大剂量埃索美拉唑作为脓毒症抗炎剂的多国随机试验。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006720
Giacomo Monti, Sonia Carta, Yuki Kotani, Andrea Bruni, Maiya Konkayeva, Fabio Guarracino, Aleksey Yakovlev, Giada Cucciolini, Maria Shemetova, Sara Scapol, Elena Momesso, Eugenio Garofalo, Giulia Brizzi, Rubia Baldassarri, Silvia Ajello, Alessandro Isirdi, Francesco Meroi, Martina Baiardo Redaelli, Nicoletta Boffa, Carmine Domenico Votta, Giovanni Borghi, Giorgia Montrucchio, Simon Rauch, Filippo D'Amico, Maria Caterina Pace, Gianluca Paternoster, Francesca Vitale, Giuseppe Giardina, Rosa Labanca, Rosalba Lembo, Marilena Marmiere, Matteo Marzaroli, Cristina Nakhnoukh, Valentina Plumari, Anna Mara Scandroglio, Tommaso Scquizzato, Stella Sordoni, Davide Valsecchi, Felice Eugenio Agrò, Gabriele Finco, Tiziana Bove, Francesco Corradi, Valery Likhvantsev, Federico Longhini, Aidos Konkayev, Giovanni Landoni, Rinaldo Bellomo, Alberto Zangrillo
{"title":"大剂量埃索美拉唑作为脓毒症抗炎剂的多国随机试验。","authors":"Giacomo Monti, Sonia Carta, Yuki Kotani, Andrea Bruni, Maiya Konkayeva, Fabio Guarracino, Aleksey Yakovlev, Giada Cucciolini, Maria Shemetova, Sara Scapol, Elena Momesso, Eugenio Garofalo, Giulia Brizzi, Rubia Baldassarri, Silvia Ajello, Alessandro Isirdi, Francesco Meroi, Martina Baiardo Redaelli, Nicoletta Boffa, Carmine Domenico Votta, Giovanni Borghi, Giorgia Montrucchio, Simon Rauch, Filippo D'Amico, Maria Caterina Pace, Gianluca Paternoster, Francesca Vitale, Giuseppe Giardina, Rosa Labanca, Rosalba Lembo, Marilena Marmiere, Matteo Marzaroli, Cristina Nakhnoukh, Valentina Plumari, Anna Mara Scandroglio, Tommaso Scquizzato, Stella Sordoni, Davide Valsecchi, Felice Eugenio Agrò, Gabriele Finco, Tiziana Bove, Francesco Corradi, Valery Likhvantsev, Federico Longhini, Aidos Konkayev, Giovanni Landoni, Rinaldo Bellomo, Alberto Zangrillo","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Proton pump inhibitors have dose-dependent immunomodulatory effects. We tested the hypothesis that mega-dose esomeprazole therapy would reduce organ dysfunction in patients with sepsis or septic shock.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seventeen ICUs or emergency departments in three countries.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients with sepsis or septic shock.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Mega-dose (1024 mg) esomeprazole or placebo over a 72-hour period.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was mean daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score to day 10. Secondary outcomes included antibiotics-free days, ICU-free days at day 28, and all-cause mortality. We also conducted a mechanistic study of the in vitro effects of esomeprazole in sepsis. We randomized 307 patients and assigned 148 to esomeprazole and 159 to placebo. Mean age was 71 years; 166 patients (54%) had septic shock and median SOFA score at randomization was 7. The median mean daily SOFA score in the first 10 days post-randomization was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 3-9) in the esomeprazole group and 5 (IQR, 3-8) in the placebo group (risk difference, 0.1; 95% CI, -0.8 to 1.0; p > 0.99). No differences were observed in secondary outcomes. Monocytes isolated from patients' peripheral blood and activated with a toll-like receptor agonist exhibited a pro-inflammatory phenotype, which was not affected by esomeprazole therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with sepsis or septic shock, mega-dose esomeprazole did not reduce organ dysfunction or other patient-related or biological secondary outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e1554-e1566"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multinational Randomized Trial of Mega-Dose Esomeprazole as Anti-Inflammatory Agent in Sepsis.\",\"authors\":\"Giacomo Monti, Sonia Carta, Yuki Kotani, Andrea Bruni, Maiya Konkayeva, Fabio Guarracino, Aleksey Yakovlev, Giada Cucciolini, Maria Shemetova, Sara Scapol, Elena Momesso, Eugenio Garofalo, Giulia Brizzi, Rubia Baldassarri, Silvia Ajello, Alessandro Isirdi, Francesco Meroi, Martina Baiardo Redaelli, Nicoletta Boffa, Carmine Domenico Votta, Giovanni Borghi, Giorgia Montrucchio, Simon Rauch, Filippo D'Amico, Maria Caterina Pace, Gianluca Paternoster, Francesca Vitale, Giuseppe Giardina, Rosa Labanca, Rosalba Lembo, Marilena Marmiere, Matteo Marzaroli, Cristina Nakhnoukh, Valentina Plumari, Anna Mara Scandroglio, Tommaso Scquizzato, Stella Sordoni, Davide Valsecchi, Felice Eugenio Agrò, Gabriele Finco, Tiziana Bove, Francesco Corradi, Valery Likhvantsev, Federico Longhini, Aidos Konkayev, Giovanni Landoni, Rinaldo Bellomo, Alberto Zangrillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Proton pump inhibitors have dose-dependent immunomodulatory effects. We tested the hypothesis that mega-dose esomeprazole therapy would reduce organ dysfunction in patients with sepsis or septic shock.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seventeen ICUs or emergency departments in three countries.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients with sepsis or septic shock.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Mega-dose (1024 mg) esomeprazole or placebo over a 72-hour period.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was mean daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score to day 10. Secondary outcomes included antibiotics-free days, ICU-free days at day 28, and all-cause mortality. We also conducted a mechanistic study of the in vitro effects of esomeprazole in sepsis. We randomized 307 patients and assigned 148 to esomeprazole and 159 to placebo. Mean age was 71 years; 166 patients (54%) had septic shock and median SOFA score at randomization was 7. The median mean daily SOFA score in the first 10 days post-randomization was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 3-9) in the esomeprazole group and 5 (IQR, 3-8) in the placebo group (risk difference, 0.1; 95% CI, -0.8 to 1.0; p > 0.99). No differences were observed in secondary outcomes. Monocytes isolated from patients' peripheral blood and activated with a toll-like receptor agonist exhibited a pro-inflammatory phenotype, which was not affected by esomeprazole therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with sepsis or septic shock, mega-dose esomeprazole did not reduce organ dysfunction or other patient-related or biological secondary outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1554-e1566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006720\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006720","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:质子泵抑制剂具有剂量依赖性免疫调节作用。我们检验了大剂量埃索美拉唑治疗可以减轻脓毒症或感染性休克患者器官功能障碍的假设。设计:多国、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。环境:三个国家的17个icu或急诊科。患者:脓毒症或感染性休克的成年患者。干预措施:大剂量(1024mg)埃索美拉唑或安慰剂72小时。测量和主要结果:主要结果是第10天的平均每日顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。次要结局包括无抗生素天数、第28天无icu天数和全因死亡率。我们还对埃索美拉唑在脓毒症中的体外作用进行了机制研究。我们随机选取307例患者,其中148例使用埃索美拉唑,159例使用安慰剂。平均年龄71岁;166例患者(54%)发生脓毒性休克,随机分组时SOFA评分中位数为7分。随机分组后前10天,埃索美拉唑组每日平均SOFA评分中位数为5分(四分位间距[IQR], 3-9),安慰剂组为5分(四分位间距[IQR], 3-8)(风险差为0.1;95% CI, -0.8 ~ 1.0;P < 0.99)。在次要结局方面没有观察到差异。从患者外周血中分离出来的单核细胞,用toll样受体激动剂激活,表现出促炎表型,而埃索美拉唑治疗不影响这一表型。结论:在脓毒症或感染性休克患者中,大剂量埃索美拉唑并没有减少器官功能障碍或其他与患者相关的或生物学的次要结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Multinational Randomized Trial of Mega-Dose Esomeprazole as Anti-Inflammatory Agent in Sepsis.

