幼儿设施内儿童早期适应不良图式的依恋关系

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
George Tsouvelas, Roza Laious, Michaila Chondrokouki, Xenia Antoniou, George Nikolaidis
{"title":"幼儿设施内儿童早期适应不良图式的依恋关系","authors":"George Tsouvelas,&nbsp;Roza Laious,&nbsp;Michaila Chondrokouki,&nbsp;Xenia Antoniou,&nbsp;George Nikolaidis","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study examines the relationship between attachment styles and early maladaptive schemas (EMS) in 66 children aged 8–18 living in institutional care in Greece. Attachment was evaluated using three methods: (1) self-reports on peer relationships through the Attachment Questionnaire for Children, (2) therapist evaluations of parental attachment via Attachment Style Prototypes and (3) self-reports on caregiver relationships using the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale–Revised Child version. Using a multimethod approach—including self- and therapist-reported measures—findings revealed that insecure attachment, particularly avoidant patterns with caregivers, was strongly associated with EMS in the Disconnection/Rejection domain. The analysis revealed notably elevated EMS scores, most prominently in Vulnerability to Harm, Unrelenting Standards, Emotional Inhibition and Self-Sacrifice. Among the assessed attachment patterns, avoidant attachment to caregivers emerged as more prevalent than anxiety-based attachment. In contrast, secure attachment was most frequently reported in peer relationships, whereas therapist evaluations of parental attachment indicated a predominance of preoccupied and disorganised styles. Notably, avoidant attachment was strongly associated with specific schemas, such as Emotional Deprivation and Self-Sacrifice. Significant variations in EMS were identified across attachment styles, with avoidant children displaying more pronounced maladaptive patterns. The findings underscore the imperative of fostering secure attachment within institutional care environments and support the implementation of targeted interventions aimed at mitigating attachment-related difficulties and preventing the emergence of EMS in this high-risk population.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspects of Attachment in Relation to Early Maladaptive Schemas in Children Residing in Child Care Facilities\",\"authors\":\"George Tsouvelas,&nbsp;Roza Laious,&nbsp;Michaila Chondrokouki,&nbsp;Xenia Antoniou,&nbsp;George Nikolaidis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpp.70095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This study examines the relationship between attachment styles and early maladaptive schemas (EMS) in 66 children aged 8–18 living in institutional care in Greece. Attachment was evaluated using three methods: (1) self-reports on peer relationships through the Attachment Questionnaire for Children, (2) therapist evaluations of parental attachment via Attachment Style Prototypes and (3) self-reports on caregiver relationships using the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale–Revised Child version. Using a multimethod approach—including self- and therapist-reported measures—findings revealed that insecure attachment, particularly avoidant patterns with caregivers, was strongly associated with EMS in the Disconnection/Rejection domain. The analysis revealed notably elevated EMS scores, most prominently in Vulnerability to Harm, Unrelenting Standards, Emotional Inhibition and Self-Sacrifice. Among the assessed attachment patterns, avoidant attachment to caregivers emerged as more prevalent than anxiety-based attachment. In contrast, secure attachment was most frequently reported in peer relationships, whereas therapist evaluations of parental attachment indicated a predominance of preoccupied and disorganised styles. Notably, avoidant attachment was strongly associated with specific schemas, such as Emotional Deprivation and Self-Sacrifice. Significant variations in EMS were identified across attachment styles, with avoidant children displaying more pronounced maladaptive patterns. The findings underscore the imperative of fostering secure attachment within institutional care environments and support the implementation of targeted interventions aimed at mitigating attachment-related difficulties and preventing the emergence of EMS in this high-risk population.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70095\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对66名8-18岁希腊儿童的依恋类型与早期适应不良图式(EMS)的关系进行了研究。本研究采用三种评估方法:(1)通过儿童依恋问卷对同伴关系进行自我报告,(2)治疗师通过依恋类型原型对父母依恋进行评估,(3)使用《亲密关系体验量表-儿童修订版》对照顾者关系进行自我报告。采用多种方法——包括自我和治疗师报告的测量方法——发现,不安全的依恋,特别是与照顾者的回避模式,与断开/拒绝领域的EMS密切相关。分析显示,EMS得分显著提高,最显著的是易受伤害、无情标准、情绪抑制和自我牺牲。在评估的依恋模式中,对照顾者的回避型依恋比焦虑型依恋更为普遍。相比之下,安全依恋在同伴关系中最常见,而治疗师对父母依恋的评估表明,专注型和无序型的依恋占主导地位。值得注意的是,回避型依恋与特定的图式密切相关,如情感剥夺和自我牺牲。在依恋类型中发现了EMS的显著差异,逃避型儿童表现出更明显的适应不良模式。研究结果强调了在机构护理环境中培养安全依恋的必要性,并支持有针对性的干预措施的实施,旨在减轻依恋相关的困难,防止在这一高危人群中出现EMS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aspects of Attachment in Relation to Early Maladaptive Schemas in Children Residing in Child Care Facilities

This study examines the relationship between attachment styles and early maladaptive schemas (EMS) in 66 children aged 8–18 living in institutional care in Greece. Attachment was evaluated using three methods: (1) self-reports on peer relationships through the Attachment Questionnaire for Children, (2) therapist evaluations of parental attachment via Attachment Style Prototypes and (3) self-reports on caregiver relationships using the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale–Revised Child version. Using a multimethod approach—including self- and therapist-reported measures—findings revealed that insecure attachment, particularly avoidant patterns with caregivers, was strongly associated with EMS in the Disconnection/Rejection domain. The analysis revealed notably elevated EMS scores, most prominently in Vulnerability to Harm, Unrelenting Standards, Emotional Inhibition and Self-Sacrifice. Among the assessed attachment patterns, avoidant attachment to caregivers emerged as more prevalent than anxiety-based attachment. In contrast, secure attachment was most frequently reported in peer relationships, whereas therapist evaluations of parental attachment indicated a predominance of preoccupied and disorganised styles. Notably, avoidant attachment was strongly associated with specific schemas, such as Emotional Deprivation and Self-Sacrifice. Significant variations in EMS were identified across attachment styles, with avoidant children displaying more pronounced maladaptive patterns. The findings underscore the imperative of fostering secure attachment within institutional care environments and support the implementation of targeted interventions aimed at mitigating attachment-related difficulties and preventing the emergence of EMS in this high-risk population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信