治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的替代抗生素:疗效和安全性的系统评价。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Ana Clara Valente de Alencar, Athus Graziani Apollaro Rego, Carolina Soares Chady, Alisson Gabriel Maués Miranda, Lara Fernanda Alves de Souza, João Vitor Martins Pinto, Bárbara de Souza Maia do Nascimento, Camili Giseli Oliveira de Menezes, Isa Mendes Moreira, José Carlos Favacho Furlan, Ester Carolina Vieira Maia, Maria Fernanda Nakayama Martins, Nayara Cristina Cardoso da Silva, Paula do Socorro de Oliveira da Costa Laurindo, Luis Edilson de Azevedo Ferreira, Antônio Rafael Quadros Gomes, Heliton Patrick Cordovil Brígido
{"title":"治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的替代抗生素:疗效和安全性的系统评价。","authors":"Ana Clara Valente de Alencar, Athus Graziani Apollaro Rego, Carolina Soares Chady, Alisson Gabriel Maués Miranda, Lara Fernanda Alves de Souza, João Vitor Martins Pinto, Bárbara de Souza Maia do Nascimento, Camili Giseli Oliveira de Menezes, Isa Mendes Moreira, José Carlos Favacho Furlan, Ester Carolina Vieira Maia, Maria Fernanda Nakayama Martins, Nayara Cristina Cardoso da Silva, Paula do Socorro de Oliveira da Costa Laurindo, Luis Edilson de Azevedo Ferreira, Antônio Rafael Quadros Gomes, Heliton Patrick Cordovil Brígido","doi":"10.1016/j.jped.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alternative antibiotics and different standard treatment regimens for bacterial meningitis in children, considering the increasing antimicrobial resistance and the need for adapted therapeutic options. To justify the use of alternative antibiotics, the authors analyzed the specific efficacy of ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime and meropenem, which showed potential to overcome cases of antimicrobial resistance.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A search was performed in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, without data restrictions, including planned clinical trials that compared alternative antibiotics and different standard treatment regimens, such as ceftriaxone, in children with bacterial meningitis. Inclusion criteria include studies reporting cure rates, complications and safety of treatments.</p><p><strong>Summary of results: </strong>An analysis of 14 studies, totaling 2,014 children, indicated that antibiotics such as ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime and meropenem had comparable efficacy and safety to standard treatment regimens. The review showed that, in many cases, alternative regimens and shorter treatment durations could be effective, without significantly increasing complications or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that alternatives to standard treatment, such as ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime and meropenem, are viable and safe options for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children. These results help to adapt clinical practices, especially in settings with high antimicrobial resistance and resource limitations, by providing evidence for shorter and equally effective treatment regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":14867,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de pediatria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children: a systematic review of efficacy and safety.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Clara Valente de Alencar, Athus Graziani Apollaro Rego, Carolina Soares Chady, Alisson Gabriel Maués Miranda, Lara Fernanda Alves de Souza, João Vitor Martins Pinto, Bárbara de Souza Maia do Nascimento, Camili Giseli Oliveira de Menezes, Isa Mendes Moreira, José Carlos Favacho Furlan, Ester Carolina Vieira Maia, Maria Fernanda Nakayama Martins, Nayara Cristina Cardoso da Silva, Paula do Socorro de Oliveira da Costa Laurindo, Luis Edilson de Azevedo Ferreira, Antônio Rafael Quadros Gomes, Heliton Patrick Cordovil Brígido\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jped.2025.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alternative antibiotics and different standard treatment regimens for bacterial meningitis in children, considering the increasing antimicrobial resistance and the need for adapted therapeutic options. To justify the use of alternative antibiotics, the authors analyzed the specific efficacy of ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime and meropenem, which showed potential to overcome cases of antimicrobial resistance.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A search was performed in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, without data restrictions, including planned clinical trials that compared alternative antibiotics and different standard treatment regimens, such as ceftriaxone, in children with bacterial meningitis. Inclusion criteria include studies reporting cure rates, complications and safety of treatments.</p><p><strong>Summary of results: </strong>An analysis of 14 studies, totaling 2,014 children, indicated that antibiotics such as ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime and meropenem had comparable efficacy and safety to standard treatment regimens. The review showed that, in many cases, alternative regimens and shorter treatment durations could be effective, without significantly increasing complications or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that alternatives to standard treatment, such as ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime and meropenem, are viable and safe options for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children. These results help to adapt clinical practices, especially in settings with high antimicrobial resistance and resource limitations, by providing evidence for shorter and equally effective treatment regimens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal de pediatria\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal de pediatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2025.05.002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2025.05.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述旨在评估替代抗生素和不同标准治疗方案对儿童细菌性脑膜炎的有效性和安全性,考虑到抗生素耐药性的增加和适应治疗方案的需要。为了证明使用替代抗生素的合理性,作者分析了氨苄西林、氯霉素、头孢呋辛和美罗培南的具体疗效,这些药物显示出克服抗菌素耐药性病例的潜力。数据来源:在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane Library等数据库中进行检索,没有数据限制,包括计划的临床试验,比较替代抗生素和不同的标准治疗方案,如头孢曲松,治疗细菌性脑膜炎儿童。纳入标准包括报告治愈率、并发症和治疗安全性的研究。结果总结:一项涉及2014名儿童的14项研究的分析表明,氨苄西林、氯霉素、头孢呋辛和美罗培南等抗生素与标准治疗方案的疗效和安全性相当。回顾显示,在许多情况下,替代方案和较短的治疗时间可能有效,而不会显著增加并发症或死亡率。结论:结果提示,氨苄西林、氯霉素、头孢呋辛、美罗培南等标准治疗方案是治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎可行且安全的选择。这些结果通过为更短和同样有效的治疗方案提供证据,有助于适应临床实践,特别是在抗菌素耐药性高和资源有限的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alternative antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children: a systematic review of efficacy and safety.

Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alternative antibiotics and different standard treatment regimens for bacterial meningitis in children, considering the increasing antimicrobial resistance and the need for adapted therapeutic options. To justify the use of alternative antibiotics, the authors analyzed the specific efficacy of ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime and meropenem, which showed potential to overcome cases of antimicrobial resistance.

Data sources: A search was performed in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, without data restrictions, including planned clinical trials that compared alternative antibiotics and different standard treatment regimens, such as ceftriaxone, in children with bacterial meningitis. Inclusion criteria include studies reporting cure rates, complications and safety of treatments.

Summary of results: An analysis of 14 studies, totaling 2,014 children, indicated that antibiotics such as ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime and meropenem had comparable efficacy and safety to standard treatment regimens. The review showed that, in many cases, alternative regimens and shorter treatment durations could be effective, without significantly increasing complications or mortality.

Conclusion: The results suggest that alternatives to standard treatment, such as ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime and meropenem, are viable and safe options for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children. These results help to adapt clinical practices, especially in settings with high antimicrobial resistance and resource limitations, by providing evidence for shorter and equally effective treatment regimens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal de pediatria
Jornal de pediatria 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Jornal de Pediatria is a bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics (Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria, SBP). It has been published without interruption since 1934. Jornal de Pediatria publishes original articles and review articles covering various areas in the field of pediatrics. By publishing relevant scientific contributions, Jornal de Pediatria aims at improving the standards of pediatrics and of the healthcare provided for children and adolescents in general, as well to foster debate about health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信