Objectives: Proton pump inhibitors have dose-dependent immunomodulatory effects. We tested the hypothesis that mega-dose esomeprazole therapy would reduce organ dysfunction in patients with sepsis or septic shock.

Design: A multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Setting: Seventeen ICUs or emergency departments in three countries.

Patients: Adult patients with sepsis or septic shock.

Interventions: Mega-dose (1024 mg) esomeprazole or placebo over a 72-hour period.

Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was mean daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score to day 10. Secondary outcomes included antibiotics-free days, ICU-free days at day 28, and all-cause mortality. We also conducted a mechanistic study of the in vitro effects of esomeprazole in sepsis. We randomized 307 patients and assigned 148 to esomeprazole and 159 to placebo. Mean age was 71 years; 166 patients (54%) had septic shock and median SOFA score at randomization was 7. The median mean daily SOFA score in the first 10 days post-randomization was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 3-9) in the esomeprazole group and 5 (IQR, 3-8) in the placebo group (risk difference, 0.1; 95% CI, -0.8 to 1.0; p > 0.99). No differences were observed in secondary outcomes. Monocytes isolated from patients' peripheral blood and activated with a toll-like receptor agonist exhibited a pro-inflammatory phenotype, which was not affected by esomeprazole therapy.

Conclusions: Among patients with sepsis or septic shock, mega-dose esomeprazole did not reduce organ dysfunction or other patient-related or biological secondary outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信