Chethan M. Puttarajappa , Megan Urbanski , M. Kazem Fallahzadeh , Pooja Budhiraja , Vasanthi Balaraman , W. Scott Butsch , Harry Morford , Prince M. Anand , Kenneth J. Woodside , Babak J. Orandi
{"title":"肥胖患者肾移植候选人和受者的管理实践:美国移植项目调查","authors":"Chethan M. Puttarajappa , Megan Urbanski , M. Kazem Fallahzadeh , Pooja Budhiraja , Vasanthi Balaraman , W. Scott Butsch , Harry Morford , Prince M. Anand , Kenneth J. Woodside , Babak J. Orandi","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.05.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span><span>There is growing kidney transplant program-level interest in addressing obesity. The American Society of </span>Transplantation Kidney Pancreas<span><span><span> Community of Practice Obesity Work Group surveyed US programs to characterize evaluation, listing, and weight management practices. A web-based survey was administered to professionals involved in kidney transplant care (transplant nephrologists/surgeons/coordinators/dietitians, endocrinologists, </span>bariatric surgeons, and obesity medicine specialists) from May 2024 to September 2024. The 275 respondents from 113 programs represented 70.7% of the US transplant volume. A </span>body mass index (BMI) cutoff—commonly 40 kg/m</span></span><sup>2</sup>—is used for evaluation/listing at 72.5%/74.3% of programs. For recipients, BMI 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup><span><span> was the most common threshold for referral for medical and surgical weight loss. Most (73.4%) programs have weight management programs within their institution; 19.4% have a program integrated into their transplant program. One of the most common reasons for not referring for weight management was a preference that primary care providers/general nephrologists manage this, particularly pretransplant. Of programs, 27.6% offer robotic </span>kidney transplantation; 38.5% offer it only to patients above a BMI threshold (32-40 kg/m</span><sup>2</sup><span>). Obesity management is heterogeneous. Most use a BMI cutoff—typically 40 kg/m</span><sup>2</sup>—for evaluation and listing. These data provide the most comprehensive and contemporary overview of practices at US programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":"25 10","pages":"Pages 2194-2205"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practices in the management of kidney transplant candidates and recipients with obesity: A survey of United States transplant programs\",\"authors\":\"Chethan M. Puttarajappa , Megan Urbanski , M. Kazem Fallahzadeh , Pooja Budhiraja , Vasanthi Balaraman , W. Scott Butsch , Harry Morford , Prince M. Anand , Kenneth J. Woodside , Babak J. Orandi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.05.033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><span><span>There is growing kidney transplant program-level interest in addressing obesity. The American Society of </span>Transplantation Kidney Pancreas<span><span><span> Community of Practice Obesity Work Group surveyed US programs to characterize evaluation, listing, and weight management practices. A web-based survey was administered to professionals involved in kidney transplant care (transplant nephrologists/surgeons/coordinators/dietitians, endocrinologists, </span>bariatric surgeons, and obesity medicine specialists) from May 2024 to September 2024. The 275 respondents from 113 programs represented 70.7% of the US transplant volume. A </span>body mass index (BMI) cutoff—commonly 40 kg/m</span></span><sup>2</sup>—is used for evaluation/listing at 72.5%/74.3% of programs. For recipients, BMI 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup><span><span> was the most common threshold for referral for medical and surgical weight loss. Most (73.4%) programs have weight management programs within their institution; 19.4% have a program integrated into their transplant program. One of the most common reasons for not referring for weight management was a preference that primary care providers/general nephrologists manage this, particularly pretransplant. Of programs, 27.6% offer robotic </span>kidney transplantation; 38.5% offer it only to patients above a BMI threshold (32-40 kg/m</span><sup>2</sup><span>). Obesity management is heterogeneous. Most use a BMI cutoff—typically 40 kg/m</span><sup>2</sup>—for evaluation and listing. These data provide the most comprehensive and contemporary overview of practices at US programs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"25 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2194-2205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1600613525002904\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1600613525002904","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Practices in the management of kidney transplant candidates and recipients with obesity: A survey of United States transplant programs
There is growing kidney transplant program-level interest in addressing obesity. The American Society of Transplantation Kidney Pancreas Community of Practice Obesity Work Group surveyed US programs to characterize evaluation, listing, and weight management practices. A web-based survey was administered to professionals involved in kidney transplant care (transplant nephrologists/surgeons/coordinators/dietitians, endocrinologists, bariatric surgeons, and obesity medicine specialists) from May 2024 to September 2024. The 275 respondents from 113 programs represented 70.7% of the US transplant volume. A body mass index (BMI) cutoff—commonly 40 kg/m2—is used for evaluation/listing at 72.5%/74.3% of programs. For recipients, BMI 40 kg/m2 was the most common threshold for referral for medical and surgical weight loss. Most (73.4%) programs have weight management programs within their institution; 19.4% have a program integrated into their transplant program. One of the most common reasons for not referring for weight management was a preference that primary care providers/general nephrologists manage this, particularly pretransplant. Of programs, 27.6% offer robotic kidney transplantation; 38.5% offer it only to patients above a BMI threshold (32-40 kg/m2). Obesity management is heterogeneous. Most use a BMI cutoff—typically 40 kg/m2—for evaluation and listing. These data provide the most comprehensive and contemporary overview of practices at US programs.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide.
The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.