Laura Good, Hava Blair, Jessica Sherman, Eric Young
{"title":"测试威斯康星州跨种植系统的磷指数评估。","authors":"Laura Good, Hava Blair, Jessica Sherman, Eric Young","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Managing agricultural runoff phosphorus (P) often requires understanding management effects on both dissolved P (DP) and particulate (sediment-bound) P (PP). The Wisconsin P index (WPI) allows producers to assess land management effects on runoff P by estimating annual P losses in mass per unit area. We used monitoring data to test the WPI's ability to identify P loss tradeoffs between tilled corn silage and perennial forage cropping systems and WPI's sensitivity to treatment differences within each cropping system. Overall, WPI P loss estimates were supported by monitoring results, with higher total P losses for the corn system dominated by PP (84%) and smaller losses from the perennial forage system dominated by DP (86%). Notably, the WPI also distinguished most treatment differences within systems. Greater than 50% of annual runoff occurred during winter for both systems and was generally underestimated by WPI. However, when measured suspended sediment, precipitation, and runoff were used in the WPI, stronger relationships between measured and estimated PP kg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> (<i>r</i><sup>2 </sup>= 0.94–0.95) and DP kg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> (<i>r</i><sup>2 </sup>= 0.63–0.91) were observed. The WPI also underestimated sediment P concentration and DP loss from hay while overestimating DP loss from corn, highlighting specific opportunities for improvement. The WPI is embedded in nutrient management planning software widely used in Wisconsin (available online at snapplus.wisc.edu); however, the model can be adapted to other cold climate regions to support both crop production and environmental sustainability goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":"54 5","pages":"1271-1287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeq2.70042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing Wisconsin P index assessments across cropping systems\",\"authors\":\"Laura Good, Hava Blair, Jessica Sherman, Eric Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeq2.70042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Managing agricultural runoff phosphorus (P) often requires understanding management effects on both dissolved P (DP) and particulate (sediment-bound) P (PP). The Wisconsin P index (WPI) allows producers to assess land management effects on runoff P by estimating annual P losses in mass per unit area. We used monitoring data to test the WPI's ability to identify P loss tradeoffs between tilled corn silage and perennial forage cropping systems and WPI's sensitivity to treatment differences within each cropping system. Overall, WPI P loss estimates were supported by monitoring results, with higher total P losses for the corn system dominated by PP (84%) and smaller losses from the perennial forage system dominated by DP (86%). Notably, the WPI also distinguished most treatment differences within systems. Greater than 50% of annual runoff occurred during winter for both systems and was generally underestimated by WPI. However, when measured suspended sediment, precipitation, and runoff were used in the WPI, stronger relationships between measured and estimated PP kg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> (<i>r</i><sup>2 </sup>= 0.94–0.95) and DP kg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> (<i>r</i><sup>2 </sup>= 0.63–0.91) were observed. The WPI also underestimated sediment P concentration and DP loss from hay while overestimating DP loss from corn, highlighting specific opportunities for improvement. The WPI is embedded in nutrient management planning software widely used in Wisconsin (available online at snapplus.wisc.edu); however, the model can be adapted to other cold climate regions to support both crop production and environmental sustainability goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"1271-1287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeq2.70042\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeq2.70042\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeq2.70042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
管理农业径流磷(P)通常需要了解对溶解磷(DP)和颗粒(沉积物结合)磷(PP)的管理效果。威斯康星磷指数(WPI)允许生产者通过估算单位面积每年磷的质量损失来评估土地管理对径流磷的影响。我们使用监测数据来测试WPI识别耕作玉米青贮和多年生牧草种植制度之间磷损失权衡的能力,以及WPI对每种种植制度内处理差异的敏感性。总体而言,WPI对磷损失的估计得到了监测结果的支持,以PP为主的玉米系统的总磷损失较高(84%),而以DP为主的多年生牧草系统的总磷损失较小(86%)。值得注意的是,WPI还区分了系统内的大多数待遇差异。两个系统年径流量的50%以上发生在冬季,WPI普遍低估了这一点。然而,当在WPI中使用测量到的悬浮泥沙、降水和径流时,观测到的和估计的PP kg ha-1 -1 (r2 = 0.94-0.95)和DP kg ha-1 -1 (r2 = 0.63-0.91)之间存在更强的关系。WPI还低估了沉积物P浓度和干草的DP损失,而高估了玉米的DP损失,强调了具体的改进机会。WPI嵌入在威斯康星州广泛使用的营养管理计划软件中(可在snapplus.wis.edu在线获得);然而,该模型可以适用于其他寒冷气候地区,以支持作物生产和环境可持续性目标。
Testing Wisconsin P index assessments across cropping systems
Managing agricultural runoff phosphorus (P) often requires understanding management effects on both dissolved P (DP) and particulate (sediment-bound) P (PP). The Wisconsin P index (WPI) allows producers to assess land management effects on runoff P by estimating annual P losses in mass per unit area. We used monitoring data to test the WPI's ability to identify P loss tradeoffs between tilled corn silage and perennial forage cropping systems and WPI's sensitivity to treatment differences within each cropping system. Overall, WPI P loss estimates were supported by monitoring results, with higher total P losses for the corn system dominated by PP (84%) and smaller losses from the perennial forage system dominated by DP (86%). Notably, the WPI also distinguished most treatment differences within systems. Greater than 50% of annual runoff occurred during winter for both systems and was generally underestimated by WPI. However, when measured suspended sediment, precipitation, and runoff were used in the WPI, stronger relationships between measured and estimated PP kg ha−1 year−1 (r2 = 0.94–0.95) and DP kg ha−1 year−1 (r2 = 0.63–0.91) were observed. The WPI also underestimated sediment P concentration and DP loss from hay while overestimating DP loss from corn, highlighting specific opportunities for improvement. The WPI is embedded in nutrient management planning software widely used in Wisconsin (available online at snapplus.wisc.edu); however, the model can be adapted to other cold climate regions to support both crop production and environmental sustainability goals.
期刊介绍:
Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring.
Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.