13c -葡萄糖修正实验研究全球土壤微生物碳积累效率

IF 5.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Wanjia Hu, Yue Cai, Xingqi Li, Cheng Wang, Juan Jia, Xiaojuan Feng
{"title":"13c -葡萄糖修正实验研究全球土壤微生物碳积累效率","authors":"Wanjia Hu,&nbsp;Yue Cai,&nbsp;Xingqi Li,&nbsp;Cheng Wang,&nbsp;Juan Jia,&nbsp;Xiaojuan Feng","doi":"10.1029/2025GB008553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurately assessing the efficiency of microbial carbon (C) conversion and accumulation associated with soil “microbial C pump” (MCP) is essential for understanding microbial-mediated soil C sequestration. Conventional assessments based on microbial C use efficiency (CUE) hinge on living biomass only and do not include microbial necromass, which may not depict microbial C accumulation. Here we propose a simple and rapid approach based on <sup>13</sup>C-glucose amendment experiment to assess microbial C accumulation efficiency (CAE) in a relatively short term. We first validated the approach by showing negligible sorption of glucose to soils with a wide range of edaphic properties. Glucose-derived <sup>13</sup>C may hence be considered to represent microbial C (including biomass and residues) after a few days of addition, given the rapid uptake of glucose by microbes. Microbial CAE may thus be assessed as the recovery of glucose-derived <sup>13</sup>C in the soil. By further conducting a meta-analysis of literature data involving isotopically labeled glucose amendment experiments, we revealed distinct variation patterns and influencing factors of CAE and CUE across various terrestrial ecosystems. Compared to CUE, which is mainly regulated by factors influencing microbial physiological processes (particularly substrate availability), CAE is jointly regulated by factors that influence microbial growth and residue persistence (e.g., clay content). These findings underscore that CAE is decoupled from CUE. Given the potential divergence in microbial biomass and residue responses to environmental perturbations, CAE provides a more accurate measure of microbial C conversion and accumulation efficiency than CUE, enabling a clearer understanding of MCP dynamics under global changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":"39 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbial Carbon Accumulation Efficiency in Global Soils Resolved via 13C-Glucose Amendment Experiments\",\"authors\":\"Wanjia Hu,&nbsp;Yue Cai,&nbsp;Xingqi Li,&nbsp;Cheng Wang,&nbsp;Juan Jia,&nbsp;Xiaojuan Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025GB008553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurately assessing the efficiency of microbial carbon (C) conversion and accumulation associated with soil “microbial C pump” (MCP) is essential for understanding microbial-mediated soil C sequestration. Conventional assessments based on microbial C use efficiency (CUE) hinge on living biomass only and do not include microbial necromass, which may not depict microbial C accumulation. Here we propose a simple and rapid approach based on <sup>13</sup>C-glucose amendment experiment to assess microbial C accumulation efficiency (CAE) in a relatively short term. We first validated the approach by showing negligible sorption of glucose to soils with a wide range of edaphic properties. Glucose-derived <sup>13</sup>C may hence be considered to represent microbial C (including biomass and residues) after a few days of addition, given the rapid uptake of glucose by microbes. Microbial CAE may thus be assessed as the recovery of glucose-derived <sup>13</sup>C in the soil. By further conducting a meta-analysis of literature data involving isotopically labeled glucose amendment experiments, we revealed distinct variation patterns and influencing factors of CAE and CUE across various terrestrial ecosystems. Compared to CUE, which is mainly regulated by factors influencing microbial physiological processes (particularly substrate availability), CAE is jointly regulated by factors that influence microbial growth and residue persistence (e.g., clay content). These findings underscore that CAE is decoupled from CUE. Given the potential divergence in microbial biomass and residue responses to environmental perturbations, CAE provides a more accurate measure of microbial C conversion and accumulation efficiency than CUE, enabling a clearer understanding of MCP dynamics under global changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Biogeochemical Cycles\",\"volume\":\"39 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Biogeochemical Cycles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GB008553\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GB008553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确评估与土壤“微生物碳泵”(MCP)相关的微生物碳(C)转化和积累效率,对于理解微生物介导的土壤碳固存至关重要。基于微生物C利用效率(CUE)的传统评估仅取决于活生物量,而不包括微生物坏死块,这可能无法描述微生物C积累。在此,我们提出了一种基于13c -葡萄糖修正实验的简单快速的方法来评估微生物C积累效率(CAE)。我们首先通过显示葡萄糖对具有广泛土壤特性的土壤的可忽略不计的吸收来验证该方法。因此,考虑到微生物对葡萄糖的快速吸收,葡萄糖衍生的13C可以被认为是添加几天后的微生物C(包括生物量和残留物)。因此,微生物CAE可以被评估为土壤中葡萄糖来源的13C的恢复。通过同位素标记葡萄糖修正实验的meta分析,揭示了CAE和CUE在不同陆地生态系统中的不同变化模式和影响因素。CUE主要受影响微生物生理过程的因素(特别是底物有效性)调控,而CAE受影响微生物生长和残留持久性的因素(如粘土含量)共同调控。这些发现强调CAE与CUE是分离的。考虑到微生物生物量和残留物对环境扰动的潜在差异,CAE提供了比CUE更准确的微生物C转化和积累效率测量,使我们能够更清楚地了解全球变化下的MCP动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microbial Carbon Accumulation Efficiency in Global Soils Resolved via 13C-Glucose Amendment Experiments

Accurately assessing the efficiency of microbial carbon (C) conversion and accumulation associated with soil “microbial C pump” (MCP) is essential for understanding microbial-mediated soil C sequestration. Conventional assessments based on microbial C use efficiency (CUE) hinge on living biomass only and do not include microbial necromass, which may not depict microbial C accumulation. Here we propose a simple and rapid approach based on 13C-glucose amendment experiment to assess microbial C accumulation efficiency (CAE) in a relatively short term. We first validated the approach by showing negligible sorption of glucose to soils with a wide range of edaphic properties. Glucose-derived 13C may hence be considered to represent microbial C (including biomass and residues) after a few days of addition, given the rapid uptake of glucose by microbes. Microbial CAE may thus be assessed as the recovery of glucose-derived 13C in the soil. By further conducting a meta-analysis of literature data involving isotopically labeled glucose amendment experiments, we revealed distinct variation patterns and influencing factors of CAE and CUE across various terrestrial ecosystems. Compared to CUE, which is mainly regulated by factors influencing microbial physiological processes (particularly substrate availability), CAE is jointly regulated by factors that influence microbial growth and residue persistence (e.g., clay content). These findings underscore that CAE is decoupled from CUE. Given the potential divergence in microbial biomass and residue responses to environmental perturbations, CAE provides a more accurate measure of microbial C conversion and accumulation efficiency than CUE, enabling a clearer understanding of MCP dynamics under global changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Global Biogeochemical Cycles 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信