{"title":"书面暴露治疗组在虚拟门诊环境中的可行性和可接受性。","authors":"Adam G Horwitz, Kaitlyn McCarthy, James Abelson","doi":"10.1002/jts.23175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Written exposure therapy (WET) has emerged as a promising treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with the potential to overcome common barriers to engagement. Several facets of WET lend themselves particularly well for adaptation to a group setting, yet few studies have examined WET in such formats. The objective of the present study was to present preliminary feasibility, acceptability, and clinical outcome data from a quality improvement project conducted in an outpatient psychiatry clinic that included patients who engaged in a virtual WET group. Participants were 28 adults from six WET group cohorts that occurred between January 2024 and March 2025. Overall attendance was strong (78.2%), with 67.9% of participants completing at least five of the six weekly sessions. Patient satisfaction ratings were high (80.0%), and 86.7% of participants indicated that they would recommend the group to other individuals struggling with trauma symptoms. Acceptability ratings were also largely supportive of the virtual (vs. in-person) and group (vs. individual) formats. There were large effect sizes for pre-post improvement in PTSD symptoms (PCL-5: M = 52.6 vs. 33.0), d = 1.39, and depressive symptoms (PHQ-9: M = 14.2 vs. 9.9), d = 0.86, among participants who completed the group. Our study provides preliminary data suggesting the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual WET group delivered in a naturalistic community setting, with strong attendance and high patient satisfaction. There is significant benefit to standardizing a group-based WET protocol and substantiating clinical benefits through a fully powered randomized controlled clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and acceptability of written exposure therapy group in a virtual outpatient setting.\",\"authors\":\"Adam G Horwitz, Kaitlyn McCarthy, James Abelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jts.23175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Written exposure therapy (WET) has emerged as a promising treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with the potential to overcome common barriers to engagement. Several facets of WET lend themselves particularly well for adaptation to a group setting, yet few studies have examined WET in such formats. The objective of the present study was to present preliminary feasibility, acceptability, and clinical outcome data from a quality improvement project conducted in an outpatient psychiatry clinic that included patients who engaged in a virtual WET group. Participants were 28 adults from six WET group cohorts that occurred between January 2024 and March 2025. Overall attendance was strong (78.2%), with 67.9% of participants completing at least five of the six weekly sessions. Patient satisfaction ratings were high (80.0%), and 86.7% of participants indicated that they would recommend the group to other individuals struggling with trauma symptoms. Acceptability ratings were also largely supportive of the virtual (vs. in-person) and group (vs. individual) formats. There were large effect sizes for pre-post improvement in PTSD symptoms (PCL-5: M = 52.6 vs. 33.0), d = 1.39, and depressive symptoms (PHQ-9: M = 14.2 vs. 9.9), d = 0.86, among participants who completed the group. Our study provides preliminary data suggesting the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual WET group delivered in a naturalistic community setting, with strong attendance and high patient satisfaction. There is significant benefit to standardizing a group-based WET protocol and substantiating clinical benefits through a fully powered randomized controlled clinical trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of traumatic stress\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of traumatic stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.23175\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traumatic stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.23175","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
书面暴露疗法(WET)作为一种很有前途的治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的方法,有可能克服常见的参与障碍。WET的几个方面特别适合适应群体环境,但很少有研究以这种形式考察WET。本研究的目的是提出初步的可行性、可接受性和临床结果数据,这些数据来自于在门诊精神病学诊所进行的质量改进项目,该项目包括参与虚拟WET组的患者。参与者是来自2024年1月至2025年3月期间六个WET组队列的28名成年人。总体出勤率很高(78.2%),67.9%的参与者完成了每周六次课程中的至少五次。患者满意度评分很高(80.0%),86.7%的参与者表示他们会向其他与创伤症状作斗争的人推荐该小组。接受度评级也在很大程度上支持虚拟(vs.面对面)和团体(vs.个人)形式。在完成该组的参与者中,PTSD症状(PCL-5: M = 52.6 vs. 33.0)和抑郁症状(PHQ-9: M = 14.2 vs. 9.9)的前后改善的效应量很大,d = 0.86。我们的研究提供了初步数据,表明在自然的社区环境中提供虚拟WET小组的可行性和可接受性,出勤率高,患者满意度高。标准化基于组的WET方案和通过全动力随机对照临床试验证实临床益处是有显著好处的。
Feasibility and acceptability of written exposure therapy group in a virtual outpatient setting.
Written exposure therapy (WET) has emerged as a promising treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with the potential to overcome common barriers to engagement. Several facets of WET lend themselves particularly well for adaptation to a group setting, yet few studies have examined WET in such formats. The objective of the present study was to present preliminary feasibility, acceptability, and clinical outcome data from a quality improvement project conducted in an outpatient psychiatry clinic that included patients who engaged in a virtual WET group. Participants were 28 adults from six WET group cohorts that occurred between January 2024 and March 2025. Overall attendance was strong (78.2%), with 67.9% of participants completing at least five of the six weekly sessions. Patient satisfaction ratings were high (80.0%), and 86.7% of participants indicated that they would recommend the group to other individuals struggling with trauma symptoms. Acceptability ratings were also largely supportive of the virtual (vs. in-person) and group (vs. individual) formats. There were large effect sizes for pre-post improvement in PTSD symptoms (PCL-5: M = 52.6 vs. 33.0), d = 1.39, and depressive symptoms (PHQ-9: M = 14.2 vs. 9.9), d = 0.86, among participants who completed the group. Our study provides preliminary data suggesting the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual WET group delivered in a naturalistic community setting, with strong attendance and high patient satisfaction. There is significant benefit to standardizing a group-based WET protocol and substantiating clinical benefits through a fully powered randomized controlled clinical trial.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Traumatic Stress (JTS) is published for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress , the official publication for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on biopsychosocial aspects of trauma. Papers focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention education/training, and legal and policy concerns. Journal of Traumatic Stress serves as a primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events (directly or through their occupational roles), such as war, disaster, accident, violence or abuse (criminal or familial), hostage-taking, or life-threatening illness. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, review papers, commentaries, and, from time to time, special issues devoted to a single topic.