对20例接受Latarjet手术的患者进行为期一年的随访:在放射立体测量法测量的感知-移位试验期间的生物力学研究。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Josephine Olsen Kipp, Emil Toft Petersen, Maiken Stilling, Sepp De Raedt, Anna Zejden, Rikke Jellesen Åberg, Thomas Falstie-Jensen, Theis Muncholm Thillemann
{"title":"对20例接受Latarjet手术的患者进行为期一年的随访:在放射立体测量法测量的感知-移位试验期间的生物力学研究。","authors":"Josephine Olsen Kipp, Emil Toft Petersen, Maiken Stilling, Sepp De Raedt, Anna Zejden, Rikke Jellesen Åberg, Thomas Falstie-Jensen, Theis Muncholm Thillemann","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.146.BJR-2024-0533.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Latarjet procedure is the treatment of choice for patients who have recurrent anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss. However, the stabilizing effect of the Latarjet procedure in patients is sparsely described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the glenohumeral joint (GHJ) kinematics during an apprehension-relocation test in patients with anterior shoulder instability before and after their Latarjet procedure, and in comparison with their contralateral healthy shoulder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 20 patients scheduled for the Latarjet procedure were enrolled. The patients were examined preoperatively with bilateral radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and one year after surgery on the operated shoulder with an apprehension-relocation test. Bone models were obtained from CT scans and aligned with the RSA images. The GHJ kinematics was evaluated with two methods: the humeral head centre location relative to the glenoid centre, and the GHJ contact point relative to the glenoid centre.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No difference in GHJ kinematics was found between the healthy and the postoperative GHJ. Compared with the preoperative injured shoulder, the postoperative mean (95% CI) humeral head centre was 0.8 mm (0.1 to 1.4) more superior and 0.7 mm (-0.1. to 1.4) more posterior during the apprehension test, and 0.5 mm (0.0 to 1.1) more posterior during the relocation test. The postoperative contact point was posterior to the coracoid bone block and 0.9 mm (-0.2 to 2.0) more posterior than in the preoperative injured shoulder during the apprehension test. The articulating area of the coracoid bone block was decreased by 63.9% (75.5 to 114.6) one year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Latarjet procedure restored the humeral head centre location posterior and superior, and the contact point posterior, to the coracoid bone block. This suggests that the stabilizing effect of the GHJ following the Latarjet procedure is primarily due to the conjoined tendon rather than the coracoid bone block itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":9074,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Research","volume":"14 6","pages":"506-515"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-year follow-up of 20 patients undergoing the Latarjet procedure : a biomechanical study during an apprehension-relocation test measured with radiostereometry.\",\"authors\":\"Josephine Olsen Kipp, Emil Toft Petersen, Maiken Stilling, Sepp De Raedt, Anna Zejden, Rikke Jellesen Åberg, Thomas Falstie-Jensen, Theis Muncholm Thillemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2046-3758.146.BJR-2024-0533.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Latarjet procedure is the treatment of choice for patients who have recurrent anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss. However, the stabilizing effect of the Latarjet procedure in patients is sparsely described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the glenohumeral joint (GHJ) kinematics during an apprehension-relocation test in patients with anterior shoulder instability before and after their Latarjet procedure, and in comparison with their contralateral healthy shoulder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 20 patients scheduled for the Latarjet procedure were enrolled. The patients were examined preoperatively with bilateral radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and one year after surgery on the operated shoulder with an apprehension-relocation test. Bone models were obtained from CT scans and aligned with the RSA images. The GHJ kinematics was evaluated with two methods: the humeral head centre location relative to the glenoid centre, and the GHJ contact point relative to the glenoid centre.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No difference in GHJ kinematics was found between the healthy and the postoperative GHJ. Compared with the preoperative injured shoulder, the postoperative mean (95% CI) humeral head centre was 0.8 mm (0.1 to 1.4) more superior and 0.7 mm (-0.1. to 1.4) more posterior during the apprehension test, and 0.5 mm (0.0 to 1.1) more posterior during the relocation test. The postoperative contact point was posterior to the coracoid bone block and 0.9 mm (-0.2 to 2.0) more posterior than in the preoperative injured shoulder during the apprehension test. The articulating area of the coracoid bone block was decreased by 63.9% (75.5 to 114.6) one year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Latarjet procedure restored the humeral head centre location posterior and superior, and the contact point posterior, to the coracoid bone block. This suggests that the stabilizing effect of the GHJ following the Latarjet procedure is primarily due to the conjoined tendon rather than the coracoid bone block itself.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Research\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"506-515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130908/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.146.BJR-2024-0533.R1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.146.BJR-2024-0533.R1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Latarjet手术是复发性肩前路不稳伴肩关节骨丢失患者的首选治疗方法。然而,Latarjet手术对患者的稳定作用却鲜有报道。本研究的目的是评估前侧肩关节不稳定患者在Latarjet手术前后的移动-移位测试中的肩关节(GHJ)运动学,并与对侧健康肩关节进行比较。方法:共纳入20例计划进行Latarjet手术的患者。术前对患者进行双侧放射立体分析(RSA)检查,术后一年对手术肩部进行忧虑-定位测试。从CT扫描中获得骨模型,并与RSA图像对齐。采用两种方法评估GHJ的运动学:肱骨头中心相对于关节盂中心的位置和GHJ接触点相对于关节盂中心的位置。结果:正常和术后GHJ的运动学无差异。与术前肩关节损伤相比,术后肱骨头中心平均(95% CI)增加0.8 mm (0.1 ~ 1.4), 0.7 mm(-0.1)。在理解测试中后移1.4毫米,在定位测试中后移0.5毫米(0.0至1.1毫米)。术后接触点位于喙骨块后方,比术前受伤肩后0.9 mm(-0.2 ~ 2.0)。术后1年喙骨块的关节面积减少63.9%(75.5 ~ 114.6)。结论:Latarjet手术恢复肱骨头中心位置后上,接触点后向喙骨块。这表明Latarjet手术后GHJ的稳定作用主要是由于连体肌腱而不是喙骨块本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One-year follow-up of 20 patients undergoing the Latarjet procedure : a biomechanical study during an apprehension-relocation test measured with radiostereometry.

