前循环大血管闭塞患者血管内治疗前静脉阿替普酶溶栓的动脉侧支状态和治疗效果:MR CLEAN-NO IV试验的预先分析

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Wenjin Yang, Fabiano Cavalcante, Kilian M Treurniet, Manon Kappelhof, Agnetha A E Bruggeman, Lennard Wolff, Leon A Rinkel, Natalie E LeCouffe, Ivo G H Jansen, Aashish Venkatesh, Olvert A Berkhemer, Anouk van der Hoorn, Marieke E Sprengers, Bart J Emmer, Jonathan M Coutinho, Yvo B W E M Roos, Wim van Zwam, Robert van Oostenbrugge, Henk A Marquering, Charles B L M Majoie
{"title":"前循环大血管闭塞患者血管内治疗前静脉阿替普酶溶栓的动脉侧支状态和治疗效果:MR CLEAN-NO IV试验的预先分析","authors":"Wenjin Yang, Fabiano Cavalcante, Kilian M Treurniet, Manon Kappelhof, Agnetha A E Bruggeman, Lennard Wolff, Leon A Rinkel, Natalie E LeCouffe, Ivo G H Jansen, Aashish Venkatesh, Olvert A Berkhemer, Anouk van der Hoorn, Marieke E Sprengers, Bart J Emmer, Jonathan M Coutinho, Yvo B W E M Roos, Wim van Zwam, Robert van Oostenbrugge, Henk A Marquering, Charles B L M Majoie","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-023054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Collateral blood flow to the affected cerebral territory in acute ischemic stroke may modify the effect of intravenous alteplase treatment (IVT) prior to endovascular treatment (EVT). We assessed whether an interaction effect between arterial collateral status, assessed by both a visual and quantitative collateral score (CS), and administration of IVT plus EVT was present in the MR CLEAN-NO IV trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline CT or MR angiography (CTA and MRA) from patients included in MR CLEAN-NO IV was assessed using both a visual and automated quantitative score for arterial collateral status. We included 526 patients with visual CS and 401 with quantitative CS in this prespecified analysis. The primary outcome was functional outcome measured as the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. Interaction terms of treatment allocation (IVT plus EVT vs EVT alone) and collateral scores were included in regression models to assess whether the treatment effect of IVT differed by arterial collateral status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IVT plus EVT was not statistically significantly associated with better functional outcome compared with EVT alone (adjusted common odds ratio 1.14; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.55). There was no statistically significant modification of IVT treatment effect on functional outcome by either visual or quantitative CS (adjusted p-interaction=0.34; adjusted p-interaction=0.57, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the MR CLEAN-NO IV trial, we did not find evidence that arterial collateral status measured with a visual score or quantitative score can inform treatment decisions regarding IVT plus EVT for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation within 4.5 hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1051-1058"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arterial collateral status and treatment effect of intravenous alteplase thrombolysis prior to endovascular treatment in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion: prespecified analysis of the MR CLEAN-NO IV trial.\",\"authors\":\"Wenjin Yang, Fabiano Cavalcante, Kilian M Treurniet, Manon Kappelhof, Agnetha A E Bruggeman, Lennard Wolff, Leon A Rinkel, Natalie E LeCouffe, Ivo G H Jansen, Aashish Venkatesh, Olvert A Berkhemer, Anouk van der Hoorn, Marieke E Sprengers, Bart J Emmer, Jonathan M Coutinho, Yvo B W E M Roos, Wim van Zwam, Robert van Oostenbrugge, Henk A Marquering, Charles B L M Majoie\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnis-2025-023054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Collateral blood flow to the affected cerebral territory in acute ischemic stroke may modify the effect of intravenous alteplase treatment (IVT) prior to endovascular treatment (EVT). We assessed whether an interaction effect between arterial collateral status, assessed by both a visual and quantitative collateral score (CS), and administration of IVT plus EVT was present in the MR CLEAN-NO IV trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline CT or MR angiography (CTA and MRA) from patients included in MR CLEAN-NO IV was assessed using both a visual and automated quantitative score for arterial collateral status. We included 526 patients with visual CS and 401 with quantitative CS in this prespecified analysis. The primary outcome was functional outcome measured as the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. Interaction terms of treatment allocation (IVT plus EVT vs EVT alone) and collateral scores were included in regression models to assess whether the treatment effect of IVT differed by arterial collateral status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IVT plus EVT was not statistically significantly associated with better functional outcome compared with EVT alone (adjusted common odds ratio 1.14; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.55). There was no statistically significant modification of IVT treatment effect on functional outcome by either visual or quantitative CS (adjusted p-interaction=0.34; adjusted p-interaction=0.57, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the MR CLEAN-NO IV trial, we did not find evidence that arterial collateral status measured with a visual score or quantitative score can inform treatment decisions regarding IVT plus EVT for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation within 4.5 hours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1051-1058\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023054\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023054","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:急性缺血性卒中患者侧支血流量可能改变血管内治疗(EVT)前静脉注射阿替普酶治疗(IVT)的效果。在MR CLEAN-NO IV试验中,我们评估了动脉侧支状态(通过视觉和定量侧支评分(CS)评估)与IVT加EVT给药之间是否存在相互作用。方法:对MR CLEAN-NO IV组患者的基线CT或MR血管造影(CTA和MRA)进行评估,使用视觉和自动定量评分来评估动脉侧支状态。在这个预先指定的分析中,我们纳入了526例视觉CS和401例定量CS。主要结局是功能性结局,在90天时用改良Rankin量表评分来衡量。回归模型包括治疗分配(IVT + EVT vs单独EVT)和侧支评分的相互作用项,以评估IVT治疗效果是否因动脉侧支状态而异。结果:与单独EVT相比,IVT加EVT与更好的功能预后无统计学意义(校正常见优势比1.14;95% CI 0.84 ~ 1.55)。IVT治疗对功能预后的影响在目测或定量CS中均无统计学意义的改变(校正p相互作用=0.34;调整p-相互作用=0.57)。结论:在MR CLEAN-NO IV试验中,我们没有发现证据表明,用视觉评分或定量评分测量动脉侧支状态可以为4.5小时内因前循环大血管闭塞引起的急性缺血性卒中患者的IVT + EVT治疗决策提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arterial collateral status and treatment effect of intravenous alteplase thrombolysis prior to endovascular treatment in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion: prespecified analysis of the MR CLEAN-NO IV trial.

