日常记忆和元认知干预:随机对照试验。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Christopher Hertzog, Mackenzie L Hughes, Emily L Giannotto, Clara W Coblenz, Ethan Flurry, Taylor Curley, Ann Pearman
{"title":"日常记忆和元认知干预:随机对照试验。","authors":"Christopher Hertzog, Mackenzie L Hughes, Emily L Giannotto, Clara W Coblenz, Ethan Flurry, Taylor Curley, Ann Pearman","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2025.2513413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated whether the Everyday Memory and Metacognitive Intervention (EMMI) improved everyday memory functioning and subjective memory among older adults. The EMMI uses a metacognitive approach to link awareness of situational cognitive demands to the selection and use of strategies to bypass cognitive constraints and to successfully achieve everyday goals. The randomized controlled trial randomly assigned participants to the EMMI group or an active control group trained in mnemonic strategies for word list memorization. We used an event-based ecological momentary assessment smartphone application to assess self-reported everyday memory failures during everyday life. We also evaluated group differences in pretest to posttest change on objective and subjective measures of memory. An intent-to-treat analysis of the 78 persons randomly assigned to conditions revealed no difference in measures assessed prior to the intervention. The final sample consisted of 30 EMMI participants (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 75.83, <i>SD</i> = 4.68) and 32 control group participants (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 74.94, <i>SD</i> = 4.38). There were no differences between the groups on everyday memory failures and prospective memory. Both groups showed significant increases in aspects of subjective memory ability from pretest to posttest, with the EMMI group producing greater improvements in memory self-efficacy. The control group differentially improved in associative memory after memory-strategy training. Although EMMI did not show the predicted everyday memory improvements, it still has potential to improve people's everyday functioning by way of improving subjective experiences. Post-pandemic enhancements to the intervention could lead to demonstrable everyday memory successes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7532,"journal":{"name":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Everyday memory and metacognitive intervention: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Hertzog, Mackenzie L Hughes, Emily L Giannotto, Clara W Coblenz, Ethan Flurry, Taylor Curley, Ann Pearman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13825585.2025.2513413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated whether the Everyday Memory and Metacognitive Intervention (EMMI) improved everyday memory functioning and subjective memory among older adults. The EMMI uses a metacognitive approach to link awareness of situational cognitive demands to the selection and use of strategies to bypass cognitive constraints and to successfully achieve everyday goals. The randomized controlled trial randomly assigned participants to the EMMI group or an active control group trained in mnemonic strategies for word list memorization. We used an event-based ecological momentary assessment smartphone application to assess self-reported everyday memory failures during everyday life. We also evaluated group differences in pretest to posttest change on objective and subjective measures of memory. An intent-to-treat analysis of the 78 persons randomly assigned to conditions revealed no difference in measures assessed prior to the intervention. The final sample consisted of 30 EMMI participants (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 75.83, <i>SD</i> = 4.68) and 32 control group participants (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 74.94, <i>SD</i> = 4.38). There were no differences between the groups on everyday memory failures and prospective memory. Both groups showed significant increases in aspects of subjective memory ability from pretest to posttest, with the EMMI group producing greater improvements in memory self-efficacy. The control group differentially improved in associative memory after memory-strategy training. Although EMMI did not show the predicted everyday memory improvements, it still has potential to improve people's everyday functioning by way of improving subjective experiences. Post-pandemic enhancements to the intervention could lead to demonstrable everyday memory successes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2025.2513413\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2025.2513413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了日常记忆和元认知干预(EMMI)是否改善了老年人的日常记忆功能和主观记忆。EMMI使用元认知方法将情境认知需求的意识与策略的选择和使用联系起来,以绕过认知约束并成功实现日常目标。随机对照试验将参与者随机分配到EMMI组或一个接受过单词表记忆助记策略训练的积极对照组。我们使用基于事件的生态瞬间评估智能手机应用程序来评估日常生活中自我报告的日常记忆失败。我们还评估了各组在客观和主观记忆测量的测试前和测试后变化方面的差异。对随机分配到不同条件的78人的意向治疗分析显示,干预前评估的措施没有差异。最终样本包括30名EMMI参与者(Mage = 75.83, SD = 4.68)和32名对照组参与者(Mage = 74.94, SD = 4.38)。两组在日常记忆失败和前瞻记忆方面没有差异。从测试前到测试后,两组的主观记忆能力都有显著提高,EMMI组在记忆自我效能方面有更大的提高。经记忆策略训练后,对照组在联想记忆方面有显著改善。虽然EMMI没有显示出预期的日常记忆改善,但它仍然有可能通过改善主观体验来改善人们的日常功能。大流行后对干预措施的加强可能导致明显的日常记忆成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Everyday memory and metacognitive intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

This study evaluated whether the Everyday Memory and Metacognitive Intervention (EMMI) improved everyday memory functioning and subjective memory among older adults. The EMMI uses a metacognitive approach to link awareness of situational cognitive demands to the selection and use of strategies to bypass cognitive constraints and to successfully achieve everyday goals. The randomized controlled trial randomly assigned participants to the EMMI group or an active control group trained in mnemonic strategies for word list memorization. We used an event-based ecological momentary assessment smartphone application to assess self-reported everyday memory failures during everyday life. We also evaluated group differences in pretest to posttest change on objective and subjective measures of memory. An intent-to-treat analysis of the 78 persons randomly assigned to conditions revealed no difference in measures assessed prior to the intervention. The final sample consisted of 30 EMMI participants (Mage = 75.83, SD = 4.68) and 32 control group participants (Mage = 74.94, SD = 4.38). There were no differences between the groups on everyday memory failures and prospective memory. Both groups showed significant increases in aspects of subjective memory ability from pretest to posttest, with the EMMI group producing greater improvements in memory self-efficacy. The control group differentially improved in associative memory after memory-strategy training. Although EMMI did not show the predicted everyday memory improvements, it still has potential to improve people's everyday functioning by way of improving subjective experiences. Post-pandemic enhancements to the intervention could lead to demonstrable everyday memory successes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The purposes of Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition are to (a) publish research on both the normal and dysfunctional aspects of cognitive development in adulthood and aging, and (b) promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings between the fields of cognitive gerontology and neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of the journal is to publish original empirical research. Occasionally, theoretical or methodological papers, critical reviews of a content area, or theoretically relevant case studies will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信