男性和女性乳腺癌患者的临床、治疗和预后差异——德国一项基于登记的研究对2510名男性和307634名女性进行了比较。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Marion Graf, Michael Gerken, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, Simone Schrodi, Armin Pauer, Karla Geiss, Olaf Ortmann, Elisabeth C Sturm-Inwald
{"title":"男性和女性乳腺癌患者的临床、治疗和预后差异——德国一项基于登记的研究对2510名男性和307634名女性进行了比较。","authors":"Marion Graf, Michael Gerken, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, Simone Schrodi, Armin Pauer, Karla Geiss, Olaf Ortmann, Elisabeth C Sturm-Inwald","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06220-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the present study was to compare patient, tumor characteristics and prognostic factors as well as diagnostics and therapies between men and women with breast cancer. The rates of primary distant metastases, contralateral second tumors, overall survival (OS), recurrence, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed and compared between men and women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patient data from 18 clinical cancer registries in Germany (2000-2018). Differences in risk factors and short-term endpoints were analyzed via univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses. OS, RFS, and the rate of subsequent second tumors were examined via Kaplan‒Meier, univariable and multivariable Cox regression methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with women, male patients with breast cancer presented a significantly greater risk of unfavorable prognostic factors, such as advanced stage, lymphatic invasion, and more primary distant metastases. While sentinel lymph node biopsy and HER-2 testing were comparable, treatment rates for men were 9.5-29.0% lower than those for women. In multivariable analyses, men had a 1.32-fold increased risk of death (95% CI 1.24-1.41; p < 0.001). The risk of recurrence/mortality was significantly increased by a factor of 1.531 (95% CI 1.43-1.65; p < 0.001). Adjustment for therapy in a multivariable regression model did not significantly affect the risk of death. Nevertheless, men had a survival benefit from systemic therapies comparable to that of women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neither patient and tumor characteristics nor differences in therapy could completely explain the difference in mortality between men and women. Differences in lifestyle or biological factors could play a role.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 6","pages":"181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12134001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical, therapeutic and prognostic differences between male and female patients with breast cancer-a comparison of 2510 men and 307,634 women in a registry-based study in Germany.\",\"authors\":\"Marion Graf, Michael Gerken, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, Simone Schrodi, Armin Pauer, Karla Geiss, Olaf Ortmann, Elisabeth C Sturm-Inwald\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00432-025-06220-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the present study was to compare patient, tumor characteristics and prognostic factors as well as diagnostics and therapies between men and women with breast cancer. The rates of primary distant metastases, contralateral second tumors, overall survival (OS), recurrence, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed and compared between men and women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patient data from 18 clinical cancer registries in Germany (2000-2018). Differences in risk factors and short-term endpoints were analyzed via univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses. OS, RFS, and the rate of subsequent second tumors were examined via Kaplan‒Meier, univariable and multivariable Cox regression methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with women, male patients with breast cancer presented a significantly greater risk of unfavorable prognostic factors, such as advanced stage, lymphatic invasion, and more primary distant metastases. While sentinel lymph node biopsy and HER-2 testing were comparable, treatment rates for men were 9.5-29.0% lower than those for women. In multivariable analyses, men had a 1.32-fold increased risk of death (95% CI 1.24-1.41; p < 0.001). The risk of recurrence/mortality was significantly increased by a factor of 1.531 (95% CI 1.43-1.65; p < 0.001). Adjustment for therapy in a multivariable regression model did not significantly affect the risk of death. Nevertheless, men had a survival benefit from systemic therapies comparable to that of women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neither patient and tumor characteristics nor differences in therapy could completely explain the difference in mortality between men and women. Differences in lifestyle or biological factors could play a role.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"151 6\",\"pages\":\"181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12134001/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06220-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06220-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较男性和女性乳腺癌患者、肿瘤特征、预后因素以及诊断和治疗方法。分析和比较男性和女性的原发性远处转移率、对侧第二肿瘤、总生存期(OS)、复发率和无复发生存率(RFS)。方法:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了德国18个临床癌症登记处(2000-2018)的患者数据。通过单变量和多变量二元逻辑回归分析危险因素和短期终点的差异。通过Kaplan-Meier、单变量和多变量Cox回归方法检测OS、RFS和随后的第二次肿瘤发生率。结果:与女性相比,男性乳腺癌患者出现晚期、淋巴浸润、原发性远处转移等不良预后因素的风险明显更高。虽然前哨淋巴结活检和HER-2检测具有可比性,但男性的治疗率比女性低9.5-29.0%。在多变量分析中,男性死亡风险增加1.32倍(95% CI 1.24-1.41;结论:无论是患者和肿瘤的特征还是治疗的差异都不能完全解释男女死亡率的差异。生活方式或生物因素的差异可能会发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical, therapeutic and prognostic differences between male and female patients with breast cancer-a comparison of 2510 men and 307,634 women in a registry-based study in Germany.

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to compare patient, tumor characteristics and prognostic factors as well as diagnostics and therapies between men and women with breast cancer. The rates of primary distant metastases, contralateral second tumors, overall survival (OS), recurrence, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed and compared between men and women.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patient data from 18 clinical cancer registries in Germany (2000-2018). Differences in risk factors and short-term endpoints were analyzed via univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses. OS, RFS, and the rate of subsequent second tumors were examined via Kaplan‒Meier, univariable and multivariable Cox regression methods.

Results: Compared with women, male patients with breast cancer presented a significantly greater risk of unfavorable prognostic factors, such as advanced stage, lymphatic invasion, and more primary distant metastases. While sentinel lymph node biopsy and HER-2 testing were comparable, treatment rates for men were 9.5-29.0% lower than those for women. In multivariable analyses, men had a 1.32-fold increased risk of death (95% CI 1.24-1.41; p < 0.001). The risk of recurrence/mortality was significantly increased by a factor of 1.531 (95% CI 1.43-1.65; p < 0.001). Adjustment for therapy in a multivariable regression model did not significantly affect the risk of death. Nevertheless, men had a survival benefit from systemic therapies comparable to that of women.

Conclusion: Neither patient and tumor characteristics nor differences in therapy could completely explain the difference in mortality between men and women. Differences in lifestyle or biological factors could play a role.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信