相信一种阴谋论会导致一个人更有可能相信其他阴谋论吗?

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Matt N. Williams, Mathew D. Marques, John R. Kerr, Stephen R. Hill, Mathew Ling, Edward J. R. Clarke
{"title":"相信一种阴谋论会导致一个人更有可能相信其他阴谋论吗?","authors":"Matt N. Williams,&nbsp;Mathew D. Marques,&nbsp;John R. Kerr,&nbsp;Stephen R. Hill,&nbsp;Mathew Ling,&nbsp;Edward J. R. Clarke","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.3153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The monological belief system model suggests that—for at least a subset of people—developing a belief in one conspiracy theory will <i>cause</i> them to be more likely to believe in others. This model has been influential in the literature, but its core causal hypothesis has never been credibly tested. We therefore tested it in two longitudinal studies. Study 1 used a sample from New Zealand and Australia (<i>N</i> = 498), with 7 monthly waves. Study 2 (preregistered) used a sample from New Zealand, Australia and the United Kingdom (<i>N</i> = 978), with 13 monthly waves. We applied random intercept cross-lagged panel models, permitting a credible causal identification strategy, albeit we cannot rule out time-varying confounds. We find that increased belief in a conspiracy theory at one wave did (on average) predict increased belief in other conspiracies at the next wave, although the estimated coefficients were small.</p>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"55 4","pages":"554-564"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsp.3153","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Developing a Belief in One Conspiracy Theory Lead a Person to be More Likely to Believe in Others?\",\"authors\":\"Matt N. Williams,&nbsp;Mathew D. Marques,&nbsp;John R. Kerr,&nbsp;Stephen R. Hill,&nbsp;Mathew Ling,&nbsp;Edward J. R. Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsp.3153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The monological belief system model suggests that—for at least a subset of people—developing a belief in one conspiracy theory will <i>cause</i> them to be more likely to believe in others. This model has been influential in the literature, but its core causal hypothesis has never been credibly tested. We therefore tested it in two longitudinal studies. Study 1 used a sample from New Zealand and Australia (<i>N</i> = 498), with 7 monthly waves. Study 2 (preregistered) used a sample from New Zealand, Australia and the United Kingdom (<i>N</i> = 978), with 13 monthly waves. We applied random intercept cross-lagged panel models, permitting a credible causal identification strategy, albeit we cannot rule out time-varying confounds. We find that increased belief in a conspiracy theory at one wave did (on average) predict increased belief in other conspiracies at the next wave, although the estimated coefficients were small.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"55 4\",\"pages\":\"554-564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsp.3153\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.3153\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.3153","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单论信仰系统模型表明,至少对一部分人来说,形成对一种阴谋论的信仰会使他们更有可能相信其他阴谋论。这个模型在文献中很有影响力,但其核心的因果假设从未得到可信的检验。因此,我们在两项纵向研究中进行了测试。研究1使用来自新西兰和澳大利亚的样本(N = 498),每月7次。研究2(预注册)使用来自新西兰、澳大利亚和英国的样本(N = 978),每月13次。我们采用随机截距交叉滞后面板模型,允许可信的因果识别策略,尽管我们不能排除时变混淆。我们发现,在一个浪潮中增加对阴谋论的信仰(平均而言)预示着在下一个浪潮中增加对其他阴谋论的信仰,尽管估计系数很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Developing a Belief in One Conspiracy Theory Lead a Person to be More Likely to Believe in Others?

The monological belief system model suggests that—for at least a subset of people—developing a belief in one conspiracy theory will cause them to be more likely to believe in others. This model has been influential in the literature, but its core causal hypothesis has never been credibly tested. We therefore tested it in two longitudinal studies. Study 1 used a sample from New Zealand and Australia (N = 498), with 7 monthly waves. Study 2 (preregistered) used a sample from New Zealand, Australia and the United Kingdom (N = 978), with 13 monthly waves. We applied random intercept cross-lagged panel models, permitting a credible causal identification strategy, albeit we cannot rule out time-varying confounds. We find that increased belief in a conspiracy theory at one wave did (on average) predict increased belief in other conspiracies at the next wave, although the estimated coefficients were small.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Topics covered include, among others, intergroup relations, group processes, social cognition, attitudes, social influence and persuasion, self and identity, verbal and nonverbal communication, language and thought, affect and emotion, embodied and situated cognition and individual differences of social-psychological relevance. Together with original research articles, the European Journal of Social Psychology"s innovative and inclusive style is reflected in the variety of articles published: Research Article: Original articles that provide a significant contribution to the understanding of social phenomena, up to a maximum of 12,000 words in length.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信