{"title":"在普通人群中,血管僵硬而不是冠状动脉钙化与高血压风险有显著关联。","authors":"Chia-Ter Chao, Min-Tser Liao, Chung-Kuan Wu","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpaf096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension (HTN) significantly increases cardiovascular risk worldwide, and its incidence is expected to rise further over time. Both coronary artery calcification (CAC) and vascular stiffness (VS) potentially contribute to hypertension, but whether CAC and VS jointly aggravates the risk of hypertension remains under-explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assembled a cohort of individuals with low cardiovascular risk. Coronary computed tomography and pulse wave velocity test were used to measure CAC and VS, respectively. Subsequently, we conducted multiple logistic regression to investigate risk factors for having hypertension, incorporating CAC or VS statuses adjusting for demographics, anthropometric indices, laboratory, and echocardiographic parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 321 community-dwelling individuals (55 ± 11 years; 73.21% male) were included. Unadjusted analyses showed that participants with CAC (odds ratio (OR) 2.331, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-3.84) or VS (OR 15.701, 95% CI 4.77-51.58) had significantly higher hypertension risk, whereas multivariate adjustment negated the relationship between CAC and hypertension (OR 1.149, 95% CI 0.55-2.38) but not that between VS and hypertension (OR 12.950, 95% CI 2.87-58.31). Analyses incorporating CAC and VS simultaneously showed that only VS independently correlated with hypertension risk but not CAC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VS plays a more important role in affecting hypertension risk compared with CAC in general population. We suggest that targeting VS would be a more appropriate strategy for mitigating incident hypertension compared with treating CAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"797-805"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vascular Stiffness, Instead of Coronary Artery Calcification, Exhibits Significant Association With Hypertension Risk in General Population.\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Ter Chao, Min-Tser Liao, Chung-Kuan Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajh/hpaf096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension (HTN) significantly increases cardiovascular risk worldwide, and its incidence is expected to rise further over time. Both coronary artery calcification (CAC) and vascular stiffness (VS) potentially contribute to hypertension, but whether CAC and VS jointly aggravates the risk of hypertension remains under-explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assembled a cohort of individuals with low cardiovascular risk. Coronary computed tomography and pulse wave velocity test were used to measure CAC and VS, respectively. Subsequently, we conducted multiple logistic regression to investigate risk factors for having hypertension, incorporating CAC or VS statuses adjusting for demographics, anthropometric indices, laboratory, and echocardiographic parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 321 community-dwelling individuals (55 ± 11 years; 73.21% male) were included. Unadjusted analyses showed that participants with CAC (odds ratio (OR) 2.331, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-3.84) or VS (OR 15.701, 95% CI 4.77-51.58) had significantly higher hypertension risk, whereas multivariate adjustment negated the relationship between CAC and hypertension (OR 1.149, 95% CI 0.55-2.38) but not that between VS and hypertension (OR 12.950, 95% CI 2.87-58.31). Analyses incorporating CAC and VS simultaneously showed that only VS independently correlated with hypertension risk but not CAC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VS plays a more important role in affecting hypertension risk compared with CAC in general population. We suggest that targeting VS would be a more appropriate strategy for mitigating incident hypertension compared with treating CAC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"797-805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf096\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:高血压(HTN)在全球范围内显著增加心血管风险,其发病率预计将随着时间的推移进一步上升。冠状动脉钙化(CAC)和血管僵硬(VS)都可能导致高血压,但CAC和VS是否会共同加重高血压的风险尚不清楚。方法:我们回顾性地收集了一组低心血管风险个体。冠状动脉计算机断层扫描和脉搏波速度试验分别测量CAC和VS。随后,我们进行了多重逻辑回归来调查高血压的危险因素,包括调整人口统计学、人体测量指数、实验室和超声心动图参数的CAC或VS状态。结果:共有321名社区居民(55±11岁);73.21%为男性)。未经调整的分析显示,患有CAC(优势比(OR) 2.331, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.41-3.84)或VS (OR 15.701, 95% CI 4.77-51.58)的受试者有明显更高的高血压风险,而多因素调整否定了CAC和高血压之间的关系(OR 1.149, 95% CI 0.55-2.38),但没有否定VS和高血压之间的关系(OR 12.950, 95% CI 2.87-58.31)。同时纳入CAC和VS的分析显示,只有VS与高血压风险独立相关,而与CAC无关。结论:VS在普通人群中对高血压风险的影响比CAC更重要。我们认为,与治疗CAC相比,靶向VS可能是缓解高血压事件的更合适的策略。
Vascular Stiffness, Instead of Coronary Artery Calcification, Exhibits Significant Association With Hypertension Risk in General Population.
Background: Hypertension (HTN) significantly increases cardiovascular risk worldwide, and its incidence is expected to rise further over time. Both coronary artery calcification (CAC) and vascular stiffness (VS) potentially contribute to hypertension, but whether CAC and VS jointly aggravates the risk of hypertension remains under-explored.
Methods: We retrospectively assembled a cohort of individuals with low cardiovascular risk. Coronary computed tomography and pulse wave velocity test were used to measure CAC and VS, respectively. Subsequently, we conducted multiple logistic regression to investigate risk factors for having hypertension, incorporating CAC or VS statuses adjusting for demographics, anthropometric indices, laboratory, and echocardiographic parameters.
Results: Totally 321 community-dwelling individuals (55 ± 11 years; 73.21% male) were included. Unadjusted analyses showed that participants with CAC (odds ratio (OR) 2.331, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-3.84) or VS (OR 15.701, 95% CI 4.77-51.58) had significantly higher hypertension risk, whereas multivariate adjustment negated the relationship between CAC and hypertension (OR 1.149, 95% CI 0.55-2.38) but not that between VS and hypertension (OR 12.950, 95% CI 2.87-58.31). Analyses incorporating CAC and VS simultaneously showed that only VS independently correlated with hypertension risk but not CAC.
Conclusions: VS plays a more important role in affecting hypertension risk compared with CAC in general population. We suggest that targeting VS would be a more appropriate strategy for mitigating incident hypertension compared with treating CAC.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.