{"title":"Fungitell STAT即时检测在侵袭性真菌疾病诊断中的应用","authors":"Camille Cordier, Nicolas Lauwerier, Emmanuel Faure, Julien Poissy, Anahita Rouzé, Nadine François, Fanny Vuotto, Séverine Loridant, Jordan Leroy, Marjorie Cornu, Boualem Sendid","doi":"10.1093/mmy/myaf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1→3)-ß-d-glucans (BDG), major cell wall components of most pathogenic fungi, are useful for the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases (IFD) due to their high negative predictive value. For several years, a number of BDG detection tests are commercially available, including Fungitell Assay (FA) and Wako assay, and more recently Fungitell STAT (STAT) unit test. Our aim was to compare the performance of the two Fungitell assays for IFD diagnosis. Sera from 90 patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP, n = 30), candidemia (n = 30), and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA, n = 30), 30 patients colonized by P. jirovecii, and 70 healthy controls (women followed-up during pregnancy) were analyzed retrospectively. STAT and FA assays were performed according to manufacturer's instructions. The overall level of agreement between two Fungitell assays was excellent (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.87 [95% CI: 0.80-0.94]). BDG rates were significantly higher in candidemia, IPA and PJP than in healthy controls (P < .0001). BDG rates were also significantly higher in PJP than for P. jirovecii colonization (P < .0001). Area Under the Curve (AUC) of STAT (0.92) was higher than FA (0.86) for IFD diagnosis. Using optimized positivity thresholds for IFD diagnosis (94 pg/ml and 0.86 for FA and STAT, respectively), sensitivities and specificities were 78.9% and 90% for FA and 85.6% and 88.6% for STAT, respectively. AUC of FA and STAT were higher for PJP diagnosis than for candidemia and IPA diagnosis. Compared to FA, STAT assay represents an interesting option for emergency IFD diagnosis and for small care centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":18586,"journal":{"name":"Medical mycology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Fungitell STAT point-of-care test for the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Camille Cordier, Nicolas Lauwerier, Emmanuel Faure, Julien Poissy, Anahita Rouzé, Nadine François, Fanny Vuotto, Séverine Loridant, Jordan Leroy, Marjorie Cornu, Boualem Sendid\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mmy/myaf050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>(1→3)-ß-d-glucans (BDG), major cell wall components of most pathogenic fungi, are useful for the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases (IFD) due to their high negative predictive value. For several years, a number of BDG detection tests are commercially available, including Fungitell Assay (FA) and Wako assay, and more recently Fungitell STAT (STAT) unit test. Our aim was to compare the performance of the two Fungitell assays for IFD diagnosis. Sera from 90 patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP, n = 30), candidemia (n = 30), and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA, n = 30), 30 patients colonized by P. jirovecii, and 70 healthy controls (women followed-up during pregnancy) were analyzed retrospectively. STAT and FA assays were performed according to manufacturer's instructions. The overall level of agreement between two Fungitell assays was excellent (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.87 [95% CI: 0.80-0.94]). BDG rates were significantly higher in candidemia, IPA and PJP than in healthy controls (P < .0001). BDG rates were also significantly higher in PJP than for P. jirovecii colonization (P < .0001). Area Under the Curve (AUC) of STAT (0.92) was higher than FA (0.86) for IFD diagnosis. Using optimized positivity thresholds for IFD diagnosis (94 pg/ml and 0.86 for FA and STAT, respectively), sensitivities and specificities were 78.9% and 90% for FA and 85.6% and 88.6% for STAT, respectively. AUC of FA and STAT were higher for PJP diagnosis than for candidemia and IPA diagnosis. Compared to FA, STAT assay represents an interesting option for emergency IFD diagnosis and for small care centers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical mycology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical mycology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myaf050\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical mycology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myaf050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
(1→3)-ß-d-葡聚糖(BDG)是大多数病原真菌的主要细胞壁成分,具有较高的阴性预测值,可用于诊断侵袭性真菌病(IFD)。几年来,许多BDG检测测试已经商业化,包括Fungitell Assay (FA)和Wako Assay,以及最近的Fungitell STAT单元测试。我们的目的是比较两种真菌检测法诊断IFD的性能。回顾性分析了90例齐罗氏肺囊虫肺炎(PJP, n = 30)、念珠菌病(n = 30)和侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA, n = 30)、齐罗氏肺囊虫定殖患者(30例)和70例健康对照(妊娠期随访妇女)的血清。STAT和FA检测按照制造商的说明进行。两种Fungitell试验的总体一致性非常好(加权Cohen’s kappa = 0.87 [95% CI: 0.80-0.94])。念珠菌病、IPA和PJP患者的BDG率显著高于健康对照组(p
Performance of Fungitell STAT point-of-care test for the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases.
(1→3)-ß-d-glucans (BDG), major cell wall components of most pathogenic fungi, are useful for the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases (IFD) due to their high negative predictive value. For several years, a number of BDG detection tests are commercially available, including Fungitell Assay (FA) and Wako assay, and more recently Fungitell STAT (STAT) unit test. Our aim was to compare the performance of the two Fungitell assays for IFD diagnosis. Sera from 90 patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP, n = 30), candidemia (n = 30), and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA, n = 30), 30 patients colonized by P. jirovecii, and 70 healthy controls (women followed-up during pregnancy) were analyzed retrospectively. STAT and FA assays were performed according to manufacturer's instructions. The overall level of agreement between two Fungitell assays was excellent (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.87 [95% CI: 0.80-0.94]). BDG rates were significantly higher in candidemia, IPA and PJP than in healthy controls (P < .0001). BDG rates were also significantly higher in PJP than for P. jirovecii colonization (P < .0001). Area Under the Curve (AUC) of STAT (0.92) was higher than FA (0.86) for IFD diagnosis. Using optimized positivity thresholds for IFD diagnosis (94 pg/ml and 0.86 for FA and STAT, respectively), sensitivities and specificities were 78.9% and 90% for FA and 85.6% and 88.6% for STAT, respectively. AUC of FA and STAT were higher for PJP diagnosis than for candidemia and IPA diagnosis. Compared to FA, STAT assay represents an interesting option for emergency IFD diagnosis and for small care centers.
期刊介绍:
Medical Mycology is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on original and innovative basic and applied studies, as well as learned reviews on all aspects of medical, veterinary and environmental mycology as related to disease. The objective is to present the highest quality scientific reports from throughout the world on divergent topics. These topics include the phylogeny of fungal pathogens, epidemiology and public health mycology themes, new approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of mycoses including clinical trials and guidelines, pharmacology and antifungal susceptibilities, changes in taxonomy, description of new or unusual fungi associated with human or animal disease, immunology of fungal infections, vaccinology for prevention of fungal infections, pathogenesis and virulence, and the molecular biology of pathogenic fungi in vitro and in vivo, including genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and proteomics. Case reports are no longer accepted. In addition, studies of natural products showing inhibitory activity against pathogenic fungi are not accepted without chemical characterization and identification of the compounds responsible for the inhibitory activity.