主动脉缩窄的产前超声血管参数变化及危险因素

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Guihong Chen, Jie Mi, Yongfeng Han, Lu Qin, Yuanyuan Peng, Xuna Geng, Pei Zhou, Tianxiao Yu, Congxin Sun, Bu-Lang Gao, Shuping Ge
{"title":"主动脉缩窄的产前超声血管参数变化及危险因素","authors":"Guihong Chen,&nbsp;Jie Mi,&nbsp;Yongfeng Han,&nbsp;Lu Qin,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Peng,&nbsp;Xuna Geng,&nbsp;Pei Zhou,&nbsp;Tianxiao Yu,&nbsp;Congxin Sun,&nbsp;Bu-Lang Gao,&nbsp;Shuping Ge","doi":"10.1111/echo.70210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate changes in ultrasound vascular parameters in fetuses with coarctation of the aorta (CoA) and risk factors for CoA presence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fetuses of CoA and healthy controls without CoA confirmed after birth were prospectively enrolled. All ultrasound-related vascular parameters were analyzed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-five CoA positive fetuses and 336 age-matched (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) healthy fetuses were enrolled. Compared with the normal fetuses, CoA positive fetuses exhibited significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) different ultrasound parameters. Significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) independent risk factors of CoA presence were DA diameter, isthmus diameter at 3 vessel trachea view, arch diameter, left common carotid artery (LCCA) to left subclavian artery (LSA) distance, ascending aorta (AAO) diameter, and main pulmonary artery (MPA) diameter. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and cutoff value were 0.997 and 0.395, respectively, for the overall fitted model <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <mrow>\n <mo>[</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mfrac>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mn>4.85</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mn>62.58</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mtext>DA diameter</mtext>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>22.89</mn>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mtext>isthmic diameter</mtext>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>48.76</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mtext>arch segment 2 diameter</mtext>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mn>31.18</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mtext>LCCA-LSA distance</mtext>\n </mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>60.82</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mtext>AAO diameter</mtext>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mn>25.04</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mtext>MPA diameter</mtext>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>20.51</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mtext>DAO diameter</mtext>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>0.003</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mtext>DA-Isthmus angle</mtext>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mfrac>\n <mo>]</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$ (p = 1/[1 + e{{ -(4.85\\,{+}\\,62.58\\,{\\times}\\,\\text{DA diameter} -22.89\\times \\text{isthmic diameter}\\ -48.76\\,{\\times}\\, \\text{arch segment 2 diameter}\\ +31.18\\,{\\times}\\, \\text{LCCA-LSA distance}} \\atop { -60.82\\,{\\times}\\,\\text{AAO diameter}\\,{+}\\,25.04\\,{\\times}\\,\\text{MPA diameter}\\ -20.51\\,{\\times}\\,\\text{DAO diameter} -0.003\\,{\\times}\\, \\text{DA-Isthmus angle} )}}]$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> with the mean gestational age 28 weeks, 0.704 and 0.33 cm for DA diameter, 0.891 and 0.27 cm for isthmus diameter, 0.808 and 0.26 cm for aortic arch diameter, 0.676 and 0.28 mm for LCCA-LSA distance, 0.707 and 0.39 cm for AAO diameter, and 0.566 and 0.86 cm for MPA diameter, with a high negative predictive value all above 0.90.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>CoA positive fetuses exhibit significant differences in prenatal sonographic vascular parameters, and the LCCA-LSA distance and diameter of DA, aortic isthmus, arch, AAO, and MPA are independent risk factors for CoA presence.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50558,"journal":{"name":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","volume":"42 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes of Prenatal Sonographic Vascular Parameters in Coarctation of the Aorta and the Risk Factors\",\"authors\":\"Guihong Chen,&nbsp;Jie Mi,&nbsp;Yongfeng Han,&nbsp;Lu Qin,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Peng,&nbsp;Xuna Geng,&nbsp;Pei Zhou,&nbsp;Tianxiao Yu,&nbsp;Congxin Sun,&nbsp;Bu-Lang Gao,&nbsp;Shuping Ge\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/echo.70210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate changes in ultrasound vascular parameters in fetuses with coarctation of the aorta (CoA) and risk factors for CoA presence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fetuses of CoA and healthy controls without CoA confirmed after birth were prospectively enrolled. All ultrasound-related vascular parameters were analyzed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty-five CoA positive fetuses and 336 age-matched (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) healthy fetuses were enrolled. Compared with the normal fetuses, CoA positive fetuses exhibited significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) different ultrasound parameters. Significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) independent risk factors of CoA presence were DA diameter, isthmus diameter at 3 vessel trachea view, arch diameter, left common carotid artery (LCCA) to left subclavian artery (LSA) distance, ascending aorta (AAO) diameter, and main pulmonary artery (MPA) diameter. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and cutoff value were 0.997 and 0.395, respectively, for the overall fitted model <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>(</mo>\\n <mi>p</mi>\\n <mo>=</mo>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n <mo>/</mo>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>[</mo>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n <mo>+</mo>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mfrac>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mo>(</mo>\\n <mn>4.85</mn>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mo>+</mo>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mn>62.58</mn>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mo>×</mo>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mtext>DA diameter</mtext>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>22.89</mn>\\n <mo>×</mo>\\n <mtext>isthmic diameter</mtext>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>48.76</mn>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mo>×</mo>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mtext>arch segment 2 diameter</mtext>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mo>+</mo>\\n <mn>31.18</mn>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mo>×</mo>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mtext>LCCA-LSA distance</mtext>\\n </mrow>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>60.82</mn>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mo>×</mo>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mtext>AAO diameter</mtext>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mo>+</mo>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mn>25.04</mn>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mo>×</mo>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mtext>MPA diameter</mtext>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>20.51</mn>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mo>×</mo>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mtext>DAO diameter</mtext>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>0.003</mn>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mo>×</mo>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mtext>DA-Isthmus angle</mtext>\\n <mo>)</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n </mfrac>\\n <mo>]</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$ (p = 1/[1 + e{{ -(4.85\\\\,{+}\\\\,62.58\\\\,{\\\\times}\\\\,\\\\text{DA diameter} -22.89\\\\times \\\\text{isthmic diameter}\\\\ -48.76\\\\,{\\\\times}\\\\, \\\\text{arch segment 2 diameter}\\\\ +31.18\\\\,{\\\\times}\\\\, \\\\text{LCCA-LSA distance}} \\\\atop { -60.82\\\\,{\\\\times}\\\\,\\\\text{AAO diameter}\\\\,{+}\\\\,25.04\\\\,{\\\\times}\\\\,\\\\text{MPA diameter}\\\\ -20.51\\\\,{\\\\times}\\\\,\\\\text{DAO diameter} -0.003\\\\,{\\\\times}\\\\, \\\\text{DA-Isthmus angle} )}}]$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> with the mean gestational age 28 weeks, 0.704 and 0.33 cm for DA diameter, 0.891 and 0.27 cm for isthmus diameter, 0.808 and 0.26 cm for aortic arch diameter, 0.676 and 0.28 mm for LCCA-LSA distance, 0.707 and 0.39 cm for AAO diameter, and 0.566 and 0.86 cm for MPA diameter, with a high negative predictive value all above 0.90.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>CoA positive fetuses exhibit significant differences in prenatal sonographic vascular parameters, and the LCCA-LSA distance and diameter of DA, aortic isthmus, arch, AAO, and MPA are independent risk factors for CoA presence.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques\",\"volume\":\"42 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/echo.70210\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/echo.70210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨主动脉缩窄(CoA)胎儿超声血管参数的变化及发生CoA的危险因素。材料与方法前瞻性地纳入了CoA胎儿和出生后未证实CoA的健康对照。分析超声相关血管参数。结果CoA阳性胎儿45例,年龄匹配胎儿336例(p >;0.05)健康胎儿入组。与正常胎儿相比,CoA阳性胎儿表现出显著的(p <;0.05)不同超声参数。显著性(p <;0.05)存在CoA的独立危险因素为DA直径、3支气管峡部直径、弓径、左颈总动脉(LCCA)至左锁骨下动脉(LSA)距离、升主动脉(AAO)直径、肺动脉主动脉(MPA)直径。受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.997,截止值为0.395;对于整体拟合模型(p = 1 / [1 + e−(4.85+ 62.58 × DA直径−22.89 ×地峡直径−48.76 ×拱段2直径+ 31.18 × LCCA-LSA距离−60.82 × AAO直径+ 25.04 × MPA直径- 20.51 × DAO直径- 0.003 × da -峡角$ (p = 1/[1 + e{{-(4.85\,{+}\,62.58\,{\times}\,\text{DA直径}-22.89\times \,\text{地峡直径}\ -48.76\,{\times}\, \text{拱段2直径}\ +31.18\,{\times}\,{LCCA-LSA距离}}\ \文本在{-60.82 \{\ *}\ \文本{氧化铝直径}\ {+}\ 25.04 \ {\ *}\,{MPA直径}\ -20.51 \ \文本,{\ *}\,-0.003{刀直径}\ \文本,{\ *}\,文本\ {DA-Isthmus角 } )}}]$ 平均妊娠年龄28周,0.704和DA直径0.33厘米,直径0.891和0.27厘米地峡,主动脉弓直径0.808 - 0.26厘米,0.676和0.28毫米LCCA-LSA距离,0.707和0.39厘米直径的氧化铝,和0.566 MPA直径0.86厘米,阴性预测值均在0.90以上,阴性预测值较高。结论CoA阳性胎儿在产前超声血管参数上存在显著差异,LCCA-LSA距离和DA直径、主动脉峡部、弓、AAO、MPA是CoA存在的独立危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes of Prenatal Sonographic Vascular Parameters in Coarctation of the Aorta and the Risk Factors