Aims: The Latarjet procedure is the treatment of choice for patients who have recurrent anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss. However, the stabilizing effect of the Latarjet procedure in patients is sparsely described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the glenohumeral joint (GHJ) kinematics during an apprehension-relocation test in patients with anterior shoulder instability before and after their Latarjet procedure, and in comparison with their contralateral healthy shoulder.

Methods: A total of 20 patients scheduled for the Latarjet procedure were enrolled. The patients were examined preoperatively with bilateral radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and one year after surgery on the operated shoulder with an apprehension-relocation test. Bone models were obtained from CT scans and aligned with the RSA images. The GHJ kinematics was evaluated with two methods: the humeral head centre location relative to the glenoid centre, and the GHJ contact point relative to the glenoid centre.

Results: No difference in GHJ kinematics was found between the healthy and the postoperative GHJ. Compared with the preoperative injured shoulder, the postoperative mean (95% CI) humeral head centre was 0.8 mm (0.1 to 1.4) more superior and 0.7 mm (-0.1. to 1.4) more posterior during the apprehension test, and 0.5 mm (0.0 to 1.1) more posterior during the relocation test. The postoperative contact point was posterior to the coracoid bone block and 0.9 mm (-0.2 to 2.0) more posterior than in the preoperative injured shoulder during the apprehension test. The articulating area of the coracoid bone block was decreased by 63.9% (75.5 to 114.6) one year after surgery.

Conclusion: The Latarjet procedure restored the humeral head centre location posterior and superior, and the contact point posterior, to the coracoid bone block. This suggests that the stabilizing effect of the GHJ following the Latarjet procedure is primarily due to the conjoined tendon rather than the coracoid bone block itself.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Research
Bone & Joint Research CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
23.90%
发文量
156
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The gold open access journal for the musculoskeletal sciences. Included in PubMed and available in PubMed Central.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信