在一项巢式病例对照研究中,较高的生物安全水平与丹麦奶牛农场成为都柏林沙门氏菌测试阳性的风险降低有关。

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Pub Date : 2025-05-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fvets.2025.1566380
Lars Pedersen, Hans Houe, Erik Rattenborg, Liza Rosenbaum Nielsen
{"title":"在一项巢式病例对照研究中,较高的生物安全水平与丹麦奶牛农场成为都柏林沙门氏菌测试阳性的风险降低有关。","authors":"Lars Pedersen, Hans Houe, Erik Rattenborg, Liza Rosenbaum Nielsen","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2025.1566380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Salmonella</i> Dublin (<i>S</i>. Dublin) is a cattle-adapted bacterium with enzootic occurrence in cattle populations of many countries. Preventing the spread of <i>S.</i> Dublin between cattle farms requires an understanding of the local pathways for the direct and indirect transmission of bacteria. Identifying key risk factors is complicated due to the numerous pathways through which the bacteria can be introduced and established on dairy cattle farms. This study aimed to provide new knowledge about the effect of biosecurity in dairy farms in <i>S.</i> Dublin-enzootic areas of Denmark. The association between the researcher-assessed biosecurity level and the risk of introducing and establishing <i>S.</i> Dublin in farms was investigated by following a monthly recalculated cohort of dairy farms with no test-positive <i>S.</i> Dublin surveillance results over the previous 2 years. There were 37 new test-positive farms matched by herd size with 74 control farms that remained test negative in the mandatory <i>S.</i> Dublin surveillance programme. A published Biosecurity Assessment Framework for <i>S.</i> Dublin (BAF-SD) was used to systematically and semi-quantitatively assess the on-farm biosecurity practices across 12 farm sections. Each section was scored on a scale from 0 (total lack of biosecurity measures) to 100 (excellent biosecurity) based on observations and interviews. Lower biosecurity scores in the sections\" entrance area,\" \"pick-up-delivery of calves,\" \"calves < 130 days,\" \"cattle > 130 days,\" and \"storage of feed and feeding\" were associated with becoming test-positive for <i>S</i>. Dublin at a 90% confidence interval (CI) level in univariable logistic analyses. In the multivariable analysis, a higher weighted biosecurity score across all sections was found to be associated with (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with lower odds of becoming test-positive for <i>S.</i> Dublin (odds ratio [OR] = 0.64 per 10-unit increase in biosecurity level). None of the study farms had very good (score 80 to <90) or excellent biosecurity (score of 90 or above), highlighting the opportunities for biosecurity improvements on-farm. In conclusion, the current biosecurity levels in Danish farms appear insufficient to resist the infection pressure of <i>S.</i> Dublin from the farm surroundings. Hence, biosecurity practices need to be improved, and/or the infection pressure needs to be reduced, to lower the number of new test-positive dairy cattle farms in Denmark.</p>","PeriodicalId":12772,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"1566380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12127428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher biosecurity level was associated with reduced risk of Danish dairy cattle farms becoming test-positive for <i>Salmonella</i> Dublin in a nested case-control study.\",\"authors\":\"Lars Pedersen, Hans Houe, Erik Rattenborg, Liza Rosenbaum Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fvets.2025.1566380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Salmonella</i> Dublin (<i>S</i>. Dublin) is a cattle-adapted bacterium with enzootic occurrence in cattle populations of many countries. Preventing the spread of <i>S.</i> Dublin between cattle farms requires an understanding of the local pathways for the direct and indirect transmission of bacteria. Identifying key risk factors is complicated due to the numerous pathways through which the bacteria can be introduced and established on dairy cattle farms. This study aimed to provide new knowledge about the effect of biosecurity in dairy farms in <i>S.</i> Dublin-enzootic areas of Denmark. The association between the researcher-assessed biosecurity level and the risk of introducing and establishing <i>S.</i> Dublin in farms was investigated by following a monthly recalculated cohort of dairy farms with no test-positive <i>S.</i> Dublin surveillance results over the previous 2 years. There were 37 new test-positive farms matched by herd size with 74 control farms that remained test negative in the mandatory <i>S.</i> Dublin surveillance programme. A published Biosecurity Assessment Framework for <i>S.</i> Dublin (BAF-SD) was used to systematically and semi-quantitatively assess the on-farm biosecurity practices across 12 farm sections. Each section was scored on a scale from 0 (total lack of biosecurity measures) to 100 (excellent biosecurity) based on observations and interviews. Lower biosecurity scores in the sections\\\" entrance area,\\\" \\\"pick-up-delivery of calves,\\\" \\\"calves < 130 days,\\\" \\\"cattle > 130 days,\\\" and \\\"storage of feed and feeding\\\" were associated with becoming test-positive for <i>S</i>. Dublin at a 90% confidence interval (CI) level in univariable logistic analyses. In the multivariable analysis, a higher weighted biosecurity score across all sections was found to be associated with (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with lower odds of becoming test-positive for <i>S.</i> Dublin (odds ratio [OR] = 0.64 per 10-unit increase in biosecurity level). None of the study farms had very good (score 80 to <90) or excellent biosecurity (score of 90 or above), highlighting the opportunities for biosecurity improvements on-farm. In conclusion, the current biosecurity levels in Danish farms appear insufficient to resist the infection pressure of <i>S.</i> Dublin from the farm surroundings. Hence, biosecurity practices need to be improved, and/or the infection pressure needs to be reduced, to lower the number of new test-positive dairy cattle farms in Denmark.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Veterinary Science\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1566380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12127428/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Veterinary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1566380\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1566380","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

