Brittany N Goldstein, Sheridan Goldstein, David H Salzman, Cara Angelotta
{"title":"决策能力:医学生课程与评估清单。","authors":"Brittany N Goldstein, Sheridan Goldstein, David H Salzman, Cara Angelotta","doi":"10.1007/s40596-025-02162-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and satisfaction of an innovative decision-making capacity curriculum in undergraduate medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Authors used Kern's six-step approach for curriculum development to develop a curriculum to teach decision-making capacity assessment. Using a modified Delphi approach, authors also created a communication checklist for decision-making capacity assessment. The educational intervention was implemented for a full academic year, targeting medical students completing their core psychiatry clerkship. Changes in knowledge and comfort level were evaluated through pre- and posttests. Satisfaction was assessed using student feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 136 medical students who completed the core psychiatry clerkship, 64 medical students completed both a pretest and posttest. Mean knowledge scores (3.5 vs 6.1, p < 0.001) and comfort level (11% vs 89% comfortable, p < 0.001) significantly improved from pretest to posttest. One hundred and five students provided course feedback, which demonstrated positive ratings of the course.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This capacity curriculum led to significant knowledge improvement and increased self-reported comfort with capacity assessment. Health professions educators can adapt this curriculum to promote competency in this important clinical skill. Moreover, educators can use this innovative capacity communication skills checklist for both learning and evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7069,"journal":{"name":"Academic Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision-Making Capacity: A Curriculum and Evaluation Checklist for Medical Students.\",\"authors\":\"Brittany N Goldstein, Sheridan Goldstein, David H Salzman, Cara Angelotta\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40596-025-02162-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and satisfaction of an innovative decision-making capacity curriculum in undergraduate medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Authors used Kern's six-step approach for curriculum development to develop a curriculum to teach decision-making capacity assessment. Using a modified Delphi approach, authors also created a communication checklist for decision-making capacity assessment. The educational intervention was implemented for a full academic year, targeting medical students completing their core psychiatry clerkship. Changes in knowledge and comfort level were evaluated through pre- and posttests. Satisfaction was assessed using student feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 136 medical students who completed the core psychiatry clerkship, 64 medical students completed both a pretest and posttest. Mean knowledge scores (3.5 vs 6.1, p < 0.001) and comfort level (11% vs 89% comfortable, p < 0.001) significantly improved from pretest to posttest. One hundred and five students provided course feedback, which demonstrated positive ratings of the course.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This capacity curriculum led to significant knowledge improvement and increased self-reported comfort with capacity assessment. Health professions educators can adapt this curriculum to promote competency in this important clinical skill. Moreover, educators can use this innovative capacity communication skills checklist for both learning and evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-025-02162-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-025-02162-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是评估创新决策能力课程在本科医学教育中的效果和满意度。方法:作者采用Kern的课程开发六步法来开发一个课程来教授决策能力评估。使用改进的德尔菲方法,作者还创建了决策能力评估的沟通清单。教育干预实施了整整一学年,目标是完成核心精神病学实习的医学生。通过前后测试评估知识和舒适度的变化。满意度是通过学生反馈来评估的。结果:136名完成精神病学核心见习的医学生中,64名医学生同时完成了前测和后测。平均知识得分(3.5 vs 6.1, p)结论:这种能力课程导致了显著的知识改善,并增加了自我报告的能力评估舒适度。卫生专业教育工作者可以调整这一课程,以提高这一重要临床技能的能力。此外,教育工作者可以在学习和评估中使用这种创新能力沟通技巧清单。
Decision-Making Capacity: A Curriculum and Evaluation Checklist for Medical Students.
Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and satisfaction of an innovative decision-making capacity curriculum in undergraduate medical education.
Methods: Authors used Kern's six-step approach for curriculum development to develop a curriculum to teach decision-making capacity assessment. Using a modified Delphi approach, authors also created a communication checklist for decision-making capacity assessment. The educational intervention was implemented for a full academic year, targeting medical students completing their core psychiatry clerkship. Changes in knowledge and comfort level were evaluated through pre- and posttests. Satisfaction was assessed using student feedback.
Results: Of the 136 medical students who completed the core psychiatry clerkship, 64 medical students completed both a pretest and posttest. Mean knowledge scores (3.5 vs 6.1, p < 0.001) and comfort level (11% vs 89% comfortable, p < 0.001) significantly improved from pretest to posttest. One hundred and five students provided course feedback, which demonstrated positive ratings of the course.
Conclusions: This capacity curriculum led to significant knowledge improvement and increased self-reported comfort with capacity assessment. Health professions educators can adapt this curriculum to promote competency in this important clinical skill. Moreover, educators can use this innovative capacity communication skills checklist for both learning and evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Academic Psychiatry is the international journal of the American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry, American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training, Association for Academic Psychiatry, and Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry.
Academic Psychiatry publishes original, scholarly work in psychiatry and the behavioral sciences that focuses on innovative education, academic leadership, and advocacy.
The scope of the journal includes work that furthers knowledge and stimulates evidence-based advances in academic psychiatry in the following domains: education and training, leadership and administration, career and professional development, ethics and professionalism, and health and well-being.