厌氧消化器的安装显著减少了加州奶牛场的液体粪便管理CH4排放

IF 4.1 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Michael V. Rodriguez, Nidia Rojas Robles, Valerie Carranza, Ranga Thiruvenkatachari, Mariana Reyes, Chelsea V. Preble, Joyce Pexton, Deanne Meyer, Ray G. Anderson, Akula Venkatram, Francesca M. Hopkins
{"title":"厌氧消化器的安装显著减少了加州奶牛场的液体粪便管理CH4排放","authors":"Michael V. Rodriguez,&nbsp;Nidia Rojas Robles,&nbsp;Valerie Carranza,&nbsp;Ranga Thiruvenkatachari,&nbsp;Mariana Reyes,&nbsp;Chelsea V. Preble,&nbsp;Joyce Pexton,&nbsp;Deanne Meyer,&nbsp;Ray G. Anderson,&nbsp;Akula Venkatram,&nbsp;Francesca M. Hopkins","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anaerobic digesters are expected to significantly reduce CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from dairy manure management by capturing them for use as biogas. Anaerobic digestion is the current major mitigation strategy for agricultural CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in California's climate policy. However, verification of the effectiveness of anaerobic digesters to reduce CH<sub>4</sub> emissions has not been conducted at scale in California. We made atmospheric measurements from a mobile platform and used dispersion modeling to estimate CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from a liquid manure storage complex at a typical California dairy before and after digester installation across nine field campaigns. The anaerobic digester reduced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions by an average of 82% ± 16%, comparing paired months to predigester values. Prior to the digester, atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> mole fractions showed a persistent hotspot near the manure settling basin cells of 28.6 ± 8.9 ppm. After the digester, atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> mole fractions from manure storage were greatly reduced. We observed strong temporal variability across measurement campaigns due to weather, on-farm management practices, and digester operations. Estimated emissions greatly exceeded those based on inventory calculations used by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) but were in line with expected relative emissions reduction from digester installation. Scaling these results to 139 dairies with digester projects statewide suggests that similarly operating digesters would reduce CH<sub>4</sub> emissions by 1.6 ± 0.3 MMT CO<sub>2</sub>e (65 ± 12 Gg CH<sub>4</sub>), 39% of the emissions reduction goal for livestock manure management set by California law. This work demonstrates the effectiveness of anaerobic digesters to reduce dairy manure management CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in practice, along with the importance of understanding operations and management for interpreting on-farm CH<sub>4</sub> emissions studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anaerobic Digester Installation Significantly Reduces Liquid Manure Management CH4 Emissions at a California Dairy Farm\",\"authors\":\"Michael V. Rodriguez,&nbsp;Nidia Rojas Robles,&nbsp;Valerie Carranza,&nbsp;Ranga Thiruvenkatachari,&nbsp;Mariana Reyes,&nbsp;Chelsea V. Preble,&nbsp;Joyce Pexton,&nbsp;Deanne Meyer,&nbsp;Ray G. Anderson,&nbsp;Akula Venkatram,&nbsp;Francesca M. Hopkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Anaerobic digesters are expected to significantly reduce CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from dairy manure management by capturing them for use as biogas. Anaerobic digestion is the current major mitigation strategy for agricultural CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in California's climate policy. However, verification of the effectiveness of anaerobic digesters to reduce CH<sub>4</sub> emissions has not been conducted at scale in California. We made atmospheric measurements from a mobile platform and used dispersion modeling to estimate CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from a liquid manure storage complex at a typical California dairy before and after digester installation across nine field campaigns. The anaerobic digester reduced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions by an average of 82% ± 16%, comparing paired months to predigester values. Prior to the digester, atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> mole fractions showed a persistent hotspot near the manure settling basin cells of 28.6 ± 8.9 ppm. After the digester, atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> mole fractions from manure storage were greatly reduced. We observed strong temporal variability across measurement campaigns due to weather, on-farm management practices, and digester operations. Estimated emissions greatly exceeded those based on inventory calculations used by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) but were in line with expected relative emissions reduction from digester installation. Scaling these results to 139 dairies with digester projects statewide suggests that similarly operating digesters would reduce CH<sub>4</sub> emissions by 1.6 ± 0.3 MMT CO<sub>2</sub>e (65 ± 12 Gg CH<sub>4</sub>), 39% of the emissions reduction goal for livestock manure management set by California law. This work demonstrates the effectiveness of anaerobic digesters to reduce dairy manure management CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in practice, along with the importance of understanding operations and management for interpreting on-farm CH<sub>4</sub> emissions studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70047\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70047\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

厌氧沼气池有望通过捕获奶牛粪便作为沼气使用,显著减少奶牛粪便管理产生的甲烷排放。厌氧消化是目前加州气候政策中减少农业甲烷排放的主要策略。然而,在加州尚未大规模验证厌氧消化池减少甲烷排放的有效性。我们通过移动平台进行了大气测量,并使用分散模型估算了加州一家典型乳制品厂在安装消化池前后的甲烷排放量。与预消化器相比,厌氧消化器平均减少了82%±16%的CH4排放。在沼气池之前,大气CH4摩尔分数在粪便沉降池池附近呈现28.6±8.9 ppm的持续热点。沼气池后,粪便储存产生的大气CH4摩尔分数大大降低。我们观察到,由于天气、农场管理实践和沼气池操作,测量活动的时间变化很强。估计的排放量大大超过了加州空气资源委员会(CARB)使用的库存计算,但与预计的沼气池安装的相对排放量一致。将这些结果扩展到全州139个有沼气池项目的奶牛场,结果表明,类似操作的沼气池将减少1.6±0.3 MMT CO2e(65±12 Gg CH4)的甲烷排放,达到加州法律规定的牲畜粪便管理减排目标的39%。这项工作在实践中证明了厌氧消化器在减少奶牛粪便管理CH4排放方面的有效性,以及理解操作和管理对解释农场CH4排放研究的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Anaerobic Digester Installation Significantly Reduces Liquid Manure Management CH4 Emissions at a California Dairy Farm

Anaerobic Digester Installation Significantly Reduces Liquid Manure Management CH4 Emissions at a California Dairy Farm

Anaerobic digesters are expected to significantly reduce CH4 emissions from dairy manure management by capturing them for use as biogas. Anaerobic digestion is the current major mitigation strategy for agricultural CH4 emissions in California's climate policy. However, verification of the effectiveness of anaerobic digesters to reduce CH4 emissions has not been conducted at scale in California. We made atmospheric measurements from a mobile platform and used dispersion modeling to estimate CH4 emissions from a liquid manure storage complex at a typical California dairy before and after digester installation across nine field campaigns. The anaerobic digester reduced CH4 emissions by an average of 82% ± 16%, comparing paired months to predigester values. Prior to the digester, atmospheric CH4 mole fractions showed a persistent hotspot near the manure settling basin cells of 28.6 ± 8.9 ppm. After the digester, atmospheric CH4 mole fractions from manure storage were greatly reduced. We observed strong temporal variability across measurement campaigns due to weather, on-farm management practices, and digester operations. Estimated emissions greatly exceeded those based on inventory calculations used by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) but were in line with expected relative emissions reduction from digester installation. Scaling these results to 139 dairies with digester projects statewide suggests that similarly operating digesters would reduce CH4 emissions by 1.6 ± 0.3 MMT CO2e (65 ± 12 Gg CH4), 39% of the emissions reduction goal for livestock manure management set by California law. This work demonstrates the effectiveness of anaerobic digesters to reduce dairy manure management CH4 emissions in practice, along with the importance of understanding operations and management for interpreting on-farm CH4 emissions studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信