都柏林沙门氏菌(S. Dublin)是一种适应牛的细菌,在许多国家的牛群中都有地方性流行。防止都柏林沙门氏菌在养牛场之间的传播需要了解当地直接和间接传播细菌的途径。确定关键的风险因素是复杂的,因为细菌可以通过许多途径引入并在奶牛养殖场建立。本研究旨在为丹麦S. dublin - enzoo疫区奶牛场的生物安全效果提供新的认识。研究人员评估的生物安全水平与在农场引入和建立都柏林沙门氏菌的风险之间的关系,通过对过去2 年没有都柏林沙门氏菌检测结果的奶牛场进行月度重新计算队列进行调查。与猪群规模相匹配的37个新检测呈阳性的猪场,74个对照猪场在强制性都柏林S.监测规划中检测呈阴性。采用已发表的都柏林南区生物安全评估框架(BAF-SD)系统和半定量地评估了12个农场区的农场生物安全实践。根据观察和访谈,每个部分的评分范围从0(完全缺乏生物安全措施)到100(优秀的生物安全措施)。在单变量logistic分析中,在“入口区域”、“犊牛提取-交付”、“犊牛< 130 天”、“犊牛bb0 130 天”和“饲料和饲料储存”等部分,较低的生物安全得分与都柏林沙门氏菌检测呈阳性相关,其置信区间(CI)水平为90%。在多变量分析中,发现所有部分的较高加权生物安全评分与(p S)相关。都柏林(优势比[OR] = 每增加10个单位的生物安全水平0.64)。没有一个被研究的农场在农场环境方面得分很高(80分)。因此,需要改进生物安全措施和/或减少感染压力,以减少丹麦新检测呈阳性的奶牛养殖场的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Higher biosecurity level was associated with reduced risk of Danish dairy cattle farms becoming test-positive for Salmonella Dublin in a nested case-control study.

Salmonella Dublin (S. Dublin) is a cattle-adapted bacterium with enzootic occurrence in cattle populations of many countries. Preventing the spread of S. Dublin between cattle farms requires an understanding of the local pathways for the direct and indirect transmission of bacteria. Identifying key risk factors is complicated due to the numerous pathways through which the bacteria can be introduced and established on dairy cattle farms. This study aimed to provide new knowledge about the effect of biosecurity in dairy farms in S. Dublin-enzootic areas of Denmark. The association between the researcher-assessed biosecurity level and the risk of introducing and establishing S. Dublin in farms was investigated by following a monthly recalculated cohort of dairy farms with no test-positive S. Dublin surveillance results over the previous 2 years. There were 37 new test-positive farms matched by herd size with 74 control farms that remained test negative in the mandatory S. Dublin surveillance programme. A published Biosecurity Assessment Framework for S. Dublin (BAF-SD) was used to systematically and semi-quantitatively assess the on-farm biosecurity practices across 12 farm sections. Each section was scored on a scale from 0 (total lack of biosecurity measures) to 100 (excellent biosecurity) based on observations and interviews. Lower biosecurity scores in the sections" entrance area," "pick-up-delivery of calves," "calves < 130 days," "cattle > 130 days," and "storage of feed and feeding" were associated with becoming test-positive for S. Dublin at a 90% confidence interval (CI) level in univariable logistic analyses. In the multivariable analysis, a higher weighted biosecurity score across all sections was found to be associated with (p < 0.05) with lower odds of becoming test-positive for S. Dublin (odds ratio [OR] = 0.64 per 10-unit increase in biosecurity level). None of the study farms had very good (score 80 to <90) or excellent biosecurity (score of 90 or above), highlighting the opportunities for biosecurity improvements on-farm. In conclusion, the current biosecurity levels in Danish farms appear insufficient to resist the infection pressure of S. Dublin from the farm surroundings. Hence, biosecurity practices need to be improved, and/or the infection pressure needs to be reduced, to lower the number of new test-positive dairy cattle farms in Denmark.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1870
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Veterinary Science is a global, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that bridges animal and human health, brings a comparative approach to medical and surgical challenges, and advances innovative biotechnology and therapy. Veterinary research today is interdisciplinary, collaborative, and socially relevant, transforming how we understand and investigate animal health and disease. Fundamental research in emerging infectious diseases, predictive genomics, stem cell therapy, and translational modelling is grounded within the integrative social context of public and environmental health, wildlife conservation, novel biomarkers, societal well-being, and cutting-edge clinical practice and specialization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science brings a 21st-century approach—networked, collaborative, and Open Access—to communicate this progress and innovation to both the specialist and to the wider audience of readers in the field. Frontiers in Veterinary Science publishes articles on outstanding discoveries across a wide spectrum of translational, foundational, and clinical research. The journal''s mission is to bring all relevant veterinary sciences together on a single platform with the goal of improving animal and human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信