评估人体皮肤的各向异性机械反应:来自临床试验的见解。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Aflah Elouneg, Arnaud Lejeune, Gwenaël Rolin, Thomas Lihoreau, Brice Chatelain, Stéphane Bordas, Emmanuelle Jacquet, Jérôme Chambert
{"title":"评估人体皮肤的各向异性机械反应:来自临床试验的见解。","authors":"Aflah Elouneg, Arnaud Lejeune, Gwenaël Rolin, Thomas Lihoreau, Brice Chatelain, Stéphane Bordas, Emmanuelle Jacquet, Jérôme Chambert","doi":"10.1007/s10237-025-01955-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper presents findings from the SKin Uncertainties Modeling (SKUM) clinical trial aimed at assessing the anisotropic mechanical response of human skin using the annular suction test, employing a numerical method and a commercial device, CutiScan<sup>®</sup> CS 100. A cohort of 30 healthy volunteers participated in the trial, undergoing in vivo testing on the left forearm through a multi-axial stretch induced by ring suction. Determination of the anisotropy axis was performed using a numerical method based on model fitting of experimental data obtained from oriented elliptic curves, which resulted from the radial deformation of circles. The study evaluates the reproducibility and variability of measurements through an intra-subject study involving five participants, providing insights into the consistency of results within individuals. Additionally, an inter-subject analysis across all subjects offers a comprehensive understanding of anisotropy variability, elucidating broader population tendencies. Furthermore, the study explores correlations between anisotropy and demographic factors such as sex, age, and skin thickness, shedding light on potential influences on skin biomechanics. The analysis showed significant correlations between skin anisotropy and sex, with males displaying a distinct anisotropy axis orientation compared to females. In contrast, no significant associations were found between anisotropy and age among individuals aged 20-50, or between anisotropy and epidermal thickness.</p>","PeriodicalId":489,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","volume":" ","pages":"1085-1102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of anisotropic mechanical response of human skin: insights from a clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Aflah Elouneg, Arnaud Lejeune, Gwenaël Rolin, Thomas Lihoreau, Brice Chatelain, Stéphane Bordas, Emmanuelle Jacquet, Jérôme Chambert\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10237-025-01955-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper presents findings from the SKin Uncertainties Modeling (SKUM) clinical trial aimed at assessing the anisotropic mechanical response of human skin using the annular suction test, employing a numerical method and a commercial device, CutiScan<sup>®</sup> CS 100. A cohort of 30 healthy volunteers participated in the trial, undergoing in vivo testing on the left forearm through a multi-axial stretch induced by ring suction. Determination of the anisotropy axis was performed using a numerical method based on model fitting of experimental data obtained from oriented elliptic curves, which resulted from the radial deformation of circles. The study evaluates the reproducibility and variability of measurements through an intra-subject study involving five participants, providing insights into the consistency of results within individuals. Additionally, an inter-subject analysis across all subjects offers a comprehensive understanding of anisotropy variability, elucidating broader population tendencies. Furthermore, the study explores correlations between anisotropy and demographic factors such as sex, age, and skin thickness, shedding light on potential influences on skin biomechanics. The analysis showed significant correlations between skin anisotropy and sex, with males displaying a distinct anisotropy axis orientation compared to females. In contrast, no significant associations were found between anisotropy and age among individuals aged 20-50, or between anisotropy and epidermal thickness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1085-1102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-025-01955-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-025-01955-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了皮肤不确定性模型(SKUM)临床试验的结果,该试验旨在通过环形吸吸试验评估人体皮肤的各向异性力学反应,采用数值方法和商用设备CutiScan®CS 100。一组30名健康志愿者参加了该试验,通过环吸诱导的多轴拉伸在左前臂上进行了体内测试。各向异性轴的确定采用基于模型拟合实验数据的数值方法,实验数据来源于圆形径向变形引起的定向椭圆曲线。该研究通过涉及五名参与者的受试者内部研究来评估测量的可重复性和可变性,从而深入了解个体结果的一致性。此外,跨所有学科的学科间分析提供了对各向异性变异性的全面理解,阐明了更广泛的种群趋势。此外,该研究还探讨了各向异性与人口统计学因素(如性别、年龄和皮肤厚度)之间的相关性,揭示了对皮肤生物力学的潜在影响。分析表明,皮肤各向异性与性别之间存在显著的相关性,与女性相比,男性表现出明显的各向异性轴方向。相反,在20-50岁的个体中,各向异性与年龄、表皮厚度之间没有显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of anisotropic mechanical response of human skin: insights from a clinical trial.

This paper presents findings from the SKin Uncertainties Modeling (SKUM) clinical trial aimed at assessing the anisotropic mechanical response of human skin using the annular suction test, employing a numerical method and a commercial device, CutiScan® CS 100. A cohort of 30 healthy volunteers participated in the trial, undergoing in vivo testing on the left forearm through a multi-axial stretch induced by ring suction. Determination of the anisotropy axis was performed using a numerical method based on model fitting of experimental data obtained from oriented elliptic curves, which resulted from the radial deformation of circles. The study evaluates the reproducibility and variability of measurements through an intra-subject study involving five participants, providing insights into the consistency of results within individuals. Additionally, an inter-subject analysis across all subjects offers a comprehensive understanding of anisotropy variability, elucidating broader population tendencies. Furthermore, the study explores correlations between anisotropy and demographic factors such as sex, age, and skin thickness, shedding light on potential influences on skin biomechanics. The analysis showed significant correlations between skin anisotropy and sex, with males displaying a distinct anisotropy axis orientation compared to females. In contrast, no significant associations were found between anisotropy and age among individuals aged 20-50, or between anisotropy and epidermal thickness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Mechanics regulates biological processes at the molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, and organism levels. A goal of this journal is to promote basic and applied research that integrates the expanding knowledge-bases in the allied fields of biomechanics and mechanobiology. Approaches may be experimental, theoretical, or computational; they may address phenomena at the nano, micro, or macrolevels. Of particular interest are investigations that (1) quantify the mechanical environment in which cells and matrix function in health, disease, or injury, (2) identify and quantify mechanosensitive responses and their mechanisms, (3) detail inter-relations between mechanics and biological processes such as growth, remodeling, adaptation, and repair, and (4) report discoveries that advance therapeutic and diagnostic procedures. Especially encouraged are analytical and computational models based on solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, or thermomechanics, and their interactions; also encouraged are reports of new experimental methods that expand measurement capabilities and new mathematical methods that facilitate analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信