Background and purpose: Collateral blood flow to the affected cerebral territory in acute ischemic stroke may modify the effect of intravenous alteplase treatment (IVT) prior to endovascular treatment (EVT). We assessed whether an interaction effect between arterial collateral status, assessed by both a visual and quantitative collateral score (CS), and administration of IVT plus EVT was present in the MR CLEAN-NO IV trial.

Methods: Baseline CT or MR angiography (CTA and MRA) from patients included in MR CLEAN-NO IV was assessed using both a visual and automated quantitative score for arterial collateral status. We included 526 patients with visual CS and 401 with quantitative CS in this prespecified analysis. The primary outcome was functional outcome measured as the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. Interaction terms of treatment allocation (IVT plus EVT vs EVT alone) and collateral scores were included in regression models to assess whether the treatment effect of IVT differed by arterial collateral status.

Results: IVT plus EVT was not statistically significantly associated with better functional outcome compared with EVT alone (adjusted common odds ratio 1.14; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.55). There was no statistically significant modification of IVT treatment effect on functional outcome by either visual or quantitative CS (adjusted p-interaction=0.34; adjusted p-interaction=0.57, respectively).

Conclusion: In the MR CLEAN-NO IV trial, we did not find evidence that arterial collateral status measured with a visual score or quantitative score can inform treatment decisions regarding IVT plus EVT for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation within 4.5 hours.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信