{"title":"瑞德西韦治疗严重肾功能损害合并冠状病毒患者的安全性评价:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Takumi Umemura, Hideo Kato, Yoshikazu Mutoh, Mao Hagihara, Yoshiaki Ikeda, Hiroshige Mikamo","doi":"10.1186/s12879-025-11153-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether remdesivir (RDV) is safe for patients with severe renal impairment (SRI) and COVID-19, compared to non-SRI patients or those not receiving RDV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We searched PubMed, Cohcrane, CINAHL, and Ichushi databases up to October 11, 2024. The outcomes assessed kidney injury, hepatic disorder and mortality. Randomized controlled trials and retrospective and cohort studies reporting kidney injury, hepatotoxicity, and mortality in (i) SRI patients treated with RDV versus without RDV or (ii) SRI patients versus non-SRI patients treated with RDV were included. Targeted patients were defined as adults with COVID-19 based on a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction or rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal or salivary swabs regardless of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One randomized controlled trial and 14 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final meta-analysis. Among SRI patients, RDV significantly reduced the incidence of kidney injury (risk ratio [RR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.27-0.97) but had no significant difference in the development of hepatic disorder (RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.39-1.98) and mortality (RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.55-1.15). In the comparison between SRI and non-SRI patients treated with RDV, SRI patients demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of kidney injury (odds ratio [OR] = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.49-4.23), with no significant difference in the development of hepatic disorder (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.43-2.53). Meanwhile, SRI patients treated with RDV exhibited significantly higher mortality than non-SRI patients treated with RDV (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.51-3.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our meta-analysis demonstrated that RDV administration in SRI patients with COVID-19 was safe compared to non-SRI or SRI patient treated without RDV. We suggest that the use of RDV should be actively considered for SRI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"782"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety evaluation of remdesivir administration in patients with severe renal impairment and coronavirus disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Takumi Umemura, Hideo Kato, Yoshikazu Mutoh, Mao Hagihara, Yoshiaki Ikeda, Hiroshige Mikamo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12879-025-11153-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether remdesivir (RDV) is safe for patients with severe renal impairment (SRI) and COVID-19, compared to non-SRI patients or those not receiving RDV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We searched PubMed, Cohcrane, CINAHL, and Ichushi databases up to October 11, 2024. The outcomes assessed kidney injury, hepatic disorder and mortality. Randomized controlled trials and retrospective and cohort studies reporting kidney injury, hepatotoxicity, and mortality in (i) SRI patients treated with RDV versus without RDV or (ii) SRI patients versus non-SRI patients treated with RDV were included. Targeted patients were defined as adults with COVID-19 based on a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction or rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal or salivary swabs regardless of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One randomized controlled trial and 14 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final meta-analysis. Among SRI patients, RDV significantly reduced the incidence of kidney injury (risk ratio [RR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.27-0.97) but had no significant difference in the development of hepatic disorder (RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.39-1.98) and mortality (RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.55-1.15). In the comparison between SRI and non-SRI patients treated with RDV, SRI patients demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of kidney injury (odds ratio [OR] = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.49-4.23), with no significant difference in the development of hepatic disorder (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.43-2.53). Meanwhile, SRI patients treated with RDV exhibited significantly higher mortality than non-SRI patients treated with RDV (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.51-3.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our meta-analysis demonstrated that RDV administration in SRI patients with COVID-19 was safe compared to non-SRI or SRI patient treated without RDV. We suggest that the use of RDV should be actively considered for SRI patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"782\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128546/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11153-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11153-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:我们进行了一项全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估与非SRI患者或未接受RDV的患者相比,remdesivir (RDV)对严重肾损害(SRI)和COVID-19患者是否安全。方法:本研究按照PRISMA报告系统评价和荟萃分析指南进行。我们检索了PubMed、Cohcrane、CINAHL和Ichushi数据库,截止到2024年10月11日。结果评估了肾损伤、肝脏紊乱和死亡率。纳入了随机对照试验、回顾性和队列研究,报告了(i)接受RDV治疗的SRI患者与未接受RDV治疗的SRI患者或(ii)接受RDV治疗的SRI患者与非SRI患者的肾损伤、肝毒性和死亡率。无论症状如何,根据鼻咽或唾液拭子中SARS-CoV-2逆转录聚合酶链反应阳性或快速抗原检测阳性,将目标患者定义为成人COVID-19患者。结果:1项随机对照试验和14项队列研究符合纳入标准,并被纳入最终的荟萃分析。在SRI患者中,RDV显著降低了肾损伤的发生率(风险比[RR] = 0.51, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.27-0.97),但在肝功能障碍的发生(RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.39-1.98)和死亡率(RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.55-1.15)方面无显著差异。在接受RDV治疗的SRI患者与非SRI患者的比较中,SRI患者的肾损伤发生率明显更高(优势比[OR] = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.49-4.23),而肝脏疾病的发生无显著差异(OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.43-2.53)。同时,接受RDV治疗的SRI患者的死亡率显著高于非SRI患者(OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.51-3.22)。结论:我们的荟萃分析表明,与非SRI或未接受RDV治疗的SRI患者相比,SRI患者的COVID-19患者给予RDV治疗是安全的。我们建议应积极考虑对SRI患者使用RDV。
Safety evaluation of remdesivir administration in patients with severe renal impairment and coronavirus disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether remdesivir (RDV) is safe for patients with severe renal impairment (SRI) and COVID-19, compared to non-SRI patients or those not receiving RDV.
Methods: This study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We searched PubMed, Cohcrane, CINAHL, and Ichushi databases up to October 11, 2024. The outcomes assessed kidney injury, hepatic disorder and mortality. Randomized controlled trials and retrospective and cohort studies reporting kidney injury, hepatotoxicity, and mortality in (i) SRI patients treated with RDV versus without RDV or (ii) SRI patients versus non-SRI patients treated with RDV were included. Targeted patients were defined as adults with COVID-19 based on a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction or rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal or salivary swabs regardless of symptoms.
Results: One randomized controlled trial and 14 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final meta-analysis. Among SRI patients, RDV significantly reduced the incidence of kidney injury (risk ratio [RR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.27-0.97) but had no significant difference in the development of hepatic disorder (RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.39-1.98) and mortality (RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.55-1.15). In the comparison between SRI and non-SRI patients treated with RDV, SRI patients demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of kidney injury (odds ratio [OR] = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.49-4.23), with no significant difference in the development of hepatic disorder (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.43-2.53). Meanwhile, SRI patients treated with RDV exhibited significantly higher mortality than non-SRI patients treated with RDV (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.51-3.22).
Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that RDV administration in SRI patients with COVID-19 was safe compared to non-SRI or SRI patient treated without RDV. We suggest that the use of RDV should be actively considered for SRI patients.
期刊介绍:
BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.