Purpose

To investigate changes in ultrasound vascular parameters in fetuses with coarctation of the aorta (CoA) and risk factors for CoA presence.

Materials and Methods

Fetuses of CoA and healthy controls without CoA confirmed after birth were prospectively enrolled. All ultrasound-related vascular parameters were analyzed.

Results

Forty-five CoA positive fetuses and 336 age-matched (p > 0.05) healthy fetuses were enrolled. Compared with the normal fetuses, CoA positive fetuses exhibited significantly (p < 0.05) different ultrasound parameters. Significant (p < 0.05) independent risk factors of CoA presence were DA diameter, isthmus diameter at 3 vessel trachea view, arch diameter, left common carotid artery (LCCA) to left subclavian artery (LSA) distance, ascending aorta (AAO) diameter, and main pulmonary artery (MPA) diameter. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and cutoff value were 0.997 and 0.395, respectively, for the overall fitted model ( p = 1 / [ 1 + e ( 4.85 + 62.58 × DA diameter 22.89 × isthmic diameter 48.76 × arch segment 2 diameter + 31.18 × LCCA-LSA distance 60.82 × AAO diameter + 25.04 × MPA diameter 20.51 × DAO diameter 0.003 × DA-Isthmus angle ) ] $ (p = 1/[1 + e{{ -(4.85\,{+}\,62.58\,{\times}\,\text{DA diameter} -22.89\times \text{isthmic diameter}\ -48.76\,{\times}\, \text{arch segment 2 diameter}\ +31.18\,{\times}\, \text{LCCA-LSA distance}} \atop { -60.82\,{\times}\,\text{AAO diameter}\,{+}\,25.04\,{\times}\,\text{MPA diameter}\ -20.51\,{\times}\,\text{DAO diameter} -0.003\,{\times}\, \text{DA-Isthmus angle} )}}]$ with the mean gestational age 28 weeks, 0.704 and 0.33 cm for DA diameter, 0.891 and 0.27 cm for isthmus diameter, 0.808 and 0.26 cm for aortic arch diameter, 0.676 and 0.28 mm for LCCA-LSA distance, 0.707 and 0.39 cm for AAO diameter, and 0.566 and 0.86 cm for MPA diameter, with a high negative predictive value all above 0.90.

Conclusion

CoA positive fetuses exhibit significant differences in prenatal sonographic vascular parameters, and the LCCA-LSA distance and diameter of DA, aortic isthmus, arch, AAO, and MPA are independent risk factors for CoA presence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Echocardiography: A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques is the official publication of the International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound. Widely recognized for its comprehensive peer-reviewed articles, case studies, original research, and reviews by international authors. Echocardiography keeps its readership of echocardiographers, ultrasound specialists, and cardiologists well informed of the latest developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信