日本骨肉瘤:2006-2022年骨和软组织肿瘤登记报告。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Koichi Ogura, Hirotaka Kawano, Shoji Shimose, Koji Hiraoka, Akihiko Matsumine, Akira Kawai
{"title":"日本骨肉瘤:2006-2022年骨和软组织肿瘤登记报告。","authors":"Koichi Ogura, Hirotaka Kawano, Shoji Shimose, Koji Hiraoka, Akihiko Matsumine, Akira Kawai","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor. Although previous studies reported genetic differences between younger and older patients, comprehensive nationwide data remain scarce. This study aimed to describe age-related differences in demographics, treatment, and survival using Japan's Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor (BSTT) Registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 3446 osteosarcoma cases recorded in the BSTT Registry from 2006 to 2022. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes were examined, with a focus on differences across age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort showed a slight male predominance (57%) and bimodal age distribution peaking at 10-19 and 70-79 years. The proportion of patients aged ≥60 years increased from 16% (2006-2012) to 19% (2013-2022). The femur (46%) was the most common tumor site, but spine or pelvis involvement was more frequent in elderly patients. Nodal and distant metastases were more common in older adults (5% vs 2%, and 26% vs 17%, respectively). Patients aged <60 underwent surgery and chemotherapy more often (79% and 83%) compared to those aged ≥60 (61% and 47%). The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 64% overall, but markedly lower in the elderly (40%) than younger patients (70%). Key prognostic factors included histologic grade, metastasis status, tumor size, location, and surgical margins. DSS was slightly worse in recent years, though not statistically significant (P = 0.080).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This nationwide analysis highlights age-associated disparities in osteosarcoma care in Japan. Older patients receive less aggressive treatment and have poorer outcomes. These findings may inform healthcare planning in aging societies globally.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic studies, Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1046-1053"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteosarcoma in Japan: report from the bone and soft tissue tumor registry 2006-2022.\",\"authors\":\"Koichi Ogura, Hirotaka Kawano, Shoji Shimose, Koji Hiraoka, Akihiko Matsumine, Akira Kawai\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jjco/hyaf094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor. Although previous studies reported genetic differences between younger and older patients, comprehensive nationwide data remain scarce. This study aimed to describe age-related differences in demographics, treatment, and survival using Japan's Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor (BSTT) Registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 3446 osteosarcoma cases recorded in the BSTT Registry from 2006 to 2022. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes were examined, with a focus on differences across age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort showed a slight male predominance (57%) and bimodal age distribution peaking at 10-19 and 70-79 years. The proportion of patients aged ≥60 years increased from 16% (2006-2012) to 19% (2013-2022). The femur (46%) was the most common tumor site, but spine or pelvis involvement was more frequent in elderly patients. Nodal and distant metastases were more common in older adults (5% vs 2%, and 26% vs 17%, respectively). Patients aged <60 underwent surgery and chemotherapy more often (79% and 83%) compared to those aged ≥60 (61% and 47%). The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 64% overall, but markedly lower in the elderly (40%) than younger patients (70%). Key prognostic factors included histologic grade, metastasis status, tumor size, location, and surgical margins. DSS was slightly worse in recent years, though not statistically significant (P = 0.080).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This nationwide analysis highlights age-associated disparities in osteosarcoma care in Japan. Older patients receive less aggressive treatment and have poorer outcomes. These findings may inform healthcare planning in aging societies globally.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic studies, Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1046-1053\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf094\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨肉瘤是最常见的原发性骨恶性肿瘤。尽管先前的研究报告了年轻和老年患者之间的基因差异,但全面的全国数据仍然很少。本研究旨在利用日本骨和软组织肿瘤(BSTT)登记处描述人口统计学、治疗和生存方面的年龄相关差异。方法:我们回顾性分析了2006年至2022年BSTT登记处记录的3446例骨肉瘤病例。研究了患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征、治疗方式和结果,重点关注了年龄组之间的差异。结果:该队列显示轻微的男性优势(57%),双峰年龄分布在10-19岁和70-79岁达到高峰。年龄≥60岁的患者比例从2006-2012年的16%上升到2013-2022年的19%。股骨(46%)是最常见的肿瘤部位,但累及脊柱或骨盆在老年患者中更为常见。淋巴结和远处转移在老年人中更为常见(分别为5%对2%,26%对17%)。结论:这项全国性的分析强调了日本骨肉瘤治疗中与年龄相关的差异。老年患者接受的积极治疗较少,结果也较差。这些发现可能为全球老龄化社会的医疗保健规划提供信息。证据等级:预后研究,III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Osteosarcoma in Japan: report from the bone and soft tissue tumor registry 2006-2022.

Background: Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor. Although previous studies reported genetic differences between younger and older patients, comprehensive nationwide data remain scarce. This study aimed to describe age-related differences in demographics, treatment, and survival using Japan's Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor (BSTT) Registry.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 3446 osteosarcoma cases recorded in the BSTT Registry from 2006 to 2022. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes were examined, with a focus on differences across age groups.

Results: The cohort showed a slight male predominance (57%) and bimodal age distribution peaking at 10-19 and 70-79 years. The proportion of patients aged ≥60 years increased from 16% (2006-2012) to 19% (2013-2022). The femur (46%) was the most common tumor site, but spine or pelvis involvement was more frequent in elderly patients. Nodal and distant metastases were more common in older adults (5% vs 2%, and 26% vs 17%, respectively). Patients aged <60 underwent surgery and chemotherapy more often (79% and 83%) compared to those aged ≥60 (61% and 47%). The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 64% overall, but markedly lower in the elderly (40%) than younger patients (70%). Key prognostic factors included histologic grade, metastasis status, tumor size, location, and surgical margins. DSS was slightly worse in recent years, though not statistically significant (P = 0.080).

Conclusions: This nationwide analysis highlights age-associated disparities in osteosarcoma care in Japan. Older patients receive less aggressive treatment and have poorer outcomes. These findings may inform healthcare planning in aging societies globally.

Level of evidence: Prognostic studies, Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信