全球化与金融发展是否促进东盟国家可再生能源转型?——实证重访

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Yongming Huang, Mohammad Jalal Uddin
{"title":"全球化与金融发展是否促进东盟国家可再生能源转型?——实证重访","authors":"Yongming Huang,&nbsp;Mohammad Jalal Uddin","doi":"10.1002/app5.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study empirically revisits the unsolved debate of whether globalisation (GLZ) and financial development (FIND) promote the renewable energy (RE) transition in the context of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). The panel-corrected-standard-error technique infers that a one-point increase in GLZ and FIND reduces the RE share in total energy consumption in the ASEAN region by 0.71% and 8.41%, respectively. It finds that the investment in energy with private participation moderates the relationship between FIND and RE, and FDI except in energy moderates the relations between GLZ and RE. The country-specific estimation suggests that Cambodia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam be concerned about GLZ, while the Philippines and Vietnam also be concerned about FIND since these might affect their RE transition process. The ASEAN policymakers should earmark funds specifically for renewables and prudently navigate the trade globalisation process to transform this region into a low-carbon region.</p>","PeriodicalId":45839,"journal":{"name":"Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/app5.70031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Globalisation and Financial Development Promote Renewable Energy Transitions in ASEAN Countries?—An Empirical Revisit\",\"authors\":\"Yongming Huang,&nbsp;Mohammad Jalal Uddin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/app5.70031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study empirically revisits the unsolved debate of whether globalisation (GLZ) and financial development (FIND) promote the renewable energy (RE) transition in the context of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). The panel-corrected-standard-error technique infers that a one-point increase in GLZ and FIND reduces the RE share in total energy consumption in the ASEAN region by 0.71% and 8.41%, respectively. It finds that the investment in energy with private participation moderates the relationship between FIND and RE, and FDI except in energy moderates the relations between GLZ and RE. The country-specific estimation suggests that Cambodia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam be concerned about GLZ, while the Philippines and Vietnam also be concerned about FIND since these might affect their RE transition process. The ASEAN policymakers should earmark funds specifically for renewables and prudently navigate the trade globalisation process to transform this region into a low-carbon region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/app5.70031\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app5.70031\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app5.70031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究在东南亚国家联盟(ASEAN)和区域全面经济伙伴关系(RCEP)的背景下,实证地重新审视了全球化(GLZ)和金融发展(FIND)是否促进了可再生能源(RE)转型这一尚未解决的争论。面板校正标准误差技术推断,GLZ和FIND每增加一个点,可再生能源在东盟地区总能源消耗中的份额分别降低0.71%和8.41%。研究发现,私人参与的能源投资调节了可再生能源与可再生能源之间的关系,而能源领域以外的外国直接投资调节了可再生能源与可再生能源之间的关系。具体国家的估计表明,柬埔寨、马来西亚、菲律宾、泰国和越南关注可再生能源与可再生能源之间的关系,而菲律宾和越南也关注可再生能源与可再生能源之间的关系,因为这些可能影响其可再生能源转型过程。东盟政策制定者应专门为可再生能源提供资金,并审慎驾驭贸易全球化进程,将本地区转变为低碳地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Globalisation and Financial Development Promote Renewable Energy Transitions in ASEAN Countries?—An Empirical Revisit

This study empirically revisits the unsolved debate of whether globalisation (GLZ) and financial development (FIND) promote the renewable energy (RE) transition in the context of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). The panel-corrected-standard-error technique infers that a one-point increase in GLZ and FIND reduces the RE share in total energy consumption in the ASEAN region by 0.71% and 8.41%, respectively. It finds that the investment in energy with private participation moderates the relationship between FIND and RE, and FDI except in energy moderates the relations between GLZ and RE. The country-specific estimation suggests that Cambodia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam be concerned about GLZ, while the Philippines and Vietnam also be concerned about FIND since these might affect their RE transition process. The ASEAN policymakers should earmark funds specifically for renewables and prudently navigate the trade globalisation process to transform this region into a low-carbon region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies is the flagship journal of the Crawford School of Public Policy at The Australian National University. It is a peer-reviewed journal that targets research in policy studies in Australia, Asia and the Pacific, across a discipline focus that includes economics, political science, governance, development and the environment. Specific themes of recent interest include health and education, aid, migration, inequality, poverty reduction, energy, climate and the environment, food policy, public administration, the role of the private sector in public policy, trade, foreign policy, natural resource management and development policy. Papers on a range of topics that speak to various disciplines, the region and policy makers are encouraged. The goal of the journal is to break down barriers across disciplines, and generate policy impact. Submissions will be reviewed on the basis of content, policy relevance and readability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信