Avi Tsafrir, Tamar Artom, Raoul Orvieto, Jordana H Hyman, Zivit Worcman, Shlomit Tsafrir
{"title":"试管婴儿中管理父母能力的问题:儿童福利委员会的角色——对单位主任的调查。","authors":"Avi Tsafrir, Tamar Artom, Raoul Orvieto, Jordana H Hyman, Zivit Worcman, Shlomit Tsafrir","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03529-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine whether Child Welfare Advisory Committees (CWCs) assist IVF unit directors in addressing concerns about prospective parental capacity (PC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey of 26 IVF unit directors in Israel was conducted in November 2023, focusing on referrals to CWCs, reasons for referral, and satisfaction with CWC services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 26 directors, 23 responded (88%). Over a 3-year period, 21 (91%) reported referring candidates to CWCs, with referral counts ranging from 1 to \"over 30.\" The most frequently cited concerns were cognitive developmental disability (16 directors, 72%), mental illness (also 16, 72%), and severe physical disability (10, 43%). Thirteen directors (57%) rated CWC availability and quality as reasonable, while five (21%) found services insufficient, and three (13%) reported no access at all. Ten directors (43%) used alternative strategies, including denying treatment without CWC input, referring patients elsewhere, or prolonging the assessment to encourage withdrawal. One in four respondents reported facing legal or administrative challenges following further evaluation requests or treatment refusals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Concerns about prospective PC are relatively uncommon but present in all IVF units. The most frequent concerns relate to cognitive developmental disability, mental illness, and severe physical disabilities. While most directors consult CWCs in such cases, satisfaction with their function is mixed. These findings highlight the need for clearer guidelines and more accessible, consistent consultation structures to support clinicians in managing complex cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing parental capacity concerns in IVF: the role of child welfare committees-a survey of unit directors.\",\"authors\":\"Avi Tsafrir, Tamar Artom, Raoul Orvieto, Jordana H Hyman, Zivit Worcman, Shlomit Tsafrir\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10815-025-03529-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine whether Child Welfare Advisory Committees (CWCs) assist IVF unit directors in addressing concerns about prospective parental capacity (PC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey of 26 IVF unit directors in Israel was conducted in November 2023, focusing on referrals to CWCs, reasons for referral, and satisfaction with CWC services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 26 directors, 23 responded (88%). Over a 3-year period, 21 (91%) reported referring candidates to CWCs, with referral counts ranging from 1 to \\\"over 30.\\\" The most frequently cited concerns were cognitive developmental disability (16 directors, 72%), mental illness (also 16, 72%), and severe physical disability (10, 43%). Thirteen directors (57%) rated CWC availability and quality as reasonable, while five (21%) found services insufficient, and three (13%) reported no access at all. Ten directors (43%) used alternative strategies, including denying treatment without CWC input, referring patients elsewhere, or prolonging the assessment to encourage withdrawal. One in four respondents reported facing legal or administrative challenges following further evaluation requests or treatment refusals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Concerns about prospective PC are relatively uncommon but present in all IVF units. The most frequent concerns relate to cognitive developmental disability, mental illness, and severe physical disabilities. While most directors consult CWCs in such cases, satisfaction with their function is mixed. These findings highlight the need for clearer guidelines and more accessible, consistent consultation structures to support clinicians in managing complex cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03529-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03529-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Managing parental capacity concerns in IVF: the role of child welfare committees-a survey of unit directors.
Purpose: To examine whether Child Welfare Advisory Committees (CWCs) assist IVF unit directors in addressing concerns about prospective parental capacity (PC).
Methods: An anonymous online survey of 26 IVF unit directors in Israel was conducted in November 2023, focusing on referrals to CWCs, reasons for referral, and satisfaction with CWC services.
Results: Of the 26 directors, 23 responded (88%). Over a 3-year period, 21 (91%) reported referring candidates to CWCs, with referral counts ranging from 1 to "over 30." The most frequently cited concerns were cognitive developmental disability (16 directors, 72%), mental illness (also 16, 72%), and severe physical disability (10, 43%). Thirteen directors (57%) rated CWC availability and quality as reasonable, while five (21%) found services insufficient, and three (13%) reported no access at all. Ten directors (43%) used alternative strategies, including denying treatment without CWC input, referring patients elsewhere, or prolonging the assessment to encourage withdrawal. One in four respondents reported facing legal or administrative challenges following further evaluation requests or treatment refusals.
Conclusions: Concerns about prospective PC are relatively uncommon but present in all IVF units. The most frequent concerns relate to cognitive developmental disability, mental illness, and severe physical disabilities. While most directors consult CWCs in such cases, satisfaction with their function is mixed. These findings highlight the need for clearer guidelines and more accessible, consistent consultation structures to support clinicians in managing complex cases.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species.
The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.