentine (p=0.522), Vitrebond Plus (p=0.406), or RMGI/CS (p=0.165). SBS was significantly greater to caries-free dentin with TheraCal LC (p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RMGI/CS and Vitrebond Plus produced higher SBS to caries-free and caries-affected dentin than the three other materials. There was a higher bond to caries-free dentin than caries-affected dentin for TheraCal LC, but not for any of the other liners tested. Clinicians should balance biologic advantages of liner materials with a decrease in bond strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":19502,"journal":{"name":"Operative dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shear Bond Strength of Liner Materials to Caries-Free and Caries-Affected Dentin.\",\"authors\":\"Z K Greene, N R Smith, T Gomes, N C Lawson\",\"doi\":\"10.2341/24-112-L\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental liners are used on caries-free dentin to attenuate postoperative sensitivity and caries-affected dentin to promote remineralization and for antibacterial effects. The shear bond strength of liners to caries-affected and caries-free dentin is a significant clinical property in the restoration of teeth with large caries lesions. Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strengths (SBS) of different liners to caries-free and caries-affected dentin.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>SBS specimens were prepared according to ISO 29022:2013(E) (n=10/group). Caries-free dentin specimens were ground to superficial dentin. For caries-affected dentin, grinding to proximity of carious dentin was performed, remaining caries-infected dentin was removed with a polymer bur, and sanding to 320 grit was conducted to achieve a flat surface. 150-micron thick tape was centered over caries-free or caries-affected dentin, and five different liners (new RMGI-based calcium silicate liner [RMGI/CS], Biodentine, Lime-Lite Enhanced, TheraCal LC, Vitrebond Plus) were applied to dentin and leveled with the tape. Specimens were treated with adhesive, cured, and bonded with resin composite using the Ultradent fixture. Specimens were stored in 37°C water for 24 ± 2 hours and debonded at 1 mm/min. SBS was analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey post hoc test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in SBS among materials for both caries-affected and caries-free dentin (p<0.01). Tukey post hoc analysis grouped materials into significantly different groups for caries-free dentin (Lime-Lite Enhanced, Biodentine < TheraCal LC < Vitrebond Plus, RMGI/CS) and caries-affected dentin (Lime-Lite Enhanced, Biodentine, TheraCal LC < Vitrebond Plus, RMGI/CS). There was no difference in SBS to caries-free and caries-affected dentin for Lime-Lite Enhanced (p=0.359), Biodentine (p=0.522), Vitrebond Plus (p=0.406), or RMGI/CS (p=0.165). SBS was significantly greater to caries-free dentin with TheraCal LC (p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RMGI/CS and Vitrebond Plus produced higher SBS to caries-free and caries-affected dentin than the three other materials. There was a higher bond to caries-free dentin than caries-affected dentin for TheraCal LC, but not for any of the other liners tested. Clinicians should balance biologic advantages of liner materials with a decrease in bond strength.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2341/24-112-L\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2341/24-112-L","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:牙衬用于无龋牙本质以降低术后敏感性,用于龋病牙本质以促进再矿化和抗菌作用。衬垫与龋病牙本质和无龋牙本质的剪切结合强度是修复大面积龋病牙的重要临床指标。目的:比较不同衬层对无龋牙本质和患龋牙本质的剪切结合强度(SBS)。方法和材料:SBS标本按ISO 29022:2013(E)制备(n=10/组)。无龋牙本质标本磨至浅牙本质。对于受龋齿影响的牙本质,对龋齿附近的牙本质进行研磨,用聚合物钻头去除剩余的龋齿感染的牙本质,并打磨至320砂砾,以获得平整的表面。150微米厚的胶带以无龋或受龋影响的牙本质为中心,将五种不同的衬垫(新型RMGI基硅酸钙衬垫[RMGI/CS]、Biodentine、Lime-Lite Enhanced、TheraCal LC、Vitrebond Plus)涂在牙本质上,并与胶带平整。使用Ultradent夹具对样品进行胶粘剂处理,固化,并与树脂复合材料粘合。标本在37℃水中保存24±2小时,以1 mm/min的速度脱粘。SBS采用双向方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验进行分析。结论:RMGI/CS和Vitrebond Plus对无龋牙本质和无龋牙本质的SBS均高于其他三种材料。与受龋齿影响的牙本质相比,TheraCal LC与无龋齿牙本质的结合程度更高,但其他测试的衬垫则没有。临床医生应平衡内衬材料的生物学优势与降低粘合强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shear Bond Strength of Liner Materials to Caries-Free and Caries-Affected Dentin.

Background: Dental liners are used on caries-free dentin to attenuate postoperative sensitivity and caries-affected dentin to promote remineralization and for antibacterial effects. The shear bond strength of liners to caries-affected and caries-free dentin is a significant clinical property in the restoration of teeth with large caries lesions. Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strengths (SBS) of different liners to caries-free and caries-affected dentin.

Methods and materials: SBS specimens were prepared according to ISO 29022:2013(E) (n=10/group). Caries-free dentin specimens were ground to superficial dentin. For caries-affected dentin, grinding to proximity of carious dentin was performed, remaining caries-infected dentin was removed with a polymer bur, and sanding to 320 grit was conducted to achieve a flat surface. 150-micron thick tape was centered over caries-free or caries-affected dentin, and five different liners (new RMGI-based calcium silicate liner [RMGI/CS], Biodentine, Lime-Lite Enhanced, TheraCal LC, Vitrebond Plus) were applied to dentin and leveled with the tape. Specimens were treated with adhesive, cured, and bonded with resin composite using the Ultradent fixture. Specimens were stored in 37°C water for 24 ± 2 hours and debonded at 1 mm/min. SBS was analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey post hoc test.

Results: There was a significant difference in SBS among materials for both caries-affected and caries-free dentin (p<0.01). Tukey post hoc analysis grouped materials into significantly different groups for caries-free dentin (Lime-Lite Enhanced, Biodentine < TheraCal LC < Vitrebond Plus, RMGI/CS) and caries-affected dentin (Lime-Lite Enhanced, Biodentine, TheraCal LC < Vitrebond Plus, RMGI/CS). There was no difference in SBS to caries-free and caries-affected dentin for Lime-Lite Enhanced (p=0.359), Biodentine (p=0.522), Vitrebond Plus (p=0.406), or RMGI/CS (p=0.165). SBS was significantly greater to caries-free dentin with TheraCal LC (p<0.01).

Conclusions: RMGI/CS and Vitrebond Plus produced higher SBS to caries-free and caries-affected dentin than the three other materials. There was a higher bond to caries-free dentin than caries-affected dentin for TheraCal LC, but not for any of the other liners tested. Clinicians should balance biologic advantages of liner materials with a decrease in bond strength.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operative dentistry
Operative dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Operative Dentistry is a refereed, international journal published bi-monthly and distributed to subscribers in over 50 countries. In 2012, we printed 84 articles (672 pages). Papers were submitted by authors from 45 countries, in the categories of Clinical Research, Laboratory Research, Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations and Invited Papers, as well as Editorials and Abstracts. One of the strong points of our journal is that our current publication time for accepted manuscripts is 4 to 6 months from the date of submission. Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations have a very quick turnaround time, which allows for very rapid publication of clinical based concepts. We also provide color for those papers that would benefit from its use. The journal does not accept any advertising but you will find postings for faculty positions. Additionally, the journal also does not rent, sell or otherwise allow its subscriber list to be used by any other entity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信