机器学习对截肢风险的洞察:评估糖尿病足溃疡的伤口分类系统

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Farideh Mostafavi, Mohammad Reza Amini, Yadollah Mehrabi, Ensieh Nasli Esfahani, Seyed Saeed Hashemi Nazari
{"title":"机器学习对截肢风险的洞察:评估糖尿病足溃疡的伤口分类系统","authors":"Farideh Mostafavi,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Amini,&nbsp;Yadollah Mehrabi,&nbsp;Ensieh Nasli Esfahani,&nbsp;Seyed Saeed Hashemi Nazari","doi":"10.1111/iwj.70515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study compares the performance of various wound classification systems to determine which system most effectively predicts amputation risk in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients. Additionally, it identifies the key clinical and socioeconomic factors that influence this risk. A total of 616 DFUs from 400 outpatient participants in a prospective cohort study were followed over 6 months. Ten machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of various wound classification systems. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to interpret the predictions of the selected model. The DIAFORA (diabetic foot risk assessment) and WIFI (Wound, Ischaemia and foot Infection) classification systems demonstrated the highest predictive power for predicting amputation within 6 months. SHAP analysis revealed that wound penetration to bone, presence of ischaemia and infection, renal failure, delayed first specialist visit, longer diabetes duration, high baseline HbA1c, low education levels and high body mass index were significant risk factors for amputation. Conversely, higher education levels served as a protective factor. Occupation showed variable effects, with private-sector employment associated with increased risk, while being a housewife was linked to lower risk. Infection and ischaemia are significant factors affecting DFU outcomes. Addressing treatment adherence barriers and implementing tailored interventions that consider patients' occupational needs can reduce amputation rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"22 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iwj.70515","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Insights Into Amputation Risk: Evaluating Wound Classification Systems in Diabetic Foot Ulcers\",\"authors\":\"Farideh Mostafavi,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Amini,&nbsp;Yadollah Mehrabi,&nbsp;Ensieh Nasli Esfahani,&nbsp;Seyed Saeed Hashemi Nazari\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iwj.70515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study compares the performance of various wound classification systems to determine which system most effectively predicts amputation risk in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients. Additionally, it identifies the key clinical and socioeconomic factors that influence this risk. A total of 616 DFUs from 400 outpatient participants in a prospective cohort study were followed over 6 months. Ten machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of various wound classification systems. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to interpret the predictions of the selected model. The DIAFORA (diabetic foot risk assessment) and WIFI (Wound, Ischaemia and foot Infection) classification systems demonstrated the highest predictive power for predicting amputation within 6 months. SHAP analysis revealed that wound penetration to bone, presence of ischaemia and infection, renal failure, delayed first specialist visit, longer diabetes duration, high baseline HbA1c, low education levels and high body mass index were significant risk factors for amputation. Conversely, higher education levels served as a protective factor. Occupation showed variable effects, with private-sector employment associated with increased risk, while being a housewife was linked to lower risk. Infection and ischaemia are significant factors affecting DFU outcomes. Addressing treatment adherence barriers and implementing tailored interventions that consider patients' occupational needs can reduce amputation rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Wound Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iwj.70515\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Wound Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70515\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究比较了各种伤口分类系统的性能,以确定哪种系统最有效地预测糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)患者的截肢风险。此外,它还确定了影响这种风险的关键临床和社会经济因素。在一项前瞻性队列研究中,来自400名门诊参与者的616名dfu被随访了6个多月。采用10种机器学习(ML)算法来评估各种伤口分类系统的预测准确性。采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)方法对所选模型的预测结果进行解释。DIAFORA(糖尿病足风险评估)和WIFI(伤口、缺血和足部感染)分类系统对6个月内截肢的预测能力最高。SHAP分析显示,伤口穿透骨骼、存在缺血和感染、肾衰竭、首次专科就诊延迟、糖尿病持续时间较长、基线HbA1c高、教育水平低和体重指数高是截肢的重要危险因素。相反,高等教育水平起到了保护作用。职业表现出不同的影响,私营部门就业与风险增加有关,而家庭主妇与风险较低有关。感染和缺血是影响DFU预后的重要因素。解决治疗依从性障碍并实施考虑患者职业需求的量身定制的干预措施可以降低截肢率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine Learning Insights Into Amputation Risk: Evaluating Wound Classification Systems in Diabetic Foot Ulcers

This study compares the performance of various wound classification systems to determine which system most effectively predicts amputation risk in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients. Additionally, it identifies the key clinical and socioeconomic factors that influence this risk. A total of 616 DFUs from 400 outpatient participants in a prospective cohort study were followed over 6 months. Ten machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of various wound classification systems. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to interpret the predictions of the selected model. The DIAFORA (diabetic foot risk assessment) and WIFI (Wound, Ischaemia and foot Infection) classification systems demonstrated the highest predictive power for predicting amputation within 6 months. SHAP analysis revealed that wound penetration to bone, presence of ischaemia and infection, renal failure, delayed first specialist visit, longer diabetes duration, high baseline HbA1c, low education levels and high body mass index were significant risk factors for amputation. Conversely, higher education levels served as a protective factor. Occupation showed variable effects, with private-sector employment associated with increased risk, while being a housewife was linked to lower risk. Infection and ischaemia are significant factors affecting DFU outcomes. Addressing treatment adherence barriers and implementing tailored interventions that consider patients' occupational needs can reduce amputation rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Wound Journal
International Wound Journal DERMATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
266
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories: - Research papers - Review articles - Clinical studies - Letters - News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies. Calendar of